What do you see wrong with the Jitter test? It seems very good to me. Also Amir comments no audible problems with it.I only ask a few questions ...for understand ... :-0
has mr amirm:
is it common to observe such a powerful sinad at 1k but a rather disappointing j-test?
would a difference, even if upstream, in wifi frequency protocol in certain cases not influence the results in particular in j-test?
possible to the extent and as a precaution, to check it quickly each time?
impact of the toslink with j-test?( which has never had good press among audiophiles.. but has come back strong on streamers etc..)
(ps
the small harman also seems to offer a very good sinad in optic at 1k.. but you don't give a j-test measurement.. could have been interesting ;-) )
to the people working for this wiim who read us:
do you have any answers to these questions?
maybe there is firmware side to dig that will explain these results? to interview your experts?
can be something to study on the firmware side which could improve the little wiim on the jitter side which it seems to me is quite high... even if we know that a consumer product...?
a little challenge....
;-)
sorry for my """""""english"""""
For wifi affecting sound quality. In my experience it's only throughput and stability. If I am playing a 24/192 size file I tend to need a 5ghz connection to pass the file fast enough for it not to starve the player. For mp3 2.4ghz is fine for me. There is no impact to sound quality from wifi itself. Tcp/ip has error correction and retry to ensure no packets are lost in transmission. It's only if something in the chain is resampling that you can get into differences in the final music file.