- Joined
- Oct 11, 2018
- Messages
- 3,740
- Likes
- 6,454
I have no problems with 'luxury' goods. Sure, in many cases its a 'feeling' thing. Feelings are important. If a Chanel bag makes my wife happy, that's fine with me. She's important to me and we need more happiness around the house. But one has to understand limits. Rolex doesn't claim their watch will give time better time than Timex. You buy the former for fit and finish, and exclusivity.-- but the current crop of luxury goods are aimed at least an order of magnitude (and frequently two) higher than even boomers' aspirations. An "average" boomer might spring for a Corvette -- but not a Veyron.
That said, anyone who can afford a Bugatti knows that they have one of the fastest cars on the planet. That is not negotiable, or arguable. Not that they will ever use its capability. But it is there, if needed. In that specific case, you get what you pay for.
What is idiotic are those who say that an Accuphase (or whatever) 'sounds' better than a _____ (fill in the blank). I'm sure an Accuphase would make me feel all right. Why wouldn't it? Built to high standards by skilled craftsmen. Nice to look at, for sure. Pride of ownership and all that. But I'm not going to kid myself that it will sound better than what I already have. And I certainly wouldn't advise anyone that it is 'better' than something much cheaper, from a sonic standpoint.
One must mediate and balance these matters. But one mustn't ever let the heart overbalance the head, or the hands. Fritz didn't exactly have it right...