I am a fan of the elegant simplicity of the sealed enclosure. But, I am also honestly not certain I could discriminate ported from sealed without peeking.
I'm also not convinced that a ported system is represented by a parallel topology. Does the speaker not drive the output of the port?
OTOH, it seems clear that reflections can constitute a non-minimum-phase system. I am happy to learn otherwise in either case.
You're
wrong.
In the case of a bass reflex speaker we are not merely cascading responses, we are adding them - we hear the speaker driver
and the output of the port. Intuitively, we can't correct the sum of the two (make it into a single transient impulse) because the port 'echoes' whatever we do with the cone - possibly with a larger output. Even with a complex model, we can't invert the system because the result is unstable, needing to provide larger and larger corrections.
The quote from your link is missing a (IMO) key piece of information (italicized):
It is also worth noting that if minimum-phase LTI systems are connected in series, the overall system remains minimum phase. The similar property does not hold in the case of systems whose responses are added: the responses of minimum phase system components when added produce a result which is typically not minimum phase
A series arrangement of minimum-phase systems will remain a minimum-phase system in totality.
A parallel topology of minimum-phase systems
may not produce a minimum phase system.
A discrete minimum-phase system will have all poles and zeroes in the unit circle. Since all poles/zeroes are less than +/-1, the poles/zeroes of the
product of any such systems will also be less than +/-1. The same cannot be said when
summing poles/zeroes, as in a parallel topology.