• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Wifi VS Ethernet for streaming quality

cable looks ******
wifi looks invisible
wifi 1: 0 cable
Well.... That's one way to look at it... But most devices needs power anyway... So you aren't getting rid of all the cables that easily, so why not make them look good or organize them neatly?
Besides, as already mentioned, depending on your specific needs and likes, chose either or both options respectively. I use both, because it's very easy to hide a cable along my panels for my streamer, but of course my phone - which I control my streamer with - definitely is wireless.... Unless it needs charging ;)
 
I live in an apartment building surrounded by other apartment buildings (a row of brownstone townhouses in New York City) and suffer frequent wifi streaming cut outs on my Denon 3700. Running an ethernet cable would be a major pain due to the logistics. It is super frustrating.

My best hypothesis is it's due to nearby network traffic. Damn guy working from home downstairs must be transferring massive documents!
I would try a ethernet cable for a period of time to test if its your building's internet connect or a wifi issue. If you still get issues over ethernet then not much you can do, it's building internet. However, if ethernet fixes it, it would suggest your wifi is your problem, and plenty you can do.

If it's wifi, switching from 2.4 to 5 GHz might help? Or switching wifi channels? Or disabling 5 GHz and only using 2.4 (or vice-versa)... Or even getting a smarter router, something like Ubiquiti has intelligent wifi channel scanning.
 
1 floor Ranch Style home is mist common here (some times a hallway like a bowling lane wit 5 bedrooms).
But, in my case, no cell phone signal gets here. (Nor do I want it to). The nearest neighbor is a 1/2 mile away. Since the area is now protected from any more structures being built on both a state and federal level, it's not likely to change anytime soon. I am the last place on the power grid and get 30 amps of service.
But the benefits are HUGE (Hunting, fishing and trapping provides supermarketless food, farmers markets provide the rest):
View attachment 513623
And limited access keeps the riff raff away:
View attachment 513625
Looks amazing! What internet speed do you get or are you on StarLink?
 
Wireless charging is a beautiful thing
Indeed it is. Though, I also believe that you have to consider simplicity, and a cable is just so very simple compared to WiFi.
Quite a few I know, have several annoyances WiFi 'falling' out, disconnecting and being way slower than cable, depending on placement and the materials of the walls surrounding the router and receiver. This often result in the need for an extension cable to move the WiFi receiver 2-5m away from the PC, to have a better signal, and then WiFi suddenly seems like a bad option, unless a cable between the PC and router is very difficult or visibly obstructive.
But I agree, that with most quality products and proper setup, a WiFi connection can work well enough, and with streaming audio, we need much less data than with 4K tv, for example.
 
Looks amazing! What internet speed do you get or are you on StarLink?
Neither at that location, it's in a forest, tree cover pretty much eliminates StarLink (both there and my home in the City [you cannot locate either place using google earth maps, they both just appear as a field of green [at my city home you can see all about 2/3 of my neighbors homes with Google Earth]) but mine is part of the 1/3 that you cannot see from above.
At the city home, I use a WiFi to cell tower phone # cannister antenna. It works fairly well but is no speed demon.
We haven't (at my wife's suggestion) had a TV since we were living in Saipan & Guam in 2007. So we do not stream.
I have a TECHNICS SL-M3, an oppo 205 UDP, a 32" Samsung monitor for the desktop in the City and a DUAL 1229, SONY 500 CDR & a CD/Blu Ray/4K capable laptop with internal drive & HDMI out at the pictured location.
I've got around 600 albums and about the same amount of CD's, DVD's, Blu Ray & 4K disks.
I probably won't get to them all again within my lifetime, so...
My wife & I travel too much. We expect to be out of the country again for 5 months this year.
When I was younger I made 9 trips to Europe.
In 2001, I told my parents that I'd be gone a couple of years: after 14 trips through the Panama canal and getting married (the first and only time: at the age of 48) in Saipan in 2005, I finally came back (with my wife) in 2018.
 
Last edited:
Indeed it is. Though, I also believe that you have to consider simplicity, and a cable is just so very simple compared to WiFi.
Quite a few I know, have several annoyances WiFi 'falling' out, disconnecting and being way slower than cable, depending on placement and the materials of the walls surrounding the router and receiver. This often result in the need for an extension cable to move the WiFi receiver 2-5m away from the PC, to have a better signal, and then WiFi suddenly seems like a bad option, unless a cable between the PC and router is very difficult or visibly obstructive.
But I agree, that with most quality products and proper setup, a WiFi connection can work well enough, and with streaming audio, we need much less data than with 4K tv, for example.
I think our experiences do not align. My experience is that wifi is vastly more simple than cables, which can get in the way, become unplugged, collect dust, etc. My wifi never disconnects, maybe you live in a developing place with poor internet or perhaps you just have an obsolete router or internet supplier? This stuff about wifi receiver's proximity to a PC is completely alien to me, never heard of such a thing much less experienced it.
 
