• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Yamaha HS5 Powered Monitor Review

D

Deleted member 12642

Guest
FR response for HS line, as listed in Yamaha brochure (HS8 seems to be the flattest):

View attachment 57959

I've owned the 5's and the 8's. Man the 5's were really awful, just totally unlistenable for me. No low end to speak of, a mid range that gave me a headache within minutes, and a pretty muddy top end. I then tried focal alpha 50 and they were good but I felt like they were scooped and I was missing some of the mid range. I'm on hs8 now and I really like them aside from their mid range directivity bloom. They don't sound anything like the 5 or 7's IME. The 8's imo are the only ones worth spending money on. I also removed the limiter on mine and I did a quick listen to one speaker with the limiter and one without and the difference was obvious, wish I had gotten some measurements because I'm skeptical of these kinds of mods. I bet most people would pick the hs8's over a lot of speakers if they had a chance to hear them.

Only wish my room were bigger so I could get a bit farther from them and have better low end. I hate even being in a small room let alone playing music in one.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,654
Likes
240,846
Location
Seattle Area

maty

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
4,600
Likes
3,170
Location
Tarragona (Spain)
Yamaha HS8

https://forums.whathifi.com/threads/yamaha-hs8.100445/post-1070544

Thin walls, as usual in more cheap active monitors. Further improvement margin.

yamaha-hs8-back-open.jpg


234332.jpg
 

majingotan

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 13, 2018
Messages
1,529
Likes
1,801
Location
Laguna, Philippines
There are normal measurements and there is Amir. Plus I am sure the weight of an HS7 on his chest is not comfortable :) .

HS7s aren’t even heavy. The Adam S5V OTOH
 
D

Deleted member 12642

Guest
There are normal measurements and there is Amir. Plus I am sure the weight of an HS7 on his chest is not comfortable :) .

The measurements presented there certainly more than adequate if you were implying they are not.
 

SpaceMonkey

Active Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Messages
225
Likes
214
The measurements presented there certainly more than adequate if you were implying they are not.
They are mostly sufficient. Although, I prefer the ones where frequency responses at different angles are on the same graph and THD is in percent. Also, Amir is building a good body of Klippel research on speakers so HS7 would be a good addition to it as well (he bought the speaker ages ago).
 
D

Deleted member 12642

Guest
They are mostly sufficient. Although, I prefer the ones where frequency responses at different angles are on the same graph and THD is in percent. Also, Amir is building a good body of Klippel research on speakers so HS7 would be a good addition to it as well (he bought the speaker ages ago).

If those measurements aren't enough for you to make an assessment about the speaker then perhaps you aren't really understanding the measurements.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,654
Likes
240,846
Location
Seattle Area
If those measurements aren't enough for you to make an assessment about the speaker then perhaps you aren't really understanding the measurements.
Presentation of information matters a lot. There are other sources of information but even I have trouble making sense out of them sometimes. Lot of effort goes into stitching a story of a speaker's performance as I write the review.
 

F1308

Major Contributor
Joined
May 24, 2020
Messages
1,059
Likes
917
Presentation of information matters a lot. There are other sources of information but even I have trouble making sense out of them sometimes. Lot of effort goes into stitching a story of a speaker's performance as I write the review.

How funny...I was planning to get a pair of HS8 for my keyboard....I'll wait for a while...Thank you.
 

Maiky76

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
446
Likes
3,754
Location
French, living in China
Hi,

Since the Yamaha HS5 is always in the mix;) when is comes to affordable monitors,
There should be plenty of DAW EQ plugins or equivalent (EQ APO?) available to add the EQ on the cheap.

Here is my take on the EQ:

Note that the data looks coarser than the latest measurements, so take these with a grain of salt.
Score when no EQ applied: 3.04,
Yamaha HS5 No EQ Spinorama.png


EQ design:
Code:
All PEQ   
     Freq        Gain     Q
     183.0,    -0.60,   1.42,...
     573.0,    -3.00,   1.87,...
     970.0,    -6.63,   2.30,...
    1210.0,    -1.94,   5.67,...
    2858.0,    -2.97,   2.37,...
    5198.0,    -4.57,   1.55,...
   11934.0,    -4.75,   2.05,...

Yamaha HS5 EQ design.png


Score when EQ applied: 6.22,
The loudness level is decreased quite a bit, so one would need to adjust the level when doing A/B comparison.
Decreasing the mids and HFs mechanically makes the LF relatively stronger but at same SPL in the midrange the speaker is loosing dynamic range.

