• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Why Cables CAN Sound Different: NOW with Proof?

Status
Not open for further replies.

joeg26er

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2025
Messages
22
Likes
4
Thoughts? Grain of salt the Juhl guy works for an "audiophile" cable company
My thoughts are keep an open mind and that cables CAN "COLOR" sound by being "poorly" designed or intentionally designed badly LOL

This video is interesting as it shows actual measurement and testing of lots of cables and differences -

From the article-

What Standard Tests Miss

Most cable tests focus on frequency response and distortion. And, across many cables, those graphs look almost the same.

However, according to Joakim Juhl from OePhi Cables, they don’t tell us how a cable handles time (i.e. when sounds start, stop, and line up with each other).

So what does “time-domain performance” actually mean in practice? It’s about how a cable behaves with fast changes and real music, including:

  • How quickly signals rise and settle after a transition,
  • How much energy the cable stores and then releases a moment later,
  • Whether there’s ringing or smear after sharp edges,
  • How consistent the propagation delay is (tiny variations add up),
  • Whether timing stays stable at different signal levels,
  • And how well impedance stays consistent along the path.
Music isn’t steady-state as kicks, snares, consonants, and note attacks are short, sharp events. So, if a cable stores and releases energy or shifts delay by a hair, those events won’t land together.

Two cables can look equal on FR/THD but handle those fast edges very differently.

“We know that frequency response and total harmonic distortion measurements are not really that different between cables,” Juhl explained in a recent interview.

“We might see small things, but I think it’s a far stretch to say that’s the reason we hear subjectively big differences.”
Comparison tests also report the same pattern.

In Alpha Audio’s test, for instance, there are minimal differences in FR/THD, but clear spreads in time-domain behavior, including stability that can shift with signal level and load. In short, the usual plots don’t flag the differences that matter in sound quality.

This is the guy-

Joakim Juhl is an assistant professor at Aalborg University in Copenhagen, Denmark and a Research Associate with the Program on Science, Technology and Society. He was a Postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard STS Program in 2013-2017. His research focuses on the normative foundations of technological innovation and its relation to social expectations of science. Joakim contributes to the National Science Foundation funded project, “Traveling Imaginaries of Innovation: The Practice Turn and Its Transnational Implementation”. The project examines the ways in which innovation models are identified and reproduced in different regional settings. As part of his work for the project, Joakim investigates Copenhagen-Malmö and Cambridge, UK.
 
The dude is a social scientist, not a physical scientist or engineer. He is showing utterly well-known effects that come at ultra-high frequencies. He talks about nanosecond time differences; that corresponds to GHz frequencies (billions of Hertz, compared to the thousands of Hertz for audio). Completely irrelevant for audio.
 
Which he won't do, or will do badly, allowing some completely different effect (eg a loudness difference) to invalidate it.

Nobody's hearing extends to a half cycle signal at 1,000,000,000 Hz. If we can't treat that as an established fact, then we should also be checking whether or not the earth is still round.
 
This is a revelation, I'm making new cables right now. Cooling takes a while, though... :)

Steel.JPG
 
Too many cable threads and this one already has a troubled start. Locked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom