• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Need Your Advice on Developing a 5.1 Channel DAC

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,089
Likes
10,949
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Does anybody knew this Canton smart amp 5.1
https://www.canton.de/produkte/typ/verstaerker-vorverstaerker/smart-amp-5.1/04154

I think it is the same as Fosi would create as new.
View attachment 321523
i can't use this unit, because it can only operate with 2 channel PCM input, LPCM is not possible as canton support told me :facepalm:
 

Lambda

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Messages
1,792
Likes
1,530
There are many cheap and good DACs.
Just make a HDMI eARK Decoder box with DSP and 6 SPDIF/Toslink outputs
 

Aaronb1138

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2023
Messages
11
Likes
12
My guess, target is those who mainly use headsets and sometimes simple multi channel for netflix (which means 7.1ch is useless).

Master volume would be nice. Remote will probably have this, but it is slow and frustrating when you can just reach out and turn.

For output, additional 3.5mm jacks would be nice. Target users will have hard time with all the rca.

And done?

If this is intended to be simple and fool-proof. Delay, bass management, and all the dsp will be worse than nothing.

If this is for serious users, complete redesign will be needed... Things like flex ht will leave this in the dust...

Flex HT can't do DD / DTS which will be its undoing. Too many TVs and other devices cannot correctly output eARC 6-channel LPCM. HDMI has always been about supporting the licensing fiefdoms, so this is to be expected. Further it has too few output channels for a DSP when they've been selling on active crossover + EQ 2/3/4 way amplified speaker setups. Honestly, I suspect besides chip shortages the Flex HT release delay is compatibility testing has shown that LPCM only support is a death sentence.

While I think Fosi should be doing an 8-ch / 7.1 box, I'm still interested in an affordable high SINAD 5.1 DAC with eARC (DD+DTS) since I'm going to have to string it into MiniDSP or similar for active crossover and EQ / bi-amped front L/C/R and I don't have a living room large enough / shaped correctly to properly accommodate more than 2 rear speakers. I have zero interest in Atmos / elevation speakers others keep bringing up and I think it's the most odious gimmick the industry has introduced to sell extra channels and speakers. At least 7.1/9.1/9.2 can correctly interpolate surround panning from 5.1/7.1 content properly. I'll be surprised if more than 3 movie titles a year use elevation channels *effectively* by 2025. It will die off in actual use like every reboot of stereoscopic 3D. We're already inundated with Blurays and streaming with crap nearfield compressed multi-channel audio instead of a proper theatrical downmix.

For DSP duties, I'm honestly looking at the C-DSP 8x12 v2 at this point despite the mediocre ADC SINAD. It simply makes the most sense for an affordable home theater active system since the F/OSS community has failed to produce a solid, obtainable, and easy to use multichannel hardware DSP. This Fosi box would be a fine alternative to my current 7.1 AVR to feed a C-DSP or an equivalent setup of DSPs even if it is a bit more limited in codecs and 3rd party matrix surround mixers I never use anyway (Neo et al).

Agree with others saying the volume knobs are useless. Let us adjust levels via remote / PC / phone app and instead let the user set multiple presets.

No clue what the MIC input is there for... streamers or karaoke?? Either way, a waste, but if the added cost is minimal, perhaps it's ignorable.
 
Last edited:

TikBLang

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2023
Messages
23
Likes
5
Agree with others saying the volume knobs are useless. Let us adjust levels via remote / PC / phone app and instead let the user set multiple presets.

yes totally makes sense. nice preamps (and also IOS/Android apps) have a volume control and mute button to control the sound remotely. I don't want to stand up in the middle of listening and manually muting the amp.
 

fxavier

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2021
Messages
7
Likes
4
Well, I would buy it if it got balanced output (XLR/TRRS), balanced input would be nice to have too but not necessary.
 

Alex91

New Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2024
Messages
1
Likes
0
make one with trs outputs 5.1 or 7.1 with eRAC for powered speakers
 

BarryTone

Member
Joined
May 3, 2023
Messages
10
Likes
12
Personally I think Fosi should focus on a competitor to the PA5 II (an improved V4 of the V3 using PFFB) and the upcoming WiiM integrated amp with HDMI-ARC (will be interesting to see how that measures), rather than this multi-channel DAC. 2c...


JSmith
Agreed - build a Wiim Amp competitor.
 

ZolaIII

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
4,196
Likes
2,476
8 chenels (as DAC's are 8 chenel) and USB input (along with other digital inputs already listed) with ability to remap chenels as you wish and that it sticks like that for all inputs. Proper 2V unbalanced analog line outs and of course deacent performance.
 

Trdat

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 6, 2019
Messages
968
Likes
397
Location
Yerevan "Sydney Born"
I think key needs(at least for me)

1. 3 channels but not more than 5.1 I say 3 because I just use a Centre for dialouge. I personally don't use any atmos or or surrounds just centre speaker for voice.
2. Room correction, must have room correction
3. Decoding 5.1 so I can use my centre channel so at least two options to decode the 5.1
4. HIgh SINAD well measuring DAC.
5. XLR outputs
 
Top Bottom