• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Why aren't we bringing the equipment prices down with more published blind test demos?

Imagine the impact of multiple blind-tests using a 300-500$ bookshelf speakers and some EQ to match the sound of the Dynaudio and not being able to distinguish them or getting a difference that doesn't justify the extra money.
There are dozens of good speakers under $500 for those willing to do even a couple minutes of research, why would you care about the ones that cost $13K, and why do you care how other people spend their money?

Blind tests have never had the effect you're thinking they will, either.
 
Last edited:
It is agreed by myself to what you wrote. I am aware for instance that hi-hyped Nike shoes are cheap in production. It is the influence of heavy advertising. This also true for some other goods made cheap in far east and sold high priced in Europe. You are right, the initial topic went off the track.
By the way, what is your company producing?
In the food industry, by the way, the situation is even worse.

We manufacture high-energy products and technical glass products for industry. Among other things, we also manufacture them for material testing, material stress, aging and durability tests, but also for pre-aging components and assemblies (keyword: burning in).
In the past, in the 60s/70s, we also produced and repaired electron tubes for TV and radio stations, and some for the audio sector, but that was a long time ago.
 
In the food industry, by the way, the situation is even worse.

We manufacture high-energy products and technical glass products for industry. Among other things, we also manufacture them for material testing, material stress, aging and durability tests, but also for pre-aging components and assemblies (keyword: burning in).
In the past, in the 60s/70s, we also produced and repaired electron tubes for TV and radio stations, and some for the audio sector, but that was a long time ago.
Danke for the information.
 
Many years ago, I lusted after a pair of Dynaudio 1.3SEs. The -SE variant commanded a significant premium in part, because of it's gorgeous, flame-patterned maple veneer: Top-notch woods command a premium, because they are scarce.

But genuine scarcity aside, the stuff in our lives can also have meanings which go far beyond their utilitarian functions: They might be seen as embodiments of success, glamor or power.

For workers, pursuit of "next-level" stuff can be incentive to work a little longer and harder. And western market economies have done an amazing job at ensuring that there is always a "next level" no matter one's income level.

As for why most folks do not break out of this cycle, a few do. But I think most really want to want something. And world leaders want to maintain that status quo in the name of never-ending growth, even in the face of declining populations.
 
Many years ago, I lusted after a pair of Dynaudio 1.3SEs. The -SE variant commanded a significant premium in part, because of it's gorgeous, flame-patterned maple veneer: Top-notch woods command a premium, because they are scarce.

But genuine scarcity aside, the stuff in our lives can also have meanings which go far beyond their utilitarian functions: They might be seen as embodiments of success, glamor or power.

For workers, pursuit of "next-level" stuff can be incentive to work a little longer and harder. And western market economies have done an amazing job at ensuring that there is always a "next level" no matter one's income level.

As for why most folks do not break out of this cycle, a few do. But I think most really want to want something. And world leaders want to maintain that status quo in the name of never-ending growth, even in the face of declining populations.
Well said. At the end of the day, the low end of the market is about as cheap as it can be with the manufacturers staying in business. (say $1000 or less) The pricing at the high end of the market has little or nothing to do with raw performance (i.e. blind tests). ($10,000+) The middle of the market depends on willingness to pay extra for incremental performance, build quality, industrial design, or brand, and pricing is not really linear here. And so the pricing status quo remains as it is.
 
Funny how one uses paper cones and the other uses "Diamond Beryllium tweeters, Carbon Fiber, Nano-tech etc. both cost the same. I'm gonna go on a limb here and say material by itself is not that important.
Blasphemy, you're completely disregarding their outrageously expensive research and development...
 
My observation is that prices are going down taking inflation into consideration. This is most certainly true of DACs and headphone amps. Also, to a lesser extent, of amplifiers. There are plenty of first-rate powered speakers. They may appear to be more expensive, but as they include amplification, the price overall is lower.
 
My observation is that prices are going down taking inflation into consideration. This is most certainly true of DACs and headphone amps. Also, to a lesser extent, of amplifiers. There are plenty of first-rate powered speakers. They may appear to be more expensive, but as they include amplification, the price overall is lower.
Also profit margins, even after they recoup costs, companies want continue increasing the "margins".
 
