Good video from GoldenSound explaining how measurements can be altered intentionally and unintentionally and how comparable they are.
In this range the estimation / conformation bias from the person doping the test has more influence...I get quite the kick out of people comparing -120db to -125db when making buying choices ... neither will be audible!
have you even seen the the video?t isn't necessary to "trust" measurements for them to be useful.
It's just necessary to be able to reproduce them (or not).
Who says you shuld?Why should I trust Darko, Guttemberg and the rest of the gang
It isn't necessary to "trust" measurements for them to be useful.
It's just necessary to be able to reproduce them (or not).
have you even seen the the video?
the whole point is that you can not reproduce them if you have only the view dashboard screenshots.
Of cause you need "trust" in measurements this is normally done by giving an uncertainty estimation.
That is the gain all cranked to 11.You can't trust ANY of them! They're ALL on steroids!!
Oh wait... wrong forum. Oops.
Damm now am I suppose to watch a video (clicks) from somebody who chickend out of a blind test and behaved himself like a turd.
Nah I am not gonna watch him and give him any attention.
Damm now am I suppose to watch a video (clicks) from somebody who chickend out of a blind test and behaved himself like a turd.
Nah I am not gonna watch him and give him any attention.
Search this forum on Goldenone and find out..Sounds juicy, what's the story?
In this range the estimation / conformation bias from the person doping the test has more influence...
And things like inter sample clipping or ground isolation.
Exactly. That is precisely what I use in the form of templates (so you can't overwrite them by accident). You load up the template and 99% of the settings are the same. Yes, there is some room for mistake like measuring unbalanced vs balanced (if both connected), etc. But vast majority of what he talks about is eliminated.The key for AP measurements: project files.
Only if you are sitting there randomly messing with the dials to measure things. Doing so will quickly get you in trouble the first time a manufacture challenges your measurements. Then the truth comes out that you were gaming the measurements and you will be done with anyone trusting you.In this range the estimation / conformation bias from the person doping the test has more influence...
Is it a coincidence that you describe the sound heard at every live rock concert I have attended.All my test tracks sound "noisy", "cranky", "boomy", "nauseatingly distorted", "grinding", "opaque", "abhorrent"