You share the biggest ignorance , none of you know what a transient is ...
Someone who posts once, and is never seen again?
You share the biggest ignorance , none of you know what a transient is ...
I'm tempted to say 'hopefully'.Someone who posts once, and is never seen again?
Sure my dear expert compatriot , why are you focusing so much in distortion and noise ?
Link some actual data, peer-reviewed papers, etc and then we can discuss.Sure my dear expert compatriot , why are you focusing so much in distortion and noise ?
What do you think about about brands that claim transient response is important ? like Focal , Kartesian ( French woofer manufacturer , says that transient response is the most important factor for speaker ) , PSI audio CH brand ( "superior transient behaviours" ... ) ... and the same thing for some amplifier brands ...
I'm not here to "troll" people , but I don't really understand why people on this forum ( and all of forums ... ) do not take into consideration this point which seems major to me in the reproduction of sound ...
Ok sure , you have the youtube channel Kartesian that I think do a great job to explain woofer behavior :Link some actual data, peer-reviewed papers, etc and then we can discuss.
Random claims are not worth discussing. Neither yours, nor those from brands trying to sell you their stuff.
Anything worthwhile is worth publishing. Anything that's not published is likely a waste of time, and will be forgotten before long.
Transient reproduction in amplifiers has been discussed on ASR, but mostly in that it is not an issue with any well designed amplifier as long as it has sufficient power and has a frequency response as wide as necessary to reproduce the human hearing range. Amps are not slow, woofers might be. If you know an amps power and its frequency response you can tell if it can handle transients.What do you think about about brands that claim transient response is important ? like Focal , Kartesian ( French woofer manufacturer , says that transient response is the most important factor for speaker ) , PSI audio CH brand ( "superior transient behaviours" ... ) ... and the same thing for some amplifier brands ...
I think that they are right. But as you say, these are drivers manufacturers. This topic is about an amplifier. What standards do actually exist to measure transient response, regarding analysis of electronics (Amps, DACs and so on) ? I do not know one from either AES, CEA, IEC or AP.What do you think about about brands that claim transient response is important ? like Focal , Kartesian ( French woofer manufacturer , says that transient response is the most important factor for speaker ) , PSI audio CH brand ( "superior transient behaviours" ... ) ... and the same thing for some amplifier brands ...
I think that they are right. But as you say, these are drivers manufacturers. This topic is about an amplifier. What standards do actually exist to measure transient response, regarding analysis of electronics (Amps, DACs and so on) ? I do not know one from either AES, CEA, IEC or AP.
Transient response and frequency (+phase) response are effectively the same thing. One can be derived from the other, and vice versa.Well I totaly agree with you ... there are no "standards" ( at all ) that 's the main problem...
There is some really good info and charts about attack transients (sound onsets), rapid decay transients (sound offsets), fast transitions (portamentos) and noise/chaotic regimes in this paper:Transient response and frequency (+phase) response are effectively the same thing. One can be derived from the other, and vice versa.
How about you answering a question: What does a real musical transient look like. What instrument produces the most transient like signal, and what does that look like in the time domain?
Depends of your speakers. And if you know their impedance curve...Compared to the original I'm surely not going to notice the difference...am I?
Can't safely interpret this for you (still learning), but someone can: https://www.alpha-audio.net/review/review-wharfedale-diamond-12-2-bright-like-a-diamond-en/4/Thanks for the info. My speakers are Diamond 12.2. I can't find an impedance curve on Google, just that they are nominal 8, minimum 4. If anyone knows more on those speakers I'd appreciate it.
Thanks. Can anyone interpret these graphs for me? I get the distortion criticism but I can't figure out if this shows the speakers would be affected by the Wiim Amp's frequency variance.Can't safely interpret this for you (still learning), but someone can: https://www.alpha-audio.net/review/review-wharfedale-diamond-12-2-bright-like-a-diamond-en/4/
The impedance stays below 8 Ω above 2k, so you should be OK. Even lower would have been ideal, but no big deal.Thanks. Can anyone interpret these graphs for me? I get the distortion criticism but I can't figure out if this shows the speakers would be affected by the Wiim Amp's frequency variance.
Short version: I don't think it's anything to worry about, and if you are worried the Wiim has PEQ to fix it.Thanks. Can anyone interpret these graphs for me? I get the distortion criticism but I can't figure out if this shows the speakers would be affected by the Wiim Amp's frequency variance.
Assuming that Alpha Audio measurements are correct, then yes, it should be most likely fine.No significant issues, related to impedance.