• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Why there aren't pcm1794 dac anymore.

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,292
Location
China
There are still cs4398 dacs but not BB anymore. Old violectric v800, bit newer v880, teac ud501 use pcm1794/pcm1795 and measures very good. Superb thd and outstanding IMD. Is it because people are all going crazy about ess and pcm1794 is relatively expensive comparing to ess non pro models and cs4398?
Also where are cs43131 dacs, only seen on DAPs.
https://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/en/report/dac/teac-ud501-sharp.php
https://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/en/report/dac/violectric-v800-off.php
No discussion of psychoacoustic or audibility please.
 

bunkbail

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2018
Messages
520
Likes
662
@orchardaudio's DACs/streamers use PCM1794 and they measure incredibly good.
 

FrantzM

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 12, 2016
Messages
4,335
Likes
7,717
There are still cs4398 dacs but not BB anymore. Old violectric v800, bit newer v880, teac ud501 use pcm1794/pcm1795 and measures very good. Superb thd and outstanding IMD. Is it because people are all going crazy about ess and pcm1794 is relatively expensive comparing to ess non pro models and cs4398?
Also where are cs43131 dacs, only seen on DAPs.
https://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/en/report/dac/teac-ud501-sharp.php
https://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/en/report/dac/violectric-v800-off.php
No discussion of psychoacoustic or audibility please.

Hi John

Seriously. I don't see how you can ask a question and limit the replies to ...what? If it is more expensive , how can one not discuss about audibility? If that DAC sounds just like the others :confused: ... Are you suggesting that it measures better than the ESS? .. Not that i know if it does. I fail to understand where you want this to go.
 
OP
JohnYang1997

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,292
Location
China
Hi John

Seriously. I don't see how you can ask a question and limit the replies to ...what? If it is more expensive , how can one not discuss about audibility? If that DAC sounds just like the others :confused: ... Are you suggesting that it measures better than the ESS? .. Not that i know if it does. I fail to understand where you want this to go.
We sure can discuss how they sound and stuff. I just don't want to hear people saying there is no difference or it's all in my head etc. I'm kinda towards more technical, objective and/or other realistic reasons.
Form what I have been seeing, harmonic distortion can be as low as pro line from ess and imd is much superior to ess (using spectrum analysis). Noise is a little bit higher but can be designed to be lower etc. Ud501 and v800 are expensive and old, I wonder why there aren't cheaper alternatives (or at least asking if there's any), seeking the reason for this too.
Thanks for reply.
 

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
15,891
Likes
35,912
Location
The Neitherlands
The PCM1794 is a 16 year old design, the PCM1795 a 10 year old design.
That may have something to do with it.
 
OP
JohnYang1997

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,292
Location
China
The PCM1794 is a 16 year old design, the PCM1795 a 10 year old design.
That may have something to do with it.
I agree. There must be something to do with it. But cs4398 is really really old too. But newer designs do adopt cs4398. Probably because those are cheaper and require lower part count?
 

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
15,891
Likes
35,912
Location
The Neitherlands
The PCM1794 is NRND (Not Recommended for New Designs)

Both the PCM1793 and 1795 are still 'active'.

Price and amounts of stock left may be a clue. There are probably enough still around for a series of a few thousands pieces.
 
OP
JohnYang1997

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,292
Location
China
The PCM1794 is NRND (Not Recommended for New Designs)

Both the PCM1793 and 1795 are still 'active'.

Price and amounts of stock left may be a clue. There are probably enough still around for a series of a few thousands pieces.
I think they renewed the design by pcm1794a.
 

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
15,891
Likes
35,912
Location
The Neitherlands
possible .. that one is still 'active' and revised in 2015 (fairly recent).

price is probably a good reason not to use it as well. Companies want to make money and the majority of people want to buy the cheapest possible and like to see the latest DAC chips in their products with a wider format support range.
 

twsecrest

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 27, 2018
Messages
894
Likes
291
Location
California
I agree. There must be something to do with it. But cs4398 is really really old too. But newer designs do adopt cs4398. Probably because those are cheaper and require lower part count?
I believe there has been at least one newer revision, of the CS4398 DAC chip.
 

orchardaudio

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Audio Company
Joined
Aug 24, 2018
Messages
853
Likes
1,242
Location
Succasunna, NJ
The PCM1794A is not end of life. The PCM1794 (no A) is the obsolete one.

Just because its 10+ years old does not mean it's bad. It still beats the pants off most newer DACs.

All of my products use these in monaural mode which is where this chip really shines.

It is a current output DAC so it's harder to work with than voltage output ones.
 
Last edited:

Jimmy

Active Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2018
Messages
255
Likes
167
DACs are a mature technology, the last 'special' BB/TI chip was the multibit PCM1704, from 1998 onwards there hasn't been any groundbreaking advancements, most of the innovation has been targeted towards cost reduction (introduction of sigma delta architecture), new formats, higher sampling rates, which are good things, but they don't change the fact that redbook was enough in the 80s and it still is today, and that we live in a consumerist society where latest is always greatest.
 

FireLion

Active Member
Joined
May 25, 2018
Messages
243
Likes
98
I was just looking at the FX-AUDIO DAC-SQ5 and it uses the pcm1794 along with 3 opamps for $80. I'm tempted to try it to compare to a D30 which I should have next week.
 
Last edited:
OP
JohnYang1997

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,292
Location
China
I was just looking at the FX-AUDIO DAC-SQ5 and it uses the pcm1794 along with 3 opamps for $80. I'm tempted to try it tom compare to a D30 which I should have next week.
That may need extensive modification tho. Do you have measurements equipments? Not necessarily best one but like focusrite etc.
 

FireLion

Active Member
Joined
May 25, 2018
Messages
243
Likes
98
That may need extensive modification tho. Do you have measurements equipments? Not necessarily best one but like focusrite etc.

Modification for what purpose? I do not have any equipment but for $60 posted on Aliexpress I might take a chance.
 
OP
JohnYang1997

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,292
Location
China
Modification for what purpose? I do not have any equipment but for $60 posted on Aliexpress I might take a chance.
Then it will be very hard for you to do comparison between them.
 

Westsounds

Active Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Messages
212
Likes
99
DACs are a mature technology, the last 'special' BB/TI chip was the multibit PCM1704, from 1998 onwards there hasn't been any groundbreaking advancements, most of the innovation has been targeted towards cost reduction (introduction of sigma delta architecture), new formats, higher sampling rates, which are good things, but they don't change the fact that redbook was enough in the 80s and it still is today, and that we live in a consumerist society where latest is always greatest.
Naim use this one in all their high end devices. Rumour has it when it was discontinued they sneakily stockpiled the lot so they could continue to use.

Why are they considered so special?
 
Top Bottom