Yamaha HS5 EQed Spinorama.png


Here is the regression with and without EQ somewhat similar to tonal balance:
The speaker "personality" is most probably gone...
Yamaha HS5 EQ Tonal Balance - Regression.png


And the 3D plot of the horizontal directivity without EQ (EQ do not change that):
Yamaha HS5 3D surface Horizontal Directivity Data.png
Yamaha HS5 2D surface Directivity Contour Data.png


And the direct comparison of the metric contributions, quite an improvement!
Just keep in mind the dynamic range bit.
Yamaha HS5 EQ Radar Plot.png


M
 

Attachments

  • Yamaha HS5 3D surface Vertical Directivity Data.png
    Yamaha HS5 3D surface Vertical Directivity Data.png
    996.9 KB · Views: 157
  • Yamaha HS5 Reflexion data.png
    Yamaha HS5 Reflexion data.png
    220.7 KB · Views: 158
  • Yamaha HS5 LW data.png
    Yamaha HS5 LW data.png
    230 KB · Views: 142
  • Yamaha HS5 Normalized Directivity data.png
    Yamaha HS5 Normalized Directivity data.png
    391.2 KB · Views: 163
Last edited:

musictracer

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Messages
40
Likes
27
I would appreciate it if anyone could help me with this. I am trying to understand whether I got a faulty pair of hs5's lately. I took close (30 cm) and further (1m) measurements in large living room. My point of interest is the area between 500 - 1100 hz where I sense there is a difference between the normal hs5 freq response and my perception. I feel that mine emit more 600 and 700 hz information than what they are supposed to and maybe a bit less in the 900-100 hz as well. I kind of feel like their mid boost is tuned a bit lower than it should. When I listen to music there are times I feel like I want to cut the 600 or 700 hz a bit to as vocals tend to sound muffled in this area.. Interestingly this doesn't seem to be the case according to the measurements, yet they really do seem different than the response they should show according the manual. Could my room really make such a big difference in that particular area of the mids ? (Please ignore the excessive high frequency information. It is a mic issue when working in omni mode.)

2020 hs5 l-r captions.jpg
 

Hayabusa

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Messages
833
Likes
575
Location
Abu Dhabi
I would appreciate it if anyone could help me with this. I am trying to understand whether I got a faulty pair of hs5's lately. I took close (30 cm) and further (1m) measurements in large living room. My point of interest is the area between 500 - 1100 hz where I sense there is a difference between the normal hs5 freq response and my perception. I feel that mine emit more 600 and 700 hz information than what they are supposed to and maybe a bit less in the 900-100 hz as well. I kind of feel like their mid boost is tuned a bit lower than it should. When I listen to music there are times I feel like I want to cut the 600 or 700 hz a bit to as vocals tend to sound muffled in this area.. Interestingly this doesn't seem to be the case according to the measurements, yet they really do seem different than the response they should show according the manual. Could my room really make such a big difference in that particular area of the mids ? (Please ignore the excessive high frequency information. It is a mic issue when working in omni mode.)

View attachment 80215

Weird indeed. I assume you dont have any closeby objects/walls during the measurements?
 

musictracer

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Messages
40
Likes
27
Weird indeed. I assume you dont have any closeby objects/walls during the measurements?
No, no walls, or large reflecting surfaces. The floor definitely gets involved, but I placed a pillow to reduce the mid freq interference. Nevertheless, I doubt this interference can justify such a significant response deviation. I have taken measurements in the past in my - smaller - mixing room using a different mic as well and the results were more or less similar to these in this particular area of the spectrum. I guess the best way would be to make a direct comparison with another pair side by side.
 

F1308

Major Contributor
Joined
May 24, 2020
Messages
1,059
Likes
917

BYRTT

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
956
Likes
2,454
Location
Denmark (Jutland)
.....(Please ignore the excessive high frequency information. It is a mic issue when working in omni mode.).....
Are you shure that microphone is not the one that makes the frustration, also if in measurement chain one use a build in sound card in a notebook then sometimes those cards have some software filters enabled that improve sound on the small notebook transducers but will distort and make weird curves used as a measurement device, below is your curves overlaid to Amir's spindata..
Musictracer_800mS.gif
 

musictracer

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Messages
40
Likes
27
Return them and get another pair...Good luck.
I saw sellers offering them in pairs so as to grant "same sound", which in the end made me look elsewhere. Same goes for HS7,
I have them for over two years now. They both sound similar so it is not a matched pair issue. Most likely it is a faulty batch.
The ones you linked is the bit pricier new edition which guaranties matched frequency response. But that's not my case as they seem more or less matched. I didn't return mine in the first place as I thought their sound was the original one. I lately heard another pair in a shop and think they sounded less muffled to me, I sent an email to Yamaha today. Hopefully they reply soon.
Are you shure that microphone is not the one that makes the frustration
I have taken measurements in the past with another mic and the results were similar in the particular area of interest. The current mic specs are these:samson.jpg
also if in measurement chain one use a build in sound card in a notebook then sometimes those cards have some software filters enabled that improve sound on the small notebook transducers but will distort and make weird curves used as a measurement device,
I use Audient Id14 and Maudio Omnistudio Usb for my measurements. No filters involved in the chain.


below is your curves overlaid to Amir's spindata..

A great way to compare directly! Thanks a lot!
 
Top Bottom