• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Why most users here HATE all very expensive speakers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This makes me wonder why that is the case. Of course, there are expensive speakers that do not perform well,
You pretty much said it. We've seen crazy good measured performance here and on Erin's site from speakers ranging from $1K - $30K+.

Speakers that cost far more but don't provide any proof of their claims are automatically judged as probably overpriced or worse.

I understand better than most that a given retail price might not guarantee commensurate profits. Running an audio business can get expensive fast.

But if you're charging high 6 or low 7 figures for a pair of speakers, and you can't even point a mic at the speaker in a large room, or scare up $125K for a Klippel, what are we supposed to think? "Trust me bro" does not fly for that kind of money. Pity the people who think it does.

I'd like to believe that the various ultra-expensive speakers are worth every penny. It would be nice to think the upgrade path just keeps going. I just require the same level of proof that speakers costing 1% as much provide.
 
Last edited:
Hello,

from my experience on ASR, almost no very expensive speaker receives broadly positive recognition. A recent example is the new flagship model from Wilson Audio, which is extremely costly. I understand that many people here prefer to rely on measurements or “proof” on paper to validate a speaker’s performance and only a few manufacturers provide such data.

But even brands with a generally good reputation in this community, such as JBL or Genelec, often receive more negative feedback when it comes to their higher-end or flagship models. Their measurements are frequently scrutinized in great detail, sometimes to the point where every possible flaw is highlighted. At the same time, actual listening tests (which could put these measurements into a more meaningful context) are often avoided or dismissed.

There are many threads where not a single participant has heard the speaker in question, yet dozens of people still offer negative judgments.
Yes, I recall you relentlessly picking apart a Genelec 8351B, pointing out possible flaws in the teardown thread, asserting they didn't use enough cabinet stuffing (despite the midrange cabinet being stuffed completely), then scrutinizing every measurement I showed you of the actual effects of stuffing cabinets. It was quite persistent. I was under the impression you don't own Genelec speakers. We all scrutinize stuff here, you too :p . There is a ton of love for Genelec and JBL high end models here. And the low end models too. You can sort the speaker reviews for yourself and see there is a ton of love for good speakers even if they are expensive.
1777091777604.png
 
I would like to se a comprehensive measurement of a set of big magico . They seems to apply some sound design principles.
And do very expensive stuff, superficially it looks like they deliver. But we don’t know ? Do they share their klippel stuff ?

Wilson is just ridiculous , there is a measurement of one of their designs here at ASR the small tone tot , it’s basically broken.

What often happens in the very high end is the quality actually diminishes with price as the product is more like hand built Veblen goods . No real engineering at all just audio woo woo and person cult with guru designers :)

My favorite brand to bash is Audio Note ( the Great Britain variant ) everything they do is based on flaved principles and don’t understanding basic electrical engineering
 
I don't hate it, I simply think they're selling it as a luxury product to a select audience (not ASR!) who are into that sort of thing. The price, and the exclusivity that comes with it, are a big part of the appeal.
Yes, but they're also selling it as an accurate, hi fidelity product, which is almost certainly a lie
 
You describe a specific experience and attribute it to price rather than technical differences. At the same time, you draw a general conclusion from it. I find this problematic and untenable.

In the case of your comparison, the Meridian simply has a significantly higher displacement volume, which, from a technical standpoint, explains the potentially higher maximum sound pressure level. That’s six 8-inch drivers in a phase-compensating configuration, each actively driven and equipped with active high-pass filtering in the subsonic range.

With a diaphragm area of approximately 1,200 square centimeters, it roughly corresponds to that of an 18-inch driver. That’s massive power for a home environment, but it’s explained by the electroacoustics, not by the price.
I’m an audio engineer who designs loudspeakers as a hobby. You know nothing about me and obviously know less about this situation.

The 400W Servo 15 subs were more than up to the task of matching the Meridians. The midwoofer amps were running out (I explained that quite clearly).

If memory serves, the DSP8000s crossover the woofers to the mids around 200Hz. I was stuck with using the onboard 80Hz crossover on the LCR-450s. Had I been able to move that up an octave (160hz) with a 24dB/octave slope, I’d have gotten at least another 3dB dynamic range out of my system… maybe 6dB.

My point is that with two really well engineered systems that are basically flat throughout the range of human hearing that radiate into the room about identically, they will sound almost exactly the same regardless of price.

Mind you, my room sounded way better than the audio store.
 
Thread title is a bit of a blanket statement and blanket statements don't live long.

I personally like expensive speakers (within the speaker pricing range) but that's only because I also like big room filling ones with adequate SPL, etc.

Honest speaker pricing (not the ridiculous cases) goes by extension and SPL (combined) with everything else at check.
No one has managed to avoid that.
 
Hello,

from my experience on ASR, almost no very expensive speaker receives broadly positive recognition. A recent example is the new flagship model from Wilson Audio, which is extremely costly. I understand that many people here prefer to rely on measurements or “proof” on paper to validate a speaker’s performance and only a few manufacturers provide such data.

But even brands with a generally good reputation in this community, such as JBL or Genelec, often receive more negative feedback when it comes to their higher-end or flagship models. Their measurements are frequently scrutinized in great detail, sometimes to the point where every possible flaw is highlighted. At the same time, actual listening tests (which could put these measurements into a more meaningful context) are often avoided or dismissed.
A speaker is nothing more than a purely technical device that converts a voltage into air pressure differences.
How well this performs its task can be captured with a microphone.
Now comes the tricky part.... using 1 microphone on the listening position yields the response of the speaker including the alterations the room makes.
This is what you are listening to. The brain kind-of filters out some of the room's 'additions'. The microphone doesn't.

This is where the Near Field Scanner comes in. This huge device is basically a moving microphone that measured the speaker all around and using software in order to 'ignore' reflections of the room it is placed in.

O.K. so now there is a ton of measurements done all around the speaker (takes quite a lot of time). Those measurements are combined and various plots are created that show how the sound propagates around the speaker. Based on those measurements one can 'guesstimate' how that speaker might/will sound in a near perfect 'living room'.
Your room at home will differ yet again.

This means we now have a comparable set of measurements for speakers and can see how the emitted sound travels in all directions... which matters.
Research also has shown how the best sounding speakers 'measure'.

This is why most ASR readers scrutinize the measurements and fall over every 'flaw'. There is nothing else to go on.
Reason being you can't trust subjective opinions of owners and 'testers' doing that in their home... because of MANY factors.

Besides.... not all expensive speakers (nor headphones nor electronics) get 'negative votes'.


There are many threads where not a single participant has heard the speaker in question, yet dozens of people still offer negative judgments.
Yep, that's what the forum and poll is for.

Interpreting spin data CORRECTLY requires quite some knowledge about acoustics and knowing what your room does.
Let's face it, there might be a handful of members that can. The rest just looks for 'imperfections', looks at the price and concludes if it is worth it.
There is no room for 'taste' nor how it might really sound where it is placed and how.

This makes me wonder why that is the case. Of course, there are expensive speakers that do not perform well, and sometimes this can indeed be identified through the standard measurements. However, there are also exceptional speakers that are very costly but deliver phenomenal sound quality at least in some categories like sound stage, live like dynamics or... To truly appreciate their capabilities, it is necessary to listen to them in person and experience what they can do!
How likely is it that every reader on ASR (or elsewhere) gets to audition each expensive speaker (as well as electronics) in their own listening room for at least a week or so.
.... Exactly ... zero chance. Even listening to those speakers in some demo room will NOT tell you how it will sound at home.
This is why people express their opinion without hearing it.
They do this based on what they (think) they know and with their wallet in mind.

Also when an expensive device (speaker or not) has not been measured using an NFS or similar 'spin' (there are more ways to skin a cat) even then people form an opinion. Even without having any data other than what they read. Sure... that is just an opinion.
You can ignore as it may be founded or non-founded. All people will always have an opinion... true or not.


