- Thread Starter
- #61
While this is generally true, monitors with excellent directivity show up well here. The HS8 is not such so shows that it can have room dependency.For a near-field monitor, the predicted in-room response is not overly relevant.
While this is generally true, monitors with excellent directivity show up well here. The HS8 is not such so shows that it can have room dependency.For a near-field monitor, the predicted in-room response is not overly relevant.
Yeah, sorry. I mixed direct and in-room response in my headI don't see how. This is the response again:
![]()
It is not an even lift above 2 kHz. There are two peaks and a valley between them. If you just pull them down with 2 dB, you will then have a hole from 5 kHz to 8 kHz.

Found this measurement, probably by Yamaha themselves:What many don't know is that the HS is Yamaha's entry studio monitor series, they have also their top range which have are more expensive, have larger waveguides and probably also measure better:
15Hz deeper bass extension, much wider sweet spot
This is an anechoic measurement from Audio magazine. Don't know how reliable these are but maybe gives you an Idea:I see the A5X model has been tested, anyone knows where to find measurements for the A7X model?
Yeah, the bass is probably the only thing since this Neuman is only a 4 inch woofer.15Hz deeper bass extension, much wider sweet spot

Now that it is on spinorama.org it is even easier to compare the Yamaha HS8 (800 usd / pair) x Kali LP-6v2 (500 usd / pair).I think I would get the Kali LP6v2 for that budget and save to get something better like Neumann KH 120 II later.
Kali Audio LP-6v2 (Second Wave) 2-Way Studio Monitor Review
Kali Audio LP-6v2 2-Way Studio Monitor Reviewwww.erinsaudiocorner.com
The HS3, HS 4, HS 5 and HS 7 are all ported. See the images below from Yamaha's website.The original NS10 were sealed. Their current smaller HS are sealed.
I wonder what this one would sound like with the port plugged? The measured LF response with the port is good for that size speaker, but the distortion measured from the port is significant.
Thank you to the ASR member who sent the speaker for testing. There is a universe of this type near field monitors for home studios and they are not expensive. It would not be surprising for pro studios to have them on the console bridge to look like NS10s.
The measurements are a clue to translation for owners of these speakers.
FWIW, I have owned the original Adam A7 speakers for about 15 years. They still sound great and obviously very reliable.I've used the previous model, the HS-80M, for more than 20 years. I bought them brand new for €250 each.
In comparison, the model I own has more EQ possibilities + HPF even though it doesn't seem to extend as low as the reviewed model.
I was thinking about swapping them for a the ADAM A7X that second hand you can buy them for €450. Is it worth the change?
I see the A5X model has been tested, anyone knows where to find measurements for the A7X model?
If they are good enough for the professionals .........