You can see the Sound United performance in the Masimo financial reports. Whatever margins they are charging, it is not profitable.

Yeah, some companies do have it ruff, especially with high interest loans, and generally this hobby's market does not grow much.
 
And to the "audiophile crowd" a higher price often makes the item more desirable.

My marketing professor used to say, "When in doubt, raise the price."

One of the reasons I buy "economically", is that often even expensive electronics isn't worth repairing when it fails. With cheap stuff you just throw it out and replace it, and usually you don't feel so bad.
personally I recommend using a cup and strip for listening..I hear it measures well according to the harmen curve
 
A few points on this, the last one is the most important...

1. We are manufacturers ourselves in Germany and in the last 5 years our production costs, excluding employees, have increased by at least 30-50%, in some cases even by 80%. The purchase prices for finished products that we buy have even tripled.
And this is the case in almost all areas worldwide.

2. Don't take the following personally, this actually applies to most end users.
You have no idea how sales prices are made up and how they are calculated by the manufacturer. Are you aware that the manufacturer only gets a maximum of 25-40% of its products that are sold through retailers (including online and Amazon)?

3. Are you also aware that with the purchase price you are not only paying for the device, components and manufacturing costs, but also development costs, measuring device costs, building costs, sales costs, employees, etc. The development costs in particular are in the 5-6 digit range and must also be covered by the 25-40%.
Or are you not paid for your work? I am still looking for employees who will work for free.

4. Every manufacturer has the right to price their devices, speakers, etc. as they see fit, and that is none of the buyer's business.
The buyer has the right to decide for themselves whether the product is worth the price. If not, buy something else, nobody is forcing you to do anything.
And there are not only measured values or ratings after blind tests, but much more, such as materials, value, surface quality, component quality, reputation, status symbol, quality, durability, repairability (even after years or decades), service, maintenance and expansion of firmware, etc.
All costs must also always be divided by the number of units, which makes small quantities and niche products very expensive.
All things that you can pay for, or not.

5. These blind tests were already carried out 20-30 years ago, and they achieved nothing except that even more expensive products were sold. In the 90s and early 2000s there were countless listening sessions and blind tests by retailers and manufacturers. I once went to 6 of these events within a month and it took place at least 10 times throughout the day. Always with 15-30 people.
Real and usable blind tests are much more difficult, complex and costly than you imagine. Especially if you want to be as unassailable as possible.
And the results will often not be what you want.

6. But the most important point is that such low prices, or prices that are too low, lead to the problems that we now have with many manufacturers. And buyers who buy at such low prices don't need to complain about it.
Unfinished devices, hardware and firmware, no detailed tests, no long-term tests, only optimized on the AP to shine with good measured values. The result is always shown in failed devices, firmware problems, hardware problems, strange behavior, unfinished devices, etc.
But most of these cheap developments were also created on the fly (1-2 months after the release of new DAC chips, the first top devices are available), far from being mature, far from being fully developed.
Tests? Long-term tests? Quality controls? But you don't want to pay for that.
Oh yes, and a large proportion of the devices come from the standard layouts and white papers of the chip manufacturers with little development effort. No real innovations, no real or individual developments, only standard designs optimized on the AP for measured values.

With customers like these, it doesn't surprise me at all that many good manufacturers are pulling out or moving their products into a more expensive luxury segment, like Linn, for example.
Because when one of these cheap manufacturers released one of the best DACs tested here in the forum for €/$900 around 3 years ago, with many of its own developments and certainly high development costs, the manufacturer was attacked for the price.
It seems that most buyers work voluntarily and don't want to be paid for their work. Please contact me, we have enough work.
Another expense (I hope that I did not miss it skimming through): Licensing fees for various protocols for decoding or whatever...
 
Dynaudio is an example of a good brand which sells for premium prices, and I'd regard those speakers as a luxury product. You might be able to achieve similar levels of performance for less money, but in the world of luxury goods, that's beside the point.
I don't think speakers can be considered luxury brands.