My somewhat critical assumption is that many people here may have limited experience listening to a wide range of state-of-the-art loudspeakers, and possibly also limited exposure to the sound of real instruments. Only a small number seem to regularly visit dealers, manufacturers, or live acoustic concerts to explore different approaches to audio reproduction.
Oh sure ... no argument there.

Nevertheless, many participants appear very confident in judging speakers—often in a negative way.

I don’t intend to offend anyone with these remarks. However, I do feel that this approach may lead people in the wrong direction and prevent them from ever experiencing great sound.

Best regards
Thomas
You might well be right.
What is your proposal ...
Only owners can vote or may pass judgement?
In that case threads may be very short (other than people asking questions) and those owners will pass judgement how that sounds in their room to them.
It will include acoustics in their room and their preference.

Nah.... all we have here is measurements and opinions of readers/responders.
It's a bummer if an owner that bought it because they liked it sees it is burned down to the ground by some folks that did not hear it. I suggest they get over it soon and instead of reading the replies simply ignore other people's opinions and enjoy what they hear.

So basically your beef is with yourself... you need to realize not all people will feel the same as you and opinions differ but everyone has them and base it on the 'information' they have.
In the case of expensive gear the experience they have is not hands-on.
Hate ? envy ? lack of knowledge ? who cares other than the reader that has their own differing opinion ?

HATE (especially when shouting) is a very strong word where in reality it isn't hate but disappointment.
 
Last edited:
There are many threads where not a single participant has heard the speaker in question, yet dozens of people still offer negative judgments.
Easy to do and perfectly valid if the speaker measured like crap.
Even more so if it was expensive.
We don't go down the "sounds good to me" path with products that are highly inaccurate.
If that's what your into there are plenty of subjective sites where the keyboard warriors at the helm are totally without integrity. They'll push and rave on products with big price tags and advertisement dollars to spend, that don't sound any different than 1965 designs. And their rabid members are like sheep hearing exactly what the "golden ears" tell them what they'll hear.

Thread title is a bit of a blanket statement and blanket statements don't live long.
Yep, I find the OP a off-handed swipe at ASR and it's members, lacking in any real detail enough to debate on a point for point basis.
 
I would like to se a comprehensive measurement of a set of big magico . They seems to apply some sound design principles.
And do very expensive stuff, superficially it looks like they deliver. But we don’t know ? Do they share their klippel stuff ?

Wilson is just ridiculous , there is a measurement of one of their designs here at ASR the small tone tot , it’s basically broken.

What often happens in the very high end is the quality actually diminishes with price as the product is more like hand built Veblen goods . No real engineering at all just audio woo woo and person cult with guru designers :)

My favorite brand to bash is Audio Note ( the Great Britain variant ) everything they do is based on flaved principles and don’t understanding basic electrical engineering
Not sure if this counts:
 
Years ago, a violinist for a large orchestra complained that the recording sounded nothing like his violin. The recording engineer said, "Of course not. The audience is 30 feet away. The microphone is 30 feet away. You have no f*cking idea what your violin sounds like at a distance of 30 feet." End of complaints.

If that recording engineer thought the sound of the violin would be representative of how it sounds to the audience at 30 feet away, by placing the microphone at the same distance, I would also be questioning the result of that recording. A microphone doesn't work like our hearing, so placing the microphone at the same distance as the audience would most likely result in a way too high ratio of room reflections to the perceived direct sound of that violin. ;)
 
A very wealthy friend of me had top level Wilson Alexandria's (first gen), and did not like how they sounded. He asked me to advice them to something that would sound good, and i replaced his setup (Alexandria's with Pass Labs Xa amps) with a pair of JBL M2's powered by Hypex amps and 4 custom subs (18Sound 18" drivers in ported cabinets) amped with Powersoft modules. DSP is a Lake LMS and we took the time to tune it right and he could not be happier, even if his total setup only costed <50K in stead of 400K (speakers + amps). It also sounds a lot better. Since i did that in 2019, he is not interested anymore in "upgrading" his setup, and i did build a few others for other spaces in his "Chateau" with similar chosen gear for a lot cheaper than the shops suggested. This guy can buy any setup he wants, but has found his "end game" setup for less than 50K for amps, dsps and speakers.
 
