Mike_Trueman
Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2024
- Messages
- 73
- Likes
- 23
Would nice to see a battle!
WiiM Amp Pro vs Denon Home Amp vs Marantz Model M1
WiiM Amp Pro vs Denon Home Amp vs Marantz Model M1
Any reason to get the WiiM Ultra over the WiiM Pro Amp if this seems to do it all minus the display?
I already own the WiiM ultra and its great, but seems like the new WiiM Pro Amp can do the same thing plus its a power amp. My speakers are 90db efficient too.
No, since this thread is about the upcoming WiiM Amp Pro it's more likely that @DearSX really meant any reason between WiiM Ultra and WiiM Amp Pro.Maybe you meant any reason between Wiim Ultra vs Wiim pro plus. Answer is no substantial reason. One could have been XLR outs, but they are not there in the Ultra. Maybe next release?
I do mean the new WiiM Pro Amp vs the WiiM ultra streamer....Maybe you meant any reason between Wiim Ultra vs Wiim pro plus. Answer is no substantial reason. One could have been XLR outs, but they are not there in the Ultra. Maybe next release?
The WiiM Ultra does not support AirPlay 2. It's still unknown if the WiiM Amp Pro will.AirPlay: Both support AirPlay 2.
Judging from what WiiM had on display during the Munich High End fair (and the general similarities with the WiiM Amp) there will not be any headphone output on the Amp Pro (except for Bluetooth).Headphone Amplifier:
- WiiM Ultra: Includes a high-fidelity headphone amplifier (TPA6120A2).
- WiiM Pro Amp: No specific headphone amplifier is mentioned.
You can compare these numbers, but it doesn' make too much sense because it does include the power amp section of the WiiM Amp Pro.Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (THD+N) (Analog Out):
- WiiM Ultra: 0.00018% (-115 dB)
- WiiM Pro Amp: 0.0005% (-105 dB)
The current WiiM Amp actually supports exactly the same bass management features as the WiiM Ultra. Variable low pass and high pass crossover frequency, level, absolute phase (polarity) and delay of either sub or mains (actually variable phase control). It would be surprising if the Amp Pro did worse than the Amp here.Subwoofer Output:
- WiiM Ultra: Features comprehensive bass management with adjustable crossover frequency, level, phase, and latency.
- WiiM Pro Amp: Subwoofer output is available but with less detailed management features.
You did recognize and value the main disadvantage of the WiiM Amp Pro: It's not available yet, so we don't know nothing for sure.Yeah, it sounds like the WiiM Pro Amp is the better deal overall if you don't need a headphone amp, display or phono. Too bad it's not out yet also they need to fix the load dependency, my speakers are 6 and 8 ohms.
ps. I fixed the airplay part above.
The amp seems more user friendly for a main system unit that many will use. I could plug the WiiM Pro Amp into my TV then my speakers directly and sub, apply EQ and stream music from Qobuz all from the $370 amp in high resolution and very low noise. I do really like my WiiM Ultra with trigger out and nice display though.
EQ where?Even with speakers potentially "problematic", EQ can be used to mostly overcome the problem.
Can you not measure the frequency response (electrically, at the amp terminals) with the speaker as a load and use that to EQ to flat? (It is a question)EQ where?
Up high?It's not gonna happen without a full spinorama including the effects of the whatever dependency as any correction above transition has to be based on anechoic data.
It's not as simple.
The proper way calculating the effect (and then correcting) is at this thread at great detail (also a great read) :Can you not measure the frequency response (electrically, at the amp terminals) with the speaker as a load and use that to EQ to flat? (It is a question)
Yes,that's what I'm saying in a way.I didn't imply it was "simple". But are you going to say that load dependency will make EQ harder to perform with regards to spinorama data? In that case I don't understand why this should be the case. To me it's the same general problem of what EQ can and should fix.
I agree with most everything you say. It's just that I'm still with @MCH here.Yes,that's what I'm saying in a way.
Not exactly that the EQ will be harder,but the whole process,it;s not exactly easy to obtain anechoic data,cause the ones existing will no longer represent the FR in the most audibly sensitive area.
Sure one can obtain some good quasi-anechoic data following the guide here as well as obtaining the electric data using DATS,etc.
But will it worth the time,the effort and the questionable result?
And another,not all speakers can be EQ'ed high even if one obtain anechoic data (the same data will show if it can or not) ,in fact only the nicely made ones can.
I would happily recommend it, even for 85dB speakers because it is going to be able to go plenty loud enough for most people in most size rooms.So with 85db sensitivity speakers probably not recommended, unless near field conditions meaning less than 3ft from the speakers!
No. The response there will be very flat. The ripple in the response is almost entirely the speaker and room effects.Can you not measure the frequency response (electrically, at the amp terminals) with the speaker as a load and use that to EQ to flat? (It is a question)
What are you talking about? The room has absolutely nothing to do with it. This is an effect purely between the amp and its load.No. The response there will be very flat. The ripple in the response is almost entirely the speaker and room effects.