Neuro's latest activity
-
Neuro replied to the thread Deep and narrow frequency null around 90hz - shall I be concerned?.I doubt this small frequency dip is audible for neurophysiological reasons. The inner hair cells have significant frequency overlap... -
Neuro replied to the thread Louder is better..Higher sound pressure above 85 dB tricks the listener into perceiving it's good. An old trick to sell bad speakers with audible...
-
Neuro posted the thread "Quantum Cognition" should probably be taken into account in sound assessments? in Psychoacoustics: Science of How We Hear.Non-double-blind studies with subjective sound judgments are often not accurate. The order of rated sounds matters in simple "blind...
-
Neuro replied to the thread Spin-o-rama for synthetic Bipole and Dipole speakers?.An important development of the spinorama technique could be, based on objective measurements, to extrapolate how in a given room (the...
-
Neuro posted the thread “Anauralia”—the auditory analogue to aphantasia in Psychoacoustics: Science of How We Hear.Aphantasia is the inability to evoke one's own imagined conscious images. "Anauralia" is the inability to evoke one's imagined conscious...
-
Neuro replied to the thread Psychoacoustics is not the science of hearing..Correct understanding of hearing is much more complicated than psychoacoustics makes it seem. The hearing of sounds is divided into...
-
Neuro replied to the thread The brain processes speech and its echo separately.I quickly checked the study. The stimuli are relatively undefined concerning duration, relative loudness and frequency. Which words are...
-
Neuro replied to the thread What makes big speakers sound "big"and smaller ones sound "small"?.When listening to mono music on a Yamaha NS1000, boxspeaker, height of 0.65 m next to an Apogee Duetta, dipol, height of 1.5 m, the...
-
When listening to mono music on a Yamaha NS1000, a height of 0.65 m next to an Apogee Duetta, a height of 1.5 m, the sound from the...