The designer after reading this review:
View attachment 400777
Joking aside, great review as always. The multi-tone distortion record will be hard to beat.
Haha the designer the night he desidet to build a tube amp.
The designer after reading this review:
View attachment 400777
Joking aside, great review as always. The multi-tone distortion record will be hard to beat.
Amir, when was the last time you measured a tube amp that had no distortion?
Ugh! Just seeing "piezo tweeter" makes me cringe. I can’t stand them, probably because of all the cheap disco speakers from my youth. It’s funny -I could definitely tell the difference between good and bad sound back then, and I have fond memories of most things from that time. But piezo tweeters? Absolutely not.Of course! Unfiltered wide-band speakers in flimsy cabinets, or some esoteric 1st order crossover multiway with a vintage 1920s woofer and piezo tweeter thingy.
Ah, I heard that one back in the day. A great Canadian tube amplification manufacturer. They even had a tube-based cd player if I'm not mistaken.Not by Amir, but by me:
Sonic Frontiers SFS-80 Review (Vintage Tube Amplifier)
Sonic Frontiers SFS-80 Tube Amplifier: A "new" benchmark to beat from 1992 Up next on testing gear that would be impossible to ship safely... the Sonic Frontiers SFS-80 tube amplifier. 70 lbs, all concentrated in the transformers. Believe it or not, Sonic Frontiers is a company we all know...www.audiosciencereview.com
74 dB SINAD with tubes
I much agree. This is the strong avoid range. I expect about anyone can easily hear any item on this part of the chart sounds worse than what they typically listen to. That is, audibly worse than almost anything else out there.The good point though: Here’s an opportunity to take a close look at the bottom end of the SINAD scale finally
View attachment 400643
Really curious how this would soundThis is a review and detailed measurements of the Yaqin MC-84L Stereo Tube amplifier. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $600 on Amazon.
View attachment 400615
The picture doesn't do justice to the nice design of this amplifier. The transformer case in the back nicely contrasts with the chrome parts. The latter does make the labels hard to read though when looking from above:
View attachment 400616
One set of binding posts is available for 4 ohm and the other, 8 ohm. Seeing how speakers don't have constant impedance, nor are advertised correctly as such, I feel bad for people trying to figure out which posts to use (common criticism for all such amplifiers). Let's see how it performs.
There is a headphone jack in the back which I did not test.
Yaqin MC-84L Stereo Tube Amplifier Measurements
For all but 8 ohm power test, I used the 4 ohm tap. Let's start with our dashboard:
View attachment 400617
We have the high harmonic distortion which we kind of expect. But a lot of mains noise comes along for the ride, causing intermodulation with our main 1 kHz, making for a mess. SINAD which is the sum of all unwanted "stuff," lands the amplifier at the bottom of our rankings:
View attachment 400618
View attachment 400619
Noise is a step above but still nothing remotely to be proud of:
View attachment 400620
Frequency response is flat enough if we ignore varying performance between channels:
View attachment 400621
Crosstalk is one step above mediocre:
View attachment 400622
You get a better feel for distortion when we use 32 tones to simulate "music:"
View attachment 400623
Not pretty. Same story for 19+20 kHz tones:
View attachment 400624
The amplifier is fairly rated at 12 watts, assuming you don't care about distortion:
View attachment 400625
One channel is having trouble above 2 watts which we also saw in the dashboard. So maybe it is a bad tube or something. Best of luck to a customer figuring that out without this type of measurement.
If we "only" allow 1% distortion and noise, available power shrinks to a trickle:
View attachment 400626
Yes, that is only 2 watts!
Using 8 ohm tap, we get similar results:
View attachment 400627
Sweeping frequencies we see the typical rise in distortion with frequency. But also increase in distortion at low frequencies (transformer saturation?):
View attachment 400628
I am showing both channels. Dashed line is the "good" channel.