Dynaudio speakers are definitely pricey, but they also come with advanced technology. In China, you can get locally made Dynaudio speakers at a reasonable price. Some imported French brands are even more expensive than Dynaudio speakers.

Luxury brands are mostly in the fashion industry. A simple piece of cotton with a logo on it can be sold at a high price, sometimes even more expensive than a set of Dynaudio speakers,sometimes even limited edition, and wealthy people may not even be able to buy them!

It's undeniable that Dynaudio speakers have top-notch products, which are worth a lot of money. But this is also a display of brand value and R&D strength. But this is definitely not a luxury product.
 
I don't think speakers can be considered luxury brands.

Dynaudio speakers are definitely pricey, but they also come with advanced technology. In China, you can get locally made Dynaudio speakers at a reasonable price. Some imported French brands are even more expensive than Dynaudio speakers.

Luxury brands are mostly in the fashion industry. A simple piece of cotton with a logo on it can be sold at a high price, sometimes even more expensive than a set of Dynaudio speakers,sometimes even limited edition, and wealthy people may not even be able to buy them!

It's undeniable that Dynaudio speakers have top-notch products, which are worth a lot of money. But this is also a display of brand value and R&D strength. But this is definitely not a luxury product.
How about considering them a "Life Style" product, then?
 
I once worked at a biotech and the president sold his house with his listening room included and the stereo system more than doubled the price of the house. that day he had just spent $1000 on a sealed first pressing of a muddy waters record. i am sure he had a very good sounding system but i genuinely question the validity of a $300k stereo. of course, at that level people spend that kind of dough because they can and because it's fun to feel like you have the best of the best. i remember i was jealous because he had a separate room just for listening-- that seemed incredibly extravagant to me at the time, as i was earning $14/hour.
 
I don't think speakers can be considered luxury brands.

Dynaudio speakers are definitely pricey, but they also come with advanced technology. In China, you can get locally made Dynaudio speakers at a reasonable price. Some imported French brands are even more expensive than Dynaudio speakers.

Luxury brands are mostly in the fashion industry. A simple piece of cotton with a logo on it can be sold at a high price, sometimes even more expensive than a set of Dynaudio speakers,sometimes even limited edition, and wealthy people may not even be able to buy them!

It's undeniable that Dynaudio speakers have top-notch products, which are worth a lot of money. But this is also a display of brand value and R&D strength. But this is definitely not a luxury product.
Funny thing is that Dynaudio also had a bunch of poorly designed products, not too long ago. People that checked the products were almost laughing at the mistakes.
Like Dynaudio, there are others also with poor designs, at least in the past, Wilson Audio for example.
 
i genuinely question the validity of a $300k stereo. of course, at that level people spend that kind of dough because they can and because it's fun to feel like you have the best of the best.

According to copilot, the states with a Ferrari dealership are:

- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Louisiana
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Nevada
- New Jersey
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- South Carolina
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia
- Washington
- Wisconsin

If you live in one of those states, presumably you have seen a few Ferrari’s. Living in California, in my entire lifetime, I have seen one Bugatti Veyron and one Bugatti Chiron and certainly plenty of Ferrari’s and Lamborghini’s.

Unlike those super cars which are sold at MSRP or higher, the high end audio gear at silly prices probably has some wiggle room.

The other way to look at it is to go downmarket from the Ferrari and look at Corvette’s. That’s a “midlife crisis” / “retirement reward” for many. The entry level Corvette which is amazing, but also common enough to be seen without drawing too much attention starts at $70k. So you can easily imagine someone rewarding themselves with a $70K audio system even if it a purchase of the heart and not the brain. Heck, Steinway’s Spirio R pianos are $125K or so and they seem to have no problem staying in business and while people can collect cars, I don’t know anyone who collects pianos.

The goal of ASR is to help those buyer’s maximize their $70K budget. You get to spend a lot of exotic finishes and design, but here, you’ll learn about room nodes, need for DSP and value of speakers over electronics. $70k and an ASR approved setup could be something as silly as a Genelec 8381A with a WiiM Pro.
 
Back
Top Bottom