I also always wonder & marvel how such profoundly subjective minds keep inventing strawmen and shifting burden of proofs.
-
WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Denafrips Ares II - is it really worth it?
- Thread starter dogonelder
- Start date
I also always wonder & marvel how such profoundly subjective minds keep inventing strawmen and shifting burden of proofs.
Veri
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2018
- Messages
- 9,632
- Likes
- 12,137
More connections. Pride of ownership/latest DAC chip (I mean chips from 20 years ago weren't even that bad). Aesthetics. Or of course features, ADI-2 DAC can obviously do a lot more than most others, as an example.
You picked an example, it is not proof for all cases.
I value measurements. Then I choose the sound. Still, one camp is furious against the other. Funny, it is the 'rational' camp, hahahaaa.
What is there to marvel about? Why are people not allowed to make informed choices?
Not buying the cheapest box doesn't mean people believe they are buying better sound.
I can see why it can be complex for minds lacking basic understanding at logic.
pinpoint_oxford
Active Member
The steel chassis and linear transformer does make the Ares II heavier that many other DACs, anyway.I wish we cold measure that DAC "weight", maybe amir should buy some kind of audiophile scale..?
raif71
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
- Messages
- 2,479
- Likes
- 2,701
Hi, may I know why you spent only 2 weeks with the Bifrost 2 ?
As no one can hear the difference between 0.00006% and 0.005% THD then on that measure alone buy the cheapest if you happy with how it sounds. Unfortunately DAC's do actually sound different in differing systems.
How different is the question? Any decent DAC nowadays should pass the test and you won't hear a difference between them.
They have different output volumes for a start? That certainly affects how they sound.
That's why you listen volume matched.
If one DAC outputs 3.7 volt and the next DAC 5.2 volt it's no surprise that they sound different
In the case of Denafrips they also provide balanced outputs, these measure differently to unbalanced. Amplifiers however measure differently at different gain settings.
Compare* volume matched.
This would be only useful for an AB listening and to isolate this factor.In real life use, an higher output voltage is indeed an advantage, especially when driving power amps or active speakers.
I hoped you would take it as a given that I am aware of that and get to the meat and potatoes of the matter. Matched levels tests will result in no discernable difference between any decent quality DAC offerings today.
scruffy1
Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2019
- Messages
- 80
- Likes
- 53
seeing i showed my ignorance earlier in this thread, in considering the denafrips, and was soundly discouraged (boom tish) from believing subjective assessment is basis for a system of stable scientific measurement (apologies to monty python)
anyway, i ultimately upgraded my khadas tone 1 to a topping e70 and confidently state i like it even more than the khadas
it demonstrably measures better per amir's investigations, and the ess "hump" is not present
i lack the equipment and leads and enthusiasm to try blind testing; it may all be psychoacoustic trickery, but it "sounds" better
anyway, i ultimately upgraded my khadas tone 1 to a topping e70 and confidently state i like it even more than the khadas
it demonstrably measures better per amir's investigations, and the ess "hump" is not present
i lack the equipment and leads and enthusiasm to try blind testing; it may all be psychoacoustic trickery, but it "sounds" better
I know the ESS hump often exists, but at the levels in which it shows up, I’d assert it is an inaudible difference between DACs outside of the test lab.
scruffy1
Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2019
- Messages
- 80
- Likes
- 53
versus the khadas it seems to sound like a discernable step up
i like the 12v trigger and remote and bluetooth such that it is probably okay even if it doesn't produce better analogue - but i am an attentive listener even before the change, and there are frequencies coming forward that i hadn't been aware of previously, and the bass response seems to somehow make the notes very distinct
might be the filters (that i can't find in the menu) - or am i deluded by investment and expectation?
i like the 12v trigger and remote and bluetooth such that it is probably okay even if it doesn't produce better analogue - but i am an attentive listener even before the change, and there are frequencies coming forward that i hadn't been aware of previously, and the bass response seems to somehow make the notes very distinct
might be the filters (that i can't find in the menu) - or am i deluded by investment and expectation?
If the output levels from a DAC differs then the gain needed by the amplifier to drive speakers changes, so its not a one dimensional issue.I hoped you would take it as a given that I am aware of that and get to the meat and potatoes of the matter. Matched levels tests will result in no discernable difference between any decent quality DAC offerings today.
Should?
Similar threads