Our power on/off test shows instability on top of noise at these events:
View attachment 400629
Fortunately if you wait a minute or so, everything stabilizes:
View attachment 400630
Conclusions
The Yaqin MC-84L made a very positive impression on me with its modest size and super nice industrial design. And reasonable price for such tube products. Performance though, set a new record with respect to how bad it is, taking over the slot for the worst measured amplifier to date. The amp has 42 reviews on Amazon with average of 4.5 stars. Folks must be very tolerant of noise and distortion out there!
I do like the company honesty when it comes to power rating and even SNR.
Needless to say, I can't recommend the Yaqin MC-84L valve amplifier.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
I can tell you that it will sound muddy and then distort like hell when you crank it up at all. I passed on doing that test because people complain that you have to have the "right" speaker for such amps....Really curious how this would sound
Did you listen to it? How does it sound?Specs:
Spec:
AC Voltage: AC115V and AC230V optional
Output Power: 2x12W(7ohm--8ohm)
THD:≤2%
S/N Ratio:≥80db
Frequency Response: 6Hz--90kHz
Input Sensitivity: 250mV
Input Signal Level:≤300mv
Max Power Consumption:≤90w
Tubes: 6P14x4pcs, 12AX7Bx2pcs
Size:320*275*150mm
Net Weight:10kg
Features:
- A High-Quality Tube Amplifier: Despite its affordable price, the Yaqin MC-84L amplifier is a remarkable audiophile-grade ultra-linear push-pull, full Class A tube amplifier.
- Premium Grade Construction at a Fair Price:a majority of the components are of audiophile grade, produced by some of the best companies in the industry . MKP capacitor for reducing AC to DC voltage,famous Shuguang tubes:12AX7B, superior magnet wires on the transformer core,top-quality output transformer, high-quality volume potentiometer.
- Impressive Sound: This amplifier delivers pristine audio quality, making it an exceptional addition to your sound system; Push-pull Circuitry: This design ensures minimal distortion, optimal efficiency, and high power output.
- Powerful Output: It is only 12 watts per channel, but compared to transistor amplifier, it actually can output more than 60 watts.
- Outputs: The amplifier can function as either a headphone amplifier (with a 6.3 mm headphone output) or as a high-quality tube amp capable of driving loudspeakers.
Yes, it would probably need a high efficiency speaker.I can tell you that it will sound muddy and then distort like hell when you crank it up at all. I passed on doing that test because people complain that you have to have the "right" speaker for such amps....
What?Features:
- Powerful Output: It is only 12 watts per channel, but compared to transistor amplifier, it actually can output more than 60 watts.
When measured in a similar way to modern hi-fi transistor amps it's only 2 watts, not 'more than 60'!If we "only" allow 1% distortion and noise, available power shrinks to a trickle:
View attachment 400626
Yes, that is only 2 watts!
…… which would not help either.Yes, it would probably need a high efficiency speaker.
Have you been to the moon?Did you listen to it? How does it sound?
Look those issues up, you'd be surprised how very poor they were - In any case, many D70s that found their way here, blew up very expensively I was told by an (distributor) Ab Sounds dealer at the time...I've got those (HFC) somewhere, if only I knew where... I remember Martin being very fond of conrad-johnson and Audio Research. The SINAD might've been mediocre, but quite a bit better than this one, and didn't they produce respectable power? I might even have considered giving them a try if the price wasn't so far out of my league.
Ah, Krell, another brand I was interested in, but again, too pricey for me.For what might be worth, in 1999 I auditioned extensively a CJ integrated tube amp vs a Krell KAV-300i. The price was equivalent, the store was pushing for the CJ. Through my ears the Krell was superior on every count (besides being way more powerful). I bought the Krell and it served me well until I moved on to class D (Amirm’s fault ).
- unbeknownst to many - was recorded with some sort of tube equipment in the signal chain for added warmth and other qualities. So whether we like it or not, the music we listen too will most likely have distortion - whether it is added by our amplifier, or baked into the recording.