@amirm
You're right on most things, as usual
And you have a measurement: the number of hits on this forum
A few comments though:
1. You didn't only start a trend for serious measurements being published by manufacturers or reviewers (by the way, I see Audiofanzine.fr, one of the most read musicians tech website, now testing sound interfaces with an AP analyzer. They claim 623709 active members!)
You also made us understanding those measurements, and wanting to perform our own.
In my opinion, that's important to use and encourage this, because that will help to grow and create a stable base of contributors (and, potential, money providers). Ok, I speak for myself, but reading this forum I'm sure I'm not alone.
Making clear the methodology and improving some basic measurement tests, with contribution from other renowned experts, is of highest interest.
(This speaker test method being in line with that quest)
2. The typical interest is most probably not in low end speakers. The benefit of identifying cheaper good electronics is mainly to be able to spend more on critical parts like the speakers or headphones.
So, speakers in 300-5000€ (or $) range are probably the most valuable here.
(Not to speak about the difference between passive and active: at some performance level, passive speakers probably don't make sense anymore.)
3. The main limitation I feel here is the quantity.
How many tests you are able to publish a year ?
That's how other website can grow on your tracks: do faster and more.
Typical reader will not look too much into the measurement accuracy or method as long as figures or method look the same (you're the reference).
I think you should also favor the same way, to grow on quantity
while keeping control on the quality.
And keep the readers and contributors here.
Bottom line: I'll contribute at least $50. One shot for this project and on occasion later on.
Edit: I sent 50$.