Recent content by Nango

Thanks Johny, pls report whatever the outcome is.

Where does one find that PEQ pls?

One thing is an extensive review, one thing is an opinion or a mere statement on Amazon. You might be not allowed to extensively review and test items if this is not the intended use of that good. The Mfr produces and sells ONLY for the intended use and of course you can make opinions about that...

No, this is debatable. The Mfr constructs and sells goods to you to use them, not to test them and of course not in public. I even think it is not allowed to open a chase of an amplifier and show in public its innards. This using is not the intended one when you purchased. Full stop.

In 99,99% of all trials this is so, judges, obviously, have no clue. Therefore they ask entitled experts to make a statement. Most of them will follow and judge accordingly.

So, his contributions deserve a boycott, someone else's have no consequences, is it this? Ok, just let's stay objective. No one really knows what is really happening here. Lo eats edit until the Mfr presents any charges and how they are justified by law ......and then decide, with knowledge of...

Intimidating and threating is criminal by definition. Lawfare is not allowed in the western hemisphere.

And why exactly should a user boycott a Mfr who just means to defend it's commercial interests ...... when done according to the law?

I still not sure about the bottom of the issue, what exactly is the Mfr expecting or requiring from Erin and how is this covered by law?

It's not the same.

It reminds of Braun Hifi. Never seen again.

Doubt it. They might use some Topping gear for checking their own equipment.

Omg 5 grandes down the toilet!!

Lucky germans with their Rechtschutzinsurance, the only one insurance you really need in life!!!!

Do you send in one?