I missed the recovery. I was out riding my bike. Bummer!
They are quite cheap, don't worry. Send some of Bokassa's diamonds and you are done.I just learned that the Morocco-France game is gonna be refereed by 5 argentinians. That is VERY shady, expect really shady stuff.
Forgive me but after the France-Paraguay quagmire, I got reasons to get paranoïd.
No need to invent a conspiracy theory, it was a strict respect of the rule
More a factual statement than an argument Prof.It's not the good argument you think it is, it's more of an own goal here.
A factual statement quoted as a proof is de facto an argument.More a factual statement than an argument Prof.
I don't know what more I can say. You don't seem stupid so I must conclude you're refusing to understand what I wrote.It's all the same in pro sports, too much money at stake and it is entertainment. No one is policing it. There is no legal requirement for a fair outcome, only revenue and entertainment. That point was made and you said inventing conspiracy. Without trying to be rude, haven't recent events shown that to everyone? It's true in most high money televised sports.
I like this thread and watching the World Cup.
And which part of my statement is not factual?A factual statement quoted as a proof is de facto an argument.
You really are doubling down as moderator.A factual statement quoted as a proof is de facto an argument.
The USMNT team had zero to do with that. The political backlash should not remotely touch them. In fact I venture it distracted and weakened the USA team.I am genuinely sad that you feel confused. A head of state using their influence on a sporting event. You think that's ok because everything worked out ok... Jesus wept
Sorry but it was only controversial in the US. The average european has watched 1000+ games and played 100+, and nobody I know would tell you it's not an obvious red card.
You got to have a strange relationship with reality to say this isn't a red card
View attachment 543486
I watched the Argentina–Egypt match, and Egypt had a perfectly legal second goal disallowed.The problem here is many are confusing two separate issues and hence confuse:
1. "I don't like the law on ankle contact. "
with
2. "The referee misapplied the law."
I personally answer 1 with "yes" but 2 with "no".
I have little faith in FIFA. Under Infantino's openly corrupt questionable leadership, I wouldn't be surprised if those five Argentine referees found a way to help Morocco against the France team. In a match that's likely to be decided by the smallest margins, one or two controversial decisions can make all the difference.It is very factual. It's also an own goal. Will you see it?And which part of my statement is not factual?
I'd root for France if it wasn't for Morocco being the only African team left, and the only clear underdog other than Norway. I'll 100% root for France in the next game if it beats Morocco though.
23 of the 26 in the French squad were born in France One was born in the UK one in Italy and one from Uganda I think, maybe CongoDon't worry, half the French team are African
My workmate from Cameroon thinks that Africa is a hidden football superpower, at least on par with South America and Europe. The reason it isn't is because the developmental programs aren't there because governments are so dysfunctional.