Search results

It's not plastic. You can't remove it. It's full of epoxy or something.

As I wrote above, I do not wish to argue. Is this hard to understand? Have a nice day.

Perhaps, to be more clear, I'll add sterile as well. But, as I wrote above, I don't feel like getting into polemics. There are as many people on earth as there are individual judgments about sound, color, etc. Here I have shared what I feel, but by no means would I want to impose anything...

Yes of course. Otherwise, why waste my time, money and warranty, if I can't hear the difference? This action was not dictated by "someone said, it was better", but the result of many experiments and DIY projects. I hope that's enough and I don't want to get into unnecessary polemics.

Hi! I haven't removed the front panel. The back two screws are removed, as well as the ones below, and the back panel comes out. Don't forget to disconnect the ribbon cable for the display. Regarding the D10s SMPS, as far as I remember, there is no SMPS filter, and it is possible to break its...

They could put audio capacitors where necessary, but Chinese, as always, want to go as thin as possible.

A light mod to get rid of the soulless sound.

Toping E70 from the inside...

Easier to read (compared to the original madness) user manual.

I think the Si5351A is not the right one. Please check the pinout of Si5351A and PCB layout if they match. Good luck!

SMSL DO200MKII SMSL SU-9 PRO

That's right. Anyone can make it from a piece of 2mm copper wire.

In fact, removing these SOIC-8s takes about 2 seconds if there is no thermal pad.

In the first screenshot, they measure distortions as far as I can see.

It is not a noise, it is a distortion. ESS hump. https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/intermodulation-distortion-hump-on-topping-and-others.3813/ https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/topping-e50-has-the-ess-hump.26045/ Start point to reduce ESS hump...

1 x LM4562 - AVCC_LR 2 x LM4562 - I/V + LPF

You can use WASAPI instead ASIO.

Look, I'm sorry to say this, but I have neither the strength nor the nerve to argue on the subject. Buy OP and test. I said what I meant to say.

Not good idea. OPA2134 is mediocre quality today. The best sound, from the experiments I have done so far, were ADA4898-2 and OPA1612. OPA1656 is not suitable, or at least not in this buffer variant. But, it's best for you to figure out how you like the sound the most.