Neither at that location, it's in a forest, tree cover pretty much eliminate StarLink (both there and my home in the City [you cannot locate either place using google earth maps, they both just appear as a field of green [at my city home you can see all about 2/3 of my neighbors homes with Google Earth]) but mine is part of the 1/3 that you cannot see from above.
At the city home, I use a WiFi to cell tower phone # cannister antenna. It works fairly well but is no speed demon.
We haven't (at my wife's suggestion) had a TV since we were living in Saipan & Guam in 2007. So we do not stream.
I have a TECHNICS SL-M3, an oppo 205 UDP, a 32" Samsung monitor for the desktop in the City and a DUAL 1229, SONY 500 CDR & a CD/Blu Ray/4K capable laptop with internal drive & HDMI out at the pictured location.
I've got around 600 albums and about the same amount of CD's, DVD's, Blu Ray & 4K disks.
I probably won't get to them all again within my lifetime, so...
My wife & I travel too much. We expect to be out of the country again for 5 months this year.
When I was younger I mad 9 trips to Europe.
In 2001, I told my parents that I'd be gone a couple of years: after 14 trips through the Panama canal and getting married (the first and only time: at the age of 48) in Saipan in 2005 and I finally came back (with my wife) in 2018.
Wow interesting, hadn't heard of Saipan & Guam so have just been googling them!
 
I think our experiences do not align. My experience is that wifi is vastly more simple than cables, which can get in the way, become unplugged, collect dust, etc. My wifi never disconnects, maybe you live in a developing place with poor internet or perhaps you just have an obsolete router or internet supplier? This stuff about wifi receiver's proximity to a PC is completely alien to me, never heard of such a thing much less experienced it.
Don't mix up poor internet with wifi issues, very difference problems.
 
This thread is very 1999.
 
This stuff about wifi receiver's proximity to a PC is completely alien to me, never heard of such a thing much less experienced it.
You're clearly not living in the equivalent of a concrete bunker then. I've had to deploy an auxiliary accesspoint to the furthest room in my not very big office which would have had marginal coverage (even on 2.4 GHz) otherwise, due to both signal strength and outside networks (urban area). The signal would have to travel kind of a J- or U-shaped path otherwise, which is not helping.

Side note, the more recent WiFi standards are optimized for progressively smaller cell sizes at 5 GHz. In order to get the most out of them, you almost need one AP per room. The power consumption of those adds up, too. I would make sure that high-priority areas have got one nearby at least (as in 2-3 m tops).
 
I upgraded to wifi6, but turns out the far corner of my house is still only reachable by 2.4GHz at 6 to 20mbps.
 
You can have bad hardware too. I have a Denon DRA-900H that fell flat on its face on WIFI. Roku could stream 4K all night while the Denon would work for a while but then start skipping and even stop. Fortunately putting it on the LAN fixed the issue.
 
100% what @john61ct wrote. But a minor quibble: you can just as easily use Cat5e or regular Cat6
I reco spending the little more, for future proofing.

The added cost will be a small fraction of the job total.

In my case having drywall patched and a proper paint job was 70+% of the job, the labour of pulling the cable was 20%, total materials was under 10%
 
Last edited:
My Tri-band WiFi 6 router is located inside a 1200 sqft concrete basement under a larger single story main floor. That one unit easily covers both spaces as well as 20 feet out into the yard with a strong enough signal to support Qobuz streaming. While being closer to the router can offer higher speed benchmarks, for normal audio playback you can only tell there is a problem if range is exceeded. They offer multiple WiFi units using a Mesh network but as one unit provided adequate coverage I never added more.

I previously had a Linksys 8300 WiFi router that offered as little as 20% of the speed in a direct comparison, and it could not reach some areas of the home. The age and quality of the WiFi router makes a HUGE difference in wireless signal strength.

In addition, the WiFi receiver on your computer, TV, and audio gear can limit range and performance. If it's up to date with WiFi 6 capability the user will likely experience few connection issues. My six year old 65" TV works great but the WiFi receiver was showing its age. Adding an Apple TV 4K 128GB upgraded it's WiFi capability to match the Tri-band WiFi 6 router.

While dense building materials can make a difference in WiFi signal, the WiFi router technology improvements available in the last few years are massive. Just as SSD brought ultra fast copy sessions to our computers, WiFi 6/7 removes most traditional connection barriers of the past. Cutting the cord has never been simpler. If you want maximum speed and range WiFi 6/7 routers and receivers will be required.
 
I think our experiences do not align. My experience is that wifi is vastly more simple than cables, which can get in the way, become unplugged, collect dust, etc. My wifi never disconnects, maybe you live in a developing place with poor internet or perhaps you just have an obsolete router or internet supplier? This stuff about wifi receiver's proximity to a PC is completely alien to me, never heard of such a thing much less experienced it.
We have places here in Denmark with armed concrete, metal doors and alu foil isolation, that will also kill even a cell phone signal to the point where communication via speech is impossible.
Also WiFi can degrade to half or 1/3 of the speed over a distance of 5-7m, since not everyone has top notch equipment.
The few that have WiFi 6 mesh are getting better... But it still varies quite a bit. My now old Asus rt66ac router starts to struggle a bit now. Even at 4m in a direct open line, I have way less than optimum speed.
But good for you that you live in great surroundings all the time :D
By the way... I've never had a cable fail ;)
And don't get me started on wireless printers :facepalm:
 
Back
Top Bottom