• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

York DSP devices

Hard to beat miniDSP PocketADC, plus flexibility of a modular turnkey gizmo can be repurposed later...
This is what I was able to achieve with ES9822:

1776767669846.png


I made a test board module for ES9822
1776767700094.png


But this is mostly for measurements purpose, I use Cosmos ADC but really wanted integrated solution: S/PDIF in/out + DAC + ADC. So I assemble such device as prototype:
1. ADC ES9822
2. DAC ES9039 (From Ali, same as @Koifarm uses)
3. The DSP board below with York interfaces as 2 channel in + 2 channel out

photo_5420595611045664340_y.jpg
 
Maybe I mixed some things up.
I guess, one reason for that there are many different things that I am trying to put together into some organized product line.
But so far it is just many construction pieces of software and hardware :)
 
I think Cosmos use only one opa1612 at every input channel. Your input is a little different or not?
Yes. One of the issues with Cosmos ADC - it has quite low input impedance.
So in this one the first stage is OPA1612 as buffers to provide higher input impedance, and then - diff amp OPA1632/1633 as the filter.
 
I made a test board module for ES9822
Envy the DIY skillz.

I wish inexpensive finished OTS products based on that were available in 6 or 8 channels.

But as I stated, within that category, 3x PocketADC is hard to beat.
 
Envy the DIY skillz.

I wish inexpensive finished OTS products based on that were available in 6 or 8 channels.

But as I stated, within that category, 3x PocketADC is hard to beat.
What eclipsevl is doing is on another level entirely from the PocketADC and of great interest to a fairly wide following. He also posts this on diyAudio and I follow his work with great admiration. I already have his York USB interface and just purchased the DSP board to begin experimenting with active speaker design using FIR filters which the lesser Analog Devices chips can't do. I find the only way to truly learn how to use products like this are to jump in and start doing and make mistakes. It is how I finally got comfortable with Sigma Studio. I started with ADAU1701 DSP boards and am stepping up to the ADAU1466 to tackle more advanced designs. I honestly do not think it is possible to make and sell an all-in-one device like you seem to want at the prices eclipsevl charges. If you want inexpensive finished OTS product, look at the Down4Sound EZDSP68+. It has decent noise and distortion specs and the PC configuration software can handle active crossovers and parametric EQ. I own one and at $269, it is hard to beat.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom