mkt
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2020
- Messages
- 366
- Likes
- 497
Can I blame/credit @Kal Rubinson? 5.1 has been my pandemic indulgence. Roland octo-capture (waiting for okto pro) + 3x8331 + 2x8320 + 7350.
Do the Brits really put sugar and milk in their tea?
That's bad@ss.Can I blame/credit @Kal Rubinson? 5.1 has been my pandemic indulgence. Roland octo-capture (waiting for okto pro) + 3x8331 + 2x8320 + 7350.
View attachment 89048
If you must. I can carry that load.Can I blame/credit @Kal Rubinson?
How is it on stuff natively recorded in 5.1? Probably orchestral work.Can I blame/credit @Kal Rubinson? 5.1 has been my pandemic indulgence. Roland octo-capture (waiting for okto pro) + 3x8331 + 2x8320 + 7350.
View attachment 89048
Great! My experience is that the improvements associated with multichannel are substantial and readily apparent. I can't think of a equipment change with such a positive impact. (Also it's hard not to sound like you just joined a cult.) Unfortunately there is relatively little source material and no streaming to speak of. Fortunately, I like classical and there's a lot (relatively) of that. I learned how to rip SACDs.How is it on stuff natively recorded in 5.1? Probably orchestral work.
My desktop setup consists of a pair of Adam T5Vs, Palmer Monicon potentiometer-in-a-box, SMSL SU-8 (offscreen), OpenDRC-DI (offscreen) and DDRC-24 (offscreen).
View attachment 89250
View attachment 89249
View attachment 89248
I see, I meant something recorded with multichannel in mind, not just upmixed from stereo. On that subject, how do you do for stereo content? Upmix or just use two speakers?Great! My experience is that the improvements associated with multichannel are substantial and readily apparent. I can't think of a equipment change with such a positive impact. (Also it's hard not to sound like you just joined a cult.) Unfortunately there is relatively little source material and no streaming to speak of. Fortunately, I like classical and there's a lot (relatively) of that. I learned how to rip SACDs.
PS. I am not 100% sure what "natively recorded in 5.1" means when many recordings start with a gazillion of tracks anyway. Certainly some 5.1 mixes are better than others, and mixing choices may or may not match your personal preferences.
It's quite narrow but the distances were carefully measured, so my head is typically within the correct range by default.Ouch, the sweet spot must be the size of a grain of sand.
I don't really know how recordings are made.I see, I meant something recorded with multichannel in mind, not just upmixed from stereo. On that subject, how do you do for stereo content? Upmix or just use two speakers?
Unfortunately there is relatively little source material and no streaming to speak of.
Had good experience with the K&M 26772 and 26774 table stands, not too expensive, look cool and give you free desk space. Minimum height is 16 cm, though.Mission Control
View attachment 89356
I'm not sure what to do about stands for the speakers. I currenty have them stood on foam blocks sandwiched between granite slabs; I think they're supposed to be chopping boards. It works, it decouples the speakers from the desk somewhat and makes them about the right height, and it sounds OK, but looks a bit Heath Robinson, not that i'm overly bothered, it's not the living room.
Dynaudio have a dedicated stand, it's quite industrial looking, which I actully quite like, but they're not cheap at over £300.00 for a pair:
View attachment 89375
I was also looking at some Isoacoustics stands:
View attachment 89381
These are a little cheaper at ~£250 a pair, but have some mixed reviews, it seems they work well, but the fit and finish isn't great and a few have remarked that they seem expensive for what they are.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Audioengine tilted speaker stands.