• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Worst measuring loudspeaker?

Heinrich said:
... and still there are deviance by a dB or even two in predicted versus real in-room (which?!).
Click to expand...

Red = In-room, 4m.

A difference of 1-2 dB is small when it comes to acoustic measurements (we’re not talking about amplifiers or DACs here), and having such a good match between an estimated in-room response based on quasi-anechoic data, and a ”real” in-room measurement shows that the science works.

I measured the in-room response in my living room, without acoustic treatment.


IMG_6560.jpeg


IMG_6561.jpeg
 
1744203969561.png
Vienna Acoustics baby grand. I still have a pair of Beethovens circa 2001 and despite the funky measurements I can't find anything I prefer for what I could get for them.
 
Ageve said:
A difference of 1-2 dB is small when it comes to acoustic measurements ...
Click to expand...
O/k, nice read the standard, thanks really!

I can't agree, though. I won't start an argument anyway. Maybe I'm too critical by education.
 
Ageve said:
Red = In-room, 4m.

A difference of 1-2 dB is small when it comes to acoustic measurements (we’re not talking about amplifiers or DACs here), and having such a good match between an estimated in-room response based on quasi-anechoic data, and a ”real” in-room measurement shows that the science works.

I measured the in-room response in my living room, without acoustic treatment.


View attachment 443147

View attachment 443148
Click to expand...
Yes, I am always surprised how well those EIR match measurements I have done at the LP above 500 Hz in different rooms, some exemplary:

www.audiosciencereview.com

Dutch & Dutch 8c Review

I say Amir should change his plots. ;) fair enough! anyway, thanks for your service mentality, appreciated. maybe over the the time, some deliberate ASR standardization concept will emerge from discussion, that would be great. I think standards should never only follow path dependency.
www.audiosciencereview.com www.audiosciencereview.com

www.audiosciencereview.com

Neumann KH 310A Review (Powered Monitor)

This is a review and detailed measurements of the Neumann KH 310A active monitor (speaker). It was kindly sent to me by the company for testing. I see it discounted to US $2,200 (each) as of this writing. This is one dense and heavy 3-way speaker: I was relieved to find "rack mount" ears...
www.audiosciencereview.com www.audiosciencereview.com

www.audiosciencereview.com

KEF LS50 Bookshelf Speaker Review

Can it really be such a huge difference? Yes, IME. The position of speakers, room contents and carpets makes more difference to the sound than any of the equipment, but is less fun to mess about with...
www.audiosciencereview.com www.audiosciencereview.com

Of course under extreme conditions like too large or small listening distance and/or room reflectivity that difference can get bigger, but for typical normal/decent ones for high fidelity listening they work nicely.
 
I realize it's likely not possible for these old measurements, but I would love to know what the room dimensions and speaker locations were in each case.
 
How do the ‘pro’ Amphion models measure, they have impedance and FR ( 10dB) on their site but that’s about it.
And they don’t use ‘impure’ DSP!
Keith
 
Bjorn said:
I can't believe Stereophile is still using completely outdated polar graphs. They need to update both their software and their measuring techniques.
Click to expand...
I'm sure they will upgrade to only subjective reviews sometime soon, the measurements must be getting in the way of the florid prose.
 
Purité Audio said:
Stereophile’s review of Ampion’s ‘Krypton’ not awful but I was expecting better.

Amphion Krypton 3X loudspeaker Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements
www.stereophile.com www.stereophile.com

Keith
Click to expand...

"Krypton3X is Amphion’s reference project 25 years in the making. This highly innovative 3-way reference loudspeaker allows you to enjoy full range, realistic orchestral performances without owning a concert hall" - Amphion Marketing

Reference indeed
 
Last edited:
Bjorn said:
I can't believe Stereophile is still using completely outdated polar graphs. They need to update both their software and their measuring techniques.
Click to expand...
Over 30 year old software. Actually nearer to 40 years. Simply amazes me. REW, now ARTA is open for download. ARTA is very fully featured. And REW is quite a step above MLSSA.
 
Did these big Raidho speakers, measured by stereophile, make it in here yet?

1749356556357.jpeg


https://www.stereophile.com/content/raidho-td38-loudspeaker-measurementsThey

1749356589847.jpeg


1749356629273.jpeg

Yikes!

