If I remove a cabinet that 100 hz peak is mostly removed but I still have to check if I can actually head it. I used the trimming of peaks up to about 900 hz.Dips are not really a big deal but in my experience but peaks are literal distortion.
If I remove a cabinet that 100 hz peak is mostly removed but I still have to check if I can actually head it. I used the trimming of peaks up to about 900 hz.
However, does DIRAC do this for me or is it less optimal?
And can you say anything about the 80 hz crossover?Dirac only adjusts (besides the phase correction) the average amplitude response of all your measurements to the target curve you provide.
However, I don’t think these measurements represent how people actually hear above 100Hz, Dirac does miracles when it comes to the subbass but response wise above 100Hz it does more harm than good with good speakers.
You need to surgically treat issues caused by the location of the speaker in the room, and leave the issues caused by the location of the listener alone.
And can you say anything about the 80 hz crossover?
Dirac only adjusts (besides the phase correction) the average amplitude response of all your measurements to the target curve you provide.
However, I don’t think these measurements represent how people actually hear above 100Hz, Dirac does miracles when it comes to the subbass but response wise above 100Hz it does more harm than good with good speakers.
You need to surgically treat issues caused by the location of the speaker in the room, and leave the issues caused by the location of the listener alone.
What do you base those claim of?
So it's your own experience with Dirac and not general.I remember it boosting an SBIR null and making it sound pretty awful, I learned a lot during the last year and a half.
Huge (-10 dB) dip between 200Hz and 300Hz in my room.
Hello, I have this huge 200Hz to 300Hz dip in my room and I don't really know why or what to do about it. The speakers are measured on this forum, they're flat so I would rule out the speakers. they're rear ported and placed in a bookcase; However, there is more than enough room for the...www.audiosciencereview.com
So it's your own experience with Dirac and not general.
No, not if I think so. It is, in fact, your own single experience you use as a generalization. -Isn't it?If you think so.
You're obviously not going to find an article from Dirac advising people not to use their products with good performing speakers.
Why would you not want to correct for room response and what are the negative effect you (and lots of sources on the internet) claim?You can find a lot of sources on the internet from people with much more higher qualifications than I am saying you should not EQ a speaker with a flat on-axis response and smooth directivity above the transition frequency. Something that DIRAC does.
You don't have to listen to me per say.
Dirac use a massive of 9 (as I remember) measurements, and if they are done correctly from many random spots in the listening area, a speaker with a flat on-axis response and smooth directivity would measure flat (with some HF decline, but Dirac also has decline in target curve).You can find a lot of sources on the internet from people with much more higher qualifications than I am saying you should not EQ a speaker with a flat on-axis response and smooth directivity above the transition frequency. Something that DIRAC does.