MattHooper
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 10,944
- Likes
- 19,437
how did it pay off
More power and control for larger speakers or more complex loads.
congrats for nothing
Huh?
how did it pay off
congrats for nothing
8 stereo amps (6 identical [2 identical), all of which can be (and usually are) used as mono blocks. (Also a pair of identical preamps), 4 FM tuners, multiple pairs of speakers (but only one pair of homebuilt passive subs) here. Also, multiple UPS's.Many believe in 'separates'... for many a reason.
These are just fringe groups who take 'separates' to another level.
Looked at it from a different perspective: Monoblocks prevent a single point failure.
If one of the monoblocks DOA; at least, you can still listen to music in the other mono channel.![]()
That may be less cool to a significant-other!They absolutely look cool!View attachment 440383
???congrats for nothing
I just like to be able to pull out the single broken item when something goes wrong & put in my spare not broken item while I have my item repaired. That way I am not out of a bunch of functions in my system when one item goes bad.Hi-fi is all about, or used to be, having as many separate components as possible(Nowadays that's outdated thinking.)
It's easier to send a small signal than it is to send a large amount of power. Losses in a speaker cable can be significant if the cable is long. Losses would be too little to care about in a small signal cable unless its capacitance is excessive.Good point. But having shorter speaker cables would mean having larger RCA cables, so what's the point?
Hope you resist the temptation to jam a Gibson Les Paul (or a Vox Cheetah, as the case may be) into 'em.Having a stack of tube mono blocks appealed to my inner Who.
View attachment 465569
It's easier to send a small signal than it is to send a large amount of power. Losses in a speaker cable can be significant if the cable is long. Losses would be too little to care about in a small signal cable unless its capacitance is excessive.
+1Mono blocks = wasted space and energy.
I can't hear a difference between a stereo Purifi and a mono Purifi amp.
The only difference was a lighter wallet.![]()
H'mm but it is the aesthetic that I like. So part of my idea of décor. Folks that do not like my décor are certainly not being held hostage, unlike 'Hotel California' they are free to leave any time that they like if my décor bothers them so much.Mono blocks = wasted space and energy.
I call the Nowadays thinking a few things (and brilliant is not usually one of them [though, on a rare occasion, it is]).Hi-fi is all about, or used to be, having as many separate components as possible(Nowadays that's outdated thinking.)
Who is Who?Having a stack of tube mono blocks appealed to my inner Who.
@mhardy6647, didja forget to give a Like to the above comment?Hi-fi is all about, or used to be, having as many separate components as possible(Nowadays that's outdated thinking.)
H'mm but it is the aesthetic that I like. So part of my idea of décor. Folks that do not like my décor are certainly not being held hostage, unlike 'Hotel California' they are free to leave any time that they like if my décor bothers them so much.
Wish mine had meters, though. Maybe one day.
Wasted energy: Just guessing on this: but think that likely it is a debate of it's own and probably has to do with each use case, the efficiency of speakers involved, the room size, and likely many other things.
Not sure that it is true as a blanket statement.
Sounds like an "I heard it on the Grapevine" thing with no actual proof.
Or the proof shows that in many situations but not all.
Who cares!?Actually, two mono amps will always use more power than a single Stereo amp.

2) I must've overlooked it.Who is Who?
@mhardy6647, didja forget to give a Like to the above comment?
So what, if he called us (parenthetical) old farts?![]()