Seeing this result, along with those cited earlier in this thread, reinforces my impression that we need a set of measures that explain more of the variance in preferences and subjective reactions to speakers.
Smoothness of response, or the lack of it, doesn't explain enough.
Hi Fi news praises the following in these speakers
:
"Doc plays trumpet, and I knew it would reveal as much as anything I could feed the Lowther Almiras. As with Herb Alpert albums, his arrangements of 'Fever', 'Monday, Monday' and other standards or hits-of-the-day are big band interpretations which use the entire bandwidth of a system.
As expected, the Almiras had no trouble conveying the crisp, sharp staccatos on the livelier tracks, such as 'Trumpets And Crumpets', the undeniable speed of the transients as hot as you'd want them to be. When the music turned slow and moody, however, the lack of deep, massive bass deprived the kettle drums on 'Fever' of their weight and presence. It was frustrating, because I heard so much of the old Lowthers in there, waiting to escape.
Looking Forward
A better performance came with Confederate Railroad's eponymous debut [Atlantic 82335-2], one of my favourite 'modern country' albums (although it's now 30 years old). 'Trashy Women' lilted along, as sardonic as ever, the pedal steel crystal clear. And why this venerable album? Because what I unfashionably call 'redneck bass' is about twang, not bulk, and it did nothing to embarrass Lowther's Almira."
So, these sound like the strong suits of
horns in the midrange and treble, where the frequency response is very uneven, but not in the bass, which doesn't seem to engage.
In my early days as an audiophile (1960s, 1970s) people felt fine about using tone controls, with which one could smooth out gross anomalies in response. Now we have Audyssey, Dirac, and Trinnov (in ascending order of effectiveness??), so some improvement in smoothness can be had, but little, if anything, can be done to provide, "
undeniable speed of the transients as hot as you'd want them to be," and
"crisp, sharp staccatos on the livelier tracks."
Here we have the truly horrible looking frequency response of the
improperly placed (IMO) Klipschorn,
up on a furniture dolly,
outside, with
no boundary gain, and probably
no room gain, under circumstances that would probably reduce bass response about 6 dB below that of Klipsch's "in close proximity of a room corner, but toe-in permissible."
Klipschorn, Some EQ, sealed in corner, 1/6 octave smoothing, one microphone position (
not recommended)
sub takes over below 60 Hz (sub curve not shown), so, when sub is used, Klipschorn frequencies below 60 Hz are made to roll off at about 12 dB per octave, compared to what is shown in this graph.
Same as above but with 8 mic positions averaged, response above 43Hz only, with room curve similar to Harmon speaker/room curve, 1/3 octave smoothing.
To my ears, this sounds about right for orchestral music, and I love the precise transient response, ultra dynamic sound, detail, and as a friend put it, "free floating" sound.