• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

World Cup 2026 Thread

The referee is clearly, CLEARLY, underperforming.
 
And a clear penalty kick after the crossbar hit! WTF is this nonsense!
 
A running incident. Bellingham puts his own foot in when the Norwegian is clearly first to the ball.
 
:D
 
I’m still trying to get my arms how the fact the goal kick hit the cable, materially changing the trajectory (falling right in front England) leading to a goal was missed …. :facepalm:

How does VAR not review that..
 
Worst. Referee. Ever.

And now: go on, England! Wipe the floor with the Argies and then go on to win!
 
England in - Norway out
1000006402.jpg

Nice game
 

Attachments

  • 1000006402.jpg
    1000006402.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 26
I’m still trying to get my arms how the fact the goal kick hit the cable, materially changing the trajectory (falling right in front England) leading to a goal was missed …. :facepalm:

How does VAR not review that..
At 46'? I went back to see the replay but somehow I can't see it. Sure will make pple talk.
 
Alright I saw that. I have controversial thoughts on this. But the rule wasn't followed.
 
What's crazy when you think about it is that we have a chip in the ball which can sense a players' couple of hairs and can't sense when the ball hits a cable. This game still needs big improvements.
 
What's crazy when you think about it is that we have a chip in the ball which can sense a players' couple of hairs and can't sense when the ball hits a cable. This game still needs big improvements.

Well, I was sort of hinting at one of the problems with this (maybe not here, but elsewhere) is that we now have this technology that doesn't seem transparent. It was the same with an offside situation a few games back where there was a lot of discussion about the sensor indicating a hit by one player, shown on screen on a graph, but not showing the hit right after by a different player. Rules aside the fact that not both hits were shown was a problem. Not because the second wasn't obvious, it was, but because if the first one wasn't a hit then the second indication could have been implied to have been on the first header that didn't happen. Therefore showing both, despite the second being irrelevant as far as rules go, would have been more transparent.

So the conspiracy theorist in me thinks that this guarded technology just makes it more possible to "tilt" games by selectively applying the technology available.
 
Back
Top Bottom