And most of them are blood mixed, good exemple with Mbappe his father is french of camerounese origin, his mother is french of Algerian origin. Olisé NigerianXalgerianXfrench. These kind of blood mixings cannot happen in Northern Africa due to very high & traditional racism, they're typically french or western.
They were born and raised in France, why would they want to play for any other team?And most of them are blood mixed, good exemple with Mbappe his father is french of camerounese origin, his mother is french of Algerian origin. Olisé NigerianXalgerianXfrench. These kind of blood mixings cannot happen in Northern Africa due to very high & traditional racism, they're typically french or western.
But most importantly, they could play for any team in the world, they chose France
Well, life is complicated and there may be many things at play.
www.lemaroc360.com
Well, Olisé was born and raised in the UK.
I wonder how many goals had fouls at the beginning of action where VAR was never called in.
There was a big foul, without that foul there wouldn't have been this egyptian movement, however nice it was.
That's the problem. As far as I can tell there's zero transparency on exactly how the decision is made to go back and check.
Frankly, if you've seen the France Paraguay match, you see it can go both ways. The referee was totally one sided during the game, didn't say anything while the paraguayans were throwing punches left and right, didn't see a first penalty, and only had to acknowledge de obvious second only because of the VAR, the VAR saved football that day. In the end without VAR we would have a referee making more mistakes. But I see your point, mine is that it's not the VAR, it's just how it's being used, and I think you agree with that.
Oh, a Dutch guy complaining about Argentina. How original!I watched the Argentina–Egypt match, and Egypt had a perfectly legal second goal disallowed.
After 60 years of watching football starting on black and white TVsI have little faith in FIFA. Under Infantino's openly corrupt questionable leadership, I wouldn't be surprised if those five Argentine referees found a way to help Morocco against the France team. In a match that's likely to be decided by the smallest margins, one or two controversial decisions can make all the difference.
No offence to the Moroccan team they've been playing excellent football and certainly don't need any favours
It's the owners who set the rules for there enterprises, so maybe something fishy is going on for Frances next game. I understand the same kind of thing happens in all of big money sports.
It was a red card.
Yes and I'm referring to the Argentine refs. Like this thread, let's move on.
You're preaching a converted, FiFA is corrupted, I've been saying just that all along this thread. But it doesn't mean that if an argentinian referee gives a red card to a french player, he doesn't deserve it. We have to use the principle of parsimony here (and everywhere actually). If I see a lot of things happening outside of the rules, then and just then I'll start to make conspiracy theories
.
Okay, but back a few posts it seemed like you were the one saying conspiracy. Sorry if I got that wrong. So far a great World Cup.You're preaching a converted, FiFA is corrupted, I've been saying just that all along this thread. But it doesn't mean that if an argentinian referee gives a red card to a french player, he doesn't deserve it. We have to use the principle of parsimony here (and everywhere actually). If I see a lot of things happening outside of the rules, then and just then I'll begin making conspiracy theories
Man back a few post i said consider the fact that the rules were perfectly applied here before making conspiracy theories. That's a typical application of the principle of parsimony.
