• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Wolf's Measurements of SMSL M200 DAC

WolfX-700

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 26, 2019
Messages
537
Likes
4,510
Location
China
This device (SMSL M200) should have been on the market for some time? From the price and model system of SMSL, this is an inexpensive device (279USD?). Considering the discussion in the forum, I applied for a sample for measurement.

Photo.jpg


Rear.jpg


In terms of design and workmanship, there is really nothing to say-normal level.
AKM4497, balanced output...

The question now is... Measurement results

Dashboard.jpg


Although the value of SINAD is good here, we can see some other problems-it seems that due to the "low cost" of digital circuits, we can find some side lobes in the FFT. This high probability indicates that the device's own jitter performance is not good (I measured the COAX and Opt inputs, and the problem still exists)

DashboardRCA.jpg


DashboardCOAXRCA.jpg


Dynamic-Range---No.jpg


Linearity-(-20.jpg

THD+N-Ratio.jpg

SMPTE-Ratio.jpg

FFT-Spectrum.jpg
 

ModDIY

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
669
Likes
440
Location
Canada
It's weird, on the SMSL website you can see a measurement made of the M200, and the FFT looks better and also SINAD and dynamic.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2020-06-08-07-45-24.png
    Screenshot_2020-06-08-07-45-24.png
    830.3 KB · Views: 1,373

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,311
Location
China
Would you try different sampling rates?
 
OP
WolfX-700

WolfX-700

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 26, 2019
Messages
537
Likes
4,510
Location
China
It's weird, on the SMSL website you can see a measurement made of the M200, and the FFT looks better and also SINAD and dynamic.

I am responsible for the measurement result of the sample at hand: SN32771X
 

ModDIY

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
669
Likes
440
Location
Canada
So the sample differs from the DAC you finally received.
 

ShiZo

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
837
Likes
560
Weird. I got sent the m400 meaurements early and they were pretty spot on compared to 3rd party comparisons. Wonder what happened here.
 
OP
WolfX-700

WolfX-700

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 26, 2019
Messages
537
Likes
4,510
Location
China
So the sample differs from the DAC you finally received.
Their DNR measurement seems to use the standard setting (with CCIR weighting), and I started using the unweighted setting a long time ago.

This will also affect the measured value of DNR
 

ModDIY

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
669
Likes
440
Location
Canada
With a linear power supply rather than SMPS, we could perhaps reduce the jitter?!?
 

ShiZo

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
837
Likes
560
With a linear power supply rather than SMPS, we could perhaps reduce the jitter?!?
Personally i don't think that's it, but I'm not the most knowledgeable person around these parts.
 

M0du1e

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2019
Messages
20
Likes
4
Location
Russia
Right about time, I almost pull the trigger on combo M200 + SP200. Thank you, will watching this thread for further explanations.
 
OP
WolfX-700

WolfX-700

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 26, 2019
Messages
537
Likes
4,510
Location
China
Right about time, I almost pull the trigger on combo M200 + SP200. Thank you, will watching this thread for further explanations.
It should be noted that I am not accusing M200

In fact at the corresponding price, it's not bad
 

ModDIY

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
669
Likes
440
Location
Canada

It is disappointing on the part of SMSL. I bought the M200 because M300 was not easily accessible, thinking that the performance would have been close to the M300.

But I like the sound of the M200 and also its Bluetooth. I find it very detailed and silent. Then it can depend on the resolution of the files. In my case, these are mostly 16-bit files except a few in 24-bit.

Despite this the measures are not top compared to others. My first idea was the Topping D50s.
 

gvl

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2018
Messages
3,530
Likes
4,133
Location
SoCal
Why would anyone care about lobes at -130dB buried in noise? Can you also test jitter at 12khz? Multitone isn't the cleanest but okay at this price point and feature set. Seems like a decent device overall.
 

VeerK

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2019
Messages
258
Likes
318
Location
NYC
It’s an okay product, but I don’t necessarily see the appeal vs something like the Topping E30. Nice for SP200 owners to have the option of a matching DAC though
 

XeNoNF50

Member
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
33
Likes
15
It’s an okay product, but I don’t necessarily see the appeal vs something like the Topping E30. Nice for SP200 owners to have the option of a matching DAC though

For me it was the LDAC bluetooth that sold it. Was a non-negotiable, very important to me in my downstairs set up - allowing me to connect headphones to my TV sound using LDAC when needed. It's nice that it will match my SP200 though.
 
Top Bottom