Reviews
Review Index
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Donations
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
AudioKC's latest activity
AudioKC
reacted to
staticV3's post
in the thread
Sennheiser HD 490 Pro Headphone Review
with
Like
.
Put Amir's distortion measurements into context using: 1. Distortion audibility thresholds: 2. Music spectra: 3. Actual listening...
Tuesday at 4:09 AM
AudioKC
reacted to
DanTheMan's post
in the thread
Tekton M-Lore Speaker Measurement Update
with
Like
.
I think Tekton would have been wise to plug their own holes.
Sunday at 12:44 AM
AudioKC
reacted to
Katzz's post
in the thread
Tekton M-Lore Speaker Measurement Update
with
Like
.
Is this a winning or losing moment for tekton design?
Sunday at 12:43 AM
AudioKC
reacted to
komhst's post
in the thread
Tekton M-Lore Speaker Measurement Update
with
Like
.
It is obvious that Amir's measurements were correct from the beginning. As was Erin's. It makes little difference whether the acoustic...
Sunday at 12:43 AM
AudioKC
reacted to
solderdude's post
in the thread
Tekton M-Lore Speaker Measurement Update
with
Like
.
Bass port tuning did change/improve a little bit. Step response does look a bit better and for a simple passive speaker does not look...
Sunday at 12:42 AM
AudioKC
reacted to
sweetchaos's post
in the thread
Tekton M-Lore Speaker Measurement Update
with
Like
.
Sunday at 12:39 AM
AudioKC
reacted to
amirm's post
in the thread
Tekton M-Lore Speaker Measurement Update
with
Like
.
As most of you probably know, I reviewed the Tekton M-Lore speaker back in October of last year. Company recently complained that my...
Sunday at 12:39 AM
AudioKC
reacted to
amirm's post
in the thread
Topping D50 III Balanced DAC with EQ Review
with
Like
.
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Topping D50 III balanced stereo DAC with support for parametric equalization. It was...
Apr 18, 2024
AudioKC
reacted to
amirm's post
in the thread
Topping D50 III Balanced DAC with EQ Review
with
Like
.
Reserved for @AdamG to kindly post specs. :) Manufacturer Specifications:
Apr 18, 2024
AudioKC
reacted to
ObjectiveSubjectivist's post
in the thread
Topping D50 III Balanced DAC with EQ Review
with
Like
.
It's worth to mention that EQ is only working with USB input!
Apr 18, 2024
AudioKC
reacted to
Rja4000's post
in the thread
(Unofficial) Topping D50 III DAC review and measurements
with
Like
.
-90.31 dBFS is not a random value That's exactly the level of the 15th bit. [ 20*LOG10(2^-15) ] That's why you see those "stairs" in...
Apr 15, 2024
AudioKC
replied to the thread
(Unofficial) Topping D50 III DAC review and measurements
.
Got my answer from GPT. Choosing 997 Hz instead of a round 1,000 Hz for test signals is a practice that stems from the early days of...
Apr 14, 2024
AudioKC
reacted to
daniboun's post
in the thread
TOPPING D90 III Sabre DAC Review
with
Like
.
SOTA perf ) Dont get me wrong but the SMSL D6s reaches 123.5db Sinad with 5v (max volume) with XLR outs @ $200 )))
Apr 14, 2024
AudioKC
replied to the thread
(Unofficial) Topping D50 III DAC review and measurements
.
fantastic dac and fantastic review. I love that test with sin wave at noise floor for 16bit. Why though 997hz?
Apr 14, 2024
AudioKC
reacted to
Rja4000's post
in the thread
(Unofficial) Topping D50 III DAC review and measurements
with
Like
.
Also, because i know some are looking into this, here is a 997Hz Sine wave played at -90.31dBFS through the Topping D50 III in 16 bits...
Apr 14, 2024
Members
Top
Bottom