• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

World Cup 2026 Thread

"And Marx is arguing it was offside!"
 
This thread has become obsessed.
 
How are we feeling about France/Morocco tomorrow?
 
Morocco has slipped under my radar, so I'm very excited to see them show their wares against the absolute best.
 
How are we feeling about France/Morocco tomorrow?

I think the French are going to win. If the Moroccans win, I would be over the moon. I have nothing against the French ... but like I said upthread, I would love to see someone other than the traditional football powers to lift the cup this year.
 
Last edited:
Here's what I'm thinking about
It's the first time in the tournament they appoint 5 referees of the same nationality, they're all argentinians, and they're gonna referee us... Wtf anyone?
Also...
 
Last edited:
France Paraguay was one of the worst refereeing I've seen in my lifetime in a World Cup, and also the most toxic game I've seen.
One of the worst... don't forget the the Italy–South Korea match in the 2002 WC, the referee seemed to hesitate before awarding fouls in Italy's favour—as if he was waiting for authorisation.

Maybe those are the new, more conveniently flexible rules... A push here, a shove there and you're through. We saw it in the Brazil–Norway match as well; the Norwegians kept nudging and muscling Brazilian players out of the ball's path.

I think the French team's main issue is psychological. Just think back to the previous World Cup final against Argentina—mentally, they only woke up at the very end of the game (and then levelled in 10 mins flat!). What they need is a sports psychologist or mental-performance coach: someone who can boost their confidence and provide strong mental support (perhaps they should borrow whoever the Germans relied on for so many years).

If they can get their heads right, though, they seem virtually unbeatable.
 
Last edited:
Here's what I'm thinking about
It's the first time in the tournament they appoint 5 referees of the same nationality, they're all argentinians, and they're gonna referee us... Wtf anyone?
Also...
It's a new twist on the old football saying.
It used to be:
"Football is a simple game: two teams, 11 players each chase a ball for 90 minutes, and in the end Germany wins."

The 2026 WC update might be:
"Football is a simple game: two teams, one with 11 players and the other with 11 plus a few extra helpers, chase a ball for 90 —and in the end, France loses.";)
 
I disagree, strong mental is the european teams' trademark, and France was mentaly very strong with what happened Vs Paraguay.
 
Here's what I'm thinking about
It's the first time in the tournament they appoint 5 referees of the same nationality, they're all argentinians, and they're gonna referee us... Wtf anyone?
Also...
1000006368.jpg
 
Interesting to compare the effectiveness of officiating at the World Cup with the 5 rugby internationals that were played last Saturday that I watched.

The biggest thing for me is the absolute respect for the ref (addressing them as 'sir') in rugby vs a shouting/angry mob constantly in the referees face (Mexico were atrocious in that regard) in football.

The rugby TMO (television match official) works alongside the on-pitch team and balances alerting the ref to egregious errors with unnecessary and disruptive interruptions.

Not perfect, but seems like a much more mature process and one I hope football can learn from wrt VAR.

Importantly, the discussion between the ref and TMO is totally transparent and their thought process / decision can be heard by the spectators. It's not perfect and mistakes are made , but it seems a lot more effective than the VAR right now.

The yellow card in rugby and 10 minute sin bin seem more effective as a means to make players think about consequences before they foul. There is also an off field review process during the match where the yellow can be upgraded to red if sufficient thresholds are met.

I wouldn't claim it's perfect, but rugby is way more complex to manage for an official, but international referring standards seem to be a bit higher regardless ... just my opinion. Wonder what others think?
 
Interesting to compare the effectiveness of officiating at the World Cup with the 5 rugby internationals that were played last Saturday that I watched.

The biggest thing for me is the absolute respect for the ref (addressing them as 'sir') in rugby vs a shouting/angry mob constantly in the referees face (Mexico were atrocious in that regard) in football.

The rugby TMO (television match official) works alongside the on-pitch team and balances alerting the ref to egregious errors with unnecessary and disruptive interruptions.

Not perfect, but seems like a much more mature process and one I hope football can learn from wrt VAR.

Importantly, the discussion between the ref and TMO is totally transparent and their thought process / decision can be heard by the spectators. It's not perfect and mistakes are made , but it seems a lot more effective than the VAR right now.

The yellow card in rugby and 10 minute sin bin seem more effective as a means to make players think about consequences before they foul. There is also an off field review process during the match where the yellow can be upgraded to red if sufficient thresholds are met.

I wouldn't claim it's perfect, but rugby is way more complex to manage for an official, but international referring standards seem to be a bit higher regardless ... just my opinion. Wonder what others think?
I'm just giving a thumbs up for rugby in general.

Interesting point about the way referees are treated.
 
Well you know the saying, rugby, a sport of thugs played by gentlemen, football, a sport of gentlemen played by thugs.
Yellow card 10 minutes off rule? I'd just like to see them experience it at some point.
Also regarding the communications I've heard they were planning to make them public for more transparency
 
Back
Top Bottom