NorthSky
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,998
- Likes
- 945
"Whether or not the M2 or 4367 is a better value may come down to exactly what amp you want to pair with the 4367 and how much it costs.
I finally got some details on differences between the 4367 and the M2. While they are mostly the same speaker, here is a list of a few of the modifications that may cause someone to lean toward one or the other:
The M2 and 4367 use different waveguides and crossover networks. The woofers are slightly different - the M2 uses the 2216nd, and the 4367 uses the 2216nd-1 which has a resonance that is slightly lower in frequency. The M2 utilizes DSP processing which has trade-offs. It does allow the M2 woofer to extend lower in frequency, but if you are an analog audio enthusiast you may not want to be going through a separate digital DSP section.
The drivers themselves have the same power handling. Since it is geared more toward the consumer market, the 300 watts is a conservative power rating for the 4367. "
I finally got some details on differences between the 4367 and the M2. While they are mostly the same speaker, here is a list of a few of the modifications that may cause someone to lean toward one or the other:
The M2 and 4367 use different waveguides and crossover networks. The woofers are slightly different - the M2 uses the 2216nd, and the 4367 uses the 2216nd-1 which has a resonance that is slightly lower in frequency. The M2 utilizes DSP processing which has trade-offs. It does allow the M2 woofer to extend lower in frequency, but if you are an analog audio enthusiast you may not want to be going through a separate digital DSP section.
The drivers themselves have the same power handling. Since it is geared more toward the consumer market, the 300 watts is a conservative power rating for the 4367. "