When you realize that speakers like D&D, Grimm Audio, Kii and Sigberg audio, uses ready to buy off-the-shelf drives - maybe, just maybe - it's the craftsmanship and design, rather than esoteric driver material and story telling, which actually make people happy to listen to a given pair of speakers ;)
KEF are a bit different, since they aim to perfect the coax design, which I think most can agree is quite impressive in all price ranges.
 
I'm not much into hating anything myself. But if I were to replace that word with dislike my answer would twofold: namely that the vast majority of people looking to purchase a high performance loudspeaker and also have an objectivist mindset, do so from a certain value perspective.

Second, at a certain point the majority of boutique manufacturers seem to start to neglect the performance aspect in favor of simply being different. Not all of them, but certainly many of them. Take the latest Wilson flagship. While the fit and finish will without a doubt be on the highest level of craftmanship possible, it is a recipe for distaster in many other respects - but it does look unique, which probably appeals to a certain crowd of people. And Wilson is one of the lesser offenders. The truth is that good sound is more often than not brought to you by mainly similar looking (boring) loudspeakers - quite annoying if you need to differentiate yourself in a boutique market. So then you have to make up stories about other esoteric components, materials, construction, .. Some bring the whole package of odd shapes and bespoke components.
 
From my point a view, reviewing a speaker can hardly lead to a valid verdict if no listening to music was included.

Reviews of a car can’t come to a valid verdict if no one took a ride with it.
 
My favorite brand to bash is Audio Note ( the Great Britain variant ) everything they do is based on flaved principles and don’t understanding basic electrical engineering
But Børresen can be a contender in that case:;):)

I think the answer to TS's question: Why most users here HATE all very expensive speakers? lies in the fact that expensive speakers/models that measure poorly/sound poorly are addressed in threads where it is written page after page. They are seen as scam products and such things generate buzz.

Switch to good expensive speakers. The usual suspects, which are usually praised, have already been addressed in the thread I see; JBL,Revel, KEF, Neumann,Genelec and Dutch & Dutch and so on. There are threads about such good speakers but correct me if I'm wrong, I think those threads are not as well visited as those about expensive bad speakers? Hence TS's bias about all very expensive speakers?

Edit:
I can also mention some active ASR members who happen to be speaker designers who make good speakers that are not in the budget segment:




Lars Risbo from Purifi is active in that thread
 
Last edited:
Nothing exceeds the 'hate' for Bowers&Wilkins speakers here. IMO some of them sound quiet musical regardless of measurements.
Until 800D2 they were quite good, but D3 and specially D4 they lost it.

See below what they charge 12.5k usd for.

 
When you realize that speakers like D&D, Grimm Audio, Kii and Sigberg audio, uses ready to buy off-the-shelf drives - maybe, just maybe - it's the craftsmanship and design, rather than esoteric driver material and story telling, which actually make people happy to listen to a given pair of speakers ;)
Call it competent audio engineering - and then, essentially, I agree.
Sigberg doesn’t just use standard drivers, but also custom-made ones, such as the coaxial driver in the Saranna, for example.

P.S.
And just because drivers are commercially available for everyone doesn’t mean they’re bad. Purifi, Accuton, Scan-Speak, SB Audio, Seas, as well as manufacturers with roots in the professional sector—such as Sica, Faital, Beyma, RCF, 18SOUND, B&C, and BMS—produce absolutely top-notch products. Nevertheless, this doesn’t mean that mixing the best and most expensive drivers will necessarily result in an exceptionally good speaker; conversely, good but affordable drivers, when properly tuned, can lead to very good results.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom