Jakob1863
Addicted to Fun and Learning
"The second approach would rely on the fact that there exists a reality independent from the subjective impression of a human but reflected by the subjective impressions. From that point of view a listening test is obejctive if it measures the subjective response with a repeatable, reliable method.
Although getting the exact same result even in a repetition is quite unlikely, this uncertainty is just the property of the detector (listener) and will be addressed in the same way as the uncertainty from detectors in other fields."
That was the whole paragraph; i really think that it doesn´t make sense to split it apart and then commenting the snippets without proper consideration of the thoughts behind.
In this framework a listening test (well designed, well planned and well executed, which means is objective valid and reliable) is objective although the output of the detector (i.e. the listener) reflects a subjective impression.
Although getting the exact same result even in a repetition is quite unlikely, this uncertainty is just the property of the detector (listener) and will be addressed in the same way as the uncertainty from detectors in other fields."
That was the whole paragraph; i really think that it doesn´t make sense to split it apart and then commenting the snippets without proper consideration of the thoughts behind.
In this framework a listening test (well designed, well planned and well executed, which means is objective valid and reliable) is objective although the output of the detector (i.e. the listener) reflects a subjective impression.
Last edited: