Hi
A pet peeve of mine... I've come to always use subtitles. and you
@Blumlein 88 , please don't get me started on Christopher Nolan
. I believe we are a strange disconnect. People in the movies industry are not too clear on what they have to achieve. I sincerely believe the demands are too often contradictory. There is, what I would call, a Youtubization of video production, a YouTube aesthetics and production philosophy... You have those close-up with wide-angle lenses, those "bokeh" simply for the sake of it, those people talking with a dongle microphone as being their trademarks, etc...
I was reading about this in an ( NYT?) article and this actually predate all of these. Back in the early days of non-silent movies, the microphones were not very sensitive and the actors had to shout a bit, theatre-style to make the dialogue heard and intelligible. Technology improved and microphone became more sensitive and the actors ddin't focus so much on their enunciation and speech s... then came sound effects and ..
I don't believe this to be a case of using better speakers and you will get better dialogue... If it is not mixed properly, better speakers will simply reproduce what is in the signal.. low dialogue level that is drowned by the (very entertaining for me) effects and soundtracks. Sometimes you set a good level where dialogue is good and intelligible then... have to precipitously reduce the entire system level because of the effects...And of course you lose the dialogue... If it is one of the latest Christopher Nolan movies, no amount of gain riding and level handling will make the dialogues clear...
@Blumlein 88 ...
I believe this issue will soon be addressed, as it has now become mainstream, and no longer the annoyance for a small group of nerds/outliers.
Peace