I once had a chance to have an extended audition of the smaller Raidho C.2 speakers.
I was intrigued because at an audio show I’d heard some fairly astonishingly realistic operatic vocals coming from one of their speakers.

However, when I had a chance to spin a lot of music on the Raidho they sounded like… well exactly like the frequency balance in those graphs. Apparently it’s a house sound they go for… they’re trying to create some sort of balance that they see is re-creating a sort of mid hall perspective on acoustic instruments. Ultimately, I think it makes them a one-trick pony. Because I found the emphasis in the bass and the obvious scoop out in the presence region to be quite frustrating and too coloured. All sorts of my favourite tracks felt obnoxious in the bass region and lacking presence and dynamics in the upper mids. One of the more disappointing speakers I listened to.
 
Last edited:
MattHooper said:
Did these big Raidho speakers, measured by stereophile, make it in here yet?
Click to expand...
Quite bad indeed. But looking at the impedance graph, I bet a single series resistor before the tweeter crossover (or a larger value resistor if there is one already) could make the speaker much more neutral in the frequency response. Because where the frequency response bump lies for the tweeter, there is an impedance response valley.
 
MattHooper said:
"... the obvious scoop out in the presence region to be quite frustrating and too coloured. All sorts of my favourite tracks felt obnoxious in the bass region and lacking presence and dynamics in the upper mids."
Click to expand...
Just to compare semantic notes, what range is now considered "presence?"

My old Martin Mayer book "High Fidelity," published in 1958 (I keep it right next to my remnants of the Dead Sea Scrolls) "presence" was defined as being centered on 5KHz. Just now I looked on Google, and they have it at 4KHz to 6KHz ... agrees with Mayer, some 67 years later. The REW graph header agrees. My old ears find it as 4KHz to 8KHz. Anyway, the two graphs you reproduced from Stereophile, show a peak from 4KHz to 10KHz, of about 3ish dB to 4ish dB, higher than anywhere else above 3.5Hz. What range do you hear as "presence?"
 
garyrc said:
Just to compare semantic notes, what range is now considered "presence?"

My old Martin Mayer book "High Fidelity," published in 1958 (I keep it right next to my remnants of the Dead Sea Scrolls) "presence" was defined as being centered on 5KHz. Just now I looked on Google, and they have it at 4KHz to 6KHz ... agrees with Mayer, some 67 years later. The REW graph header agrees. My old ears find it as 4KHz to 8KHz. Anyway, the two graphs you reproduced from Stereophile, show a peak from 4KHz to 10KHz, of about 3ish dB to 4ish dB, higher than anywhere else above 3.5Hz. What range do you hear as "presence?"
Click to expand...

Sorry, but my use of the term “ presence” there wasn’t as clear as it could’ve been.
What I was thinking of is when I listened to those speakers how all sorts of instruments that lent excitement in many tracks I love - for instance in some Latin tracks - sounded subdued. The slapping of hands on bongos, the impact of timbales, handclaps etc… they lacked presence in terms of jumping out with the power and vividness I was accustomed to.
I could sense there was a scoop out in the relevant frequency range which made those instrument sound more recessed and slightly more dull. I’m thinking probably somewhere within the 1 - 5k range.

I don’t have the measurements for the smaller model I listened to. But it had a very distinct trough in the frequency response. If my memory is at all accurate, it would suggest that the frequency I response I heard was very much like that bigger Raidho shown above, but perhaps the depression extended a little higher, or started a little higher. But the general sense of such a gap was similar. As was the sense of boosted bass for a sense of impact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Floyd Toole
  • Sticky
Why evaluating the sound of a single speaker is essential
25 26 27
Replies
537
Views
41K
amirm
amirm
F
Multitone Distortion, Measurement and Evaluation
2
Replies
24
Views
1K
Rja4000
R
C
Monitor Audio Silver 200 Speakers
Replies
7
Views
2K
genesisaudiorack
genesisaudiorack
S
Home Theatre Upgrade Discussion
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
6K
AVphile
A
2Sunny
Is there an ongoing discussion of phantom centers?
2 3
Replies
49
Views
3K
beagleman
B
Back
Top Bottom