Reserved.
2nd order on both drivers but crossover frequencies overlap over an octave? WTF! (Extreme care in manufacturing though...)
I guess there is no xover at all on the woofer, simply a baffle step corrector eq filter.2nd order on both drivers but crossover frequencies overlap over an octave? WTF! (Extreme care in manufacturing though...)
I would love Amir testing his ML amp.. We have been waiting for this a long timeAm I the only one more interested in Amir's Mark Levinson amp than the speaker being tested?
Mark Levinson? The Carolina Herrera of audio?I would love Amir testing his ML amp.. We have been waiting for this a long time
I've not read up any makers blurb, but increase tweeter output a bit more and you have a cheaper facsimile of a typical LS3/5A curve with peaked up 1.5kHz region, another bump at 120Hz or so and a bit of a rough ride in the tweeter which was deliberate in the BBC model to emphasise hisssssss in the programme material (this from one of the original design team telling me years ago)In this case using the name of LS3/5A is merely a kind of sexual agression... Intelectual property should be better protected...
A small woofer 4" or 5" sacrifying bass provide a huge help.Interesting though that as such poorly engineered design the directivities are better than I would have expected, guess rather a lucky coincidence?
I owned a jr149 clone in these days and founded one of the best balanced speaker i ever owned. The resonance you mention in the 1,5kz was sadly an issue with Bextrene cones that the designers of the xover had do struggle with, with good results Imho.I've not read up any makers blurb, but increase tweeter output a bit more and you have a cheaper facsimile of a typical LS3/5A curve with peaked up 1.5kHz region, another bump at 120Hz or so and a bit of a rough ride in the tweeter which was deliberate in the BBC model to emphasise hisssssss in the programme material (this from one of the original design team telling me years ago)
Yes, also the small distance of the driver centres and high crossover frequency.A small woofer 4" or 5" sacrifying bass provide a huge help.
I doubt it. There is an extra capacitor there. It looks to me a coil and capacitor pair for each driver but naturally I may be wrong. I’m thinking in engineering terms whereas this speaker was designed with wishful thinking.I guess there is no xover at all on the woofer, simply a baffle step corrector eq filter.
The resonances chown on the woofer side also reveal its mediocre performance (typical of cheapo paper cones) and coloured tone.
Curious inspiration source, the bbc being the less sexy sound i have ever heard...I doubt it. There is an extra capacitor there. It looks to me a coil and capacitor pair for each driver but naturally I may be wrong. I’m thinking in engineering terms whereas this speaker was designed with wishful thinking.
The headlines on their website tells their priorities:
Audio that excites the senses and viscerally touches the soul - eXtremely Sexy Audio
The Vanguard Speaker - a fresh interpretation of the classic British bookshelf monitor with a bolder and sexier a sound.
No, of axis doesn't look good either. I may quote Amir:Regarding the drivers, DC130 is the cheapest Dayton s 5" midwoofer, whereas RST28 is a better looking tweeter of the same brand.
Maybe the difference between the measurements made by Amir and those made by the designer are due to the fact that the xover is not optimized for on axis response, a smoother one being obtained at 15-30° off axis
Where do you see that?No, of axis doesn't look good either.
Where do you see that?
Dont agree, except 0° on axis, these are all averaged measurements around 0°, as is listenning window for example.In most of the parameters on the first graph.
And this alone is enough to make it a bad speaker. At least in my book.Where do you see that?
The only thing that remains clear is that the predicted in room response is still disapointing and tonal balance not sexy at all...