This is a very solid burn, hahaLooks like a vocational school's CNC class project.
This is a very solid burn, hahaLooks like a vocational school's CNC class project.
Whatdayouknow, sounds like my ALAC file from the "Steely Dan, the Definitive Collection" CD - only a trifle blurrier. Of course, the You Tube presentation is some sort of data deprived MP3. Not what I would call a convincing demonstration of the glories of analog replay.
Oh my, Mikey's breaking the hearts of the folks that have the MB2 pressing of the original LP. LOLWhatdayouknow, sounds like my ALAC file from the "Steely Dan, the Definitive Collection" CD - only a trifle blurrier. Of course, the You Tube presentation is some sort of data deprived MP3.
Still have my copy of the same. I've got a SACD player, but don't have 5.1 capability anymore, no room where the stereo's set up.Oh my, Mikey's breaking the hearts of the folks that have the MB2 pressing of the original LP. LOL
BLAH
Mastered in Stereo and 5.1 by Bernie Grundman from 1980 Bob Ludwig EQ'd master.
5.1 was an affectation, anyway. No loss there, sir.Still have my copy of the same. I've got a SACD player, but don't have 5.1 capability anymore, no room where the stereo's set up.
Stereo is the best anywaysStill have my copy of the same. I've got a SACD player, but don't have 5.1 capability anymore, no room where the stereo's set up.
There were a few 5.1 recordings that were different and interesting. Bob Dylan's self-produced "Love and Theft" comes to mind. However, a lot of pop recordings would stick instrumentalists behind you in a way that could make you paranoid. And those classical releases I had didn't really convince me with the orchestra up front, hall reverb in the back perspective. The famous Carlos Kleiber/VPO recording of Beethoven's 5th in surround sounded better than the two-channel mixdown, but I suspect that had more to do with a different EQ than the virtues of surround. A lot of older analog classical recordings sound better in remixed versions anyway, like Bernstein's NYPO Mahler cycle and Karajan's 1970's Beethoven cycle.5.1 was an affectation, anyway. No loss there, sir.
Only for those too cheap to expand into Quad, 5.1, or better yet AtmosStereo is the best anyways
Was that image generated by Chat GPT-4 or similar?
The image creator is (I believe) Dall-E 3.Bing's AI. Which I believe is Chat GPT 4.
Only for those too cheap to expand into Quad, 5.1, or better yet Atmos
Anything Stereo can do, multich can do X-channels better.
Not necessarily. Us two channel plebs have more money left over to buy more expensive tonearms for our more expensive turntables.
Just from the pic that appears from the image in the post, are there any albums you can identify from the spines we can see?On casual listen, this sounds quite nice IMO:
Didn't "distort and sound all horrible" but it was also the sort of track one would strategically place as a final track on an LP as it has no dynamics and low volume. The vocal is practically whispered. I can see a touch of disc eccentricity, but as this is close to sprechstimme, pitch don't matter all that much anyway.On casual listen, this sounds quite nice IMO: