• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Why aren't we bringing the equipment prices down with more published blind test demos?

A few points on this, the last one is the most important...

1. We are manufacturers ourselves in Germany and in the last 5 years our production costs, excluding employees, have increased by at least 30-50%, in some cases even by 80%. The purchase prices for finished products that we buy have even tripled.
And this is the case in almost all areas worldwide.

2. Don't take the following personally, this actually applies to most end users.
You have no idea how sales prices are made up and how they are calculated by the manufacturer. Are you aware that the manufacturer only gets a maximum of 25-40% of its products that are sold through retailers (including online and Amazon)?

3. Are you also aware that with the purchase price you are not only paying for the device, components and manufacturing costs, but also development costs, measuring device costs, building costs, sales costs, employees, etc. The development costs in particular are in the 5-6 digit range and must also be covered by the 25-40%.
Or are you not paid for your work? I am still looking for employees who will work for free.

4. Every manufacturer has the right to price their devices, speakers, etc. as they see fit, and that is none of the buyer's business.
The buyer has the right to decide for themselves whether the product is worth the price. If not, buy something else, nobody is forcing you to do anything.
And there are not only measured values or ratings after blind tests, but much more, such as materials, value, surface quality, component quality, reputation, status symbol, quality, durability, repairability (even after years or decades), service, maintenance and expansion of firmware, etc.
All costs must also always be divided by the number of units, which makes small quantities and niche products very expensive.
All things that you can pay for, or not.

5. These blind tests were already carried out 20-30 years ago, and they achieved nothing except that even more expensive products were sold. In the 90s and early 2000s there were countless listening sessions and blind tests by retailers and manufacturers. I once went to 6 of these events within a month and it took place at least 10 times throughout the day. Always with 15-30 people.
Real and usable blind tests are much more difficult, complex and costly than you imagine. Especially if you want to be as unassailable as possible.
And the results will often not be what you want.

6. But the most important point is that such low prices, or prices that are too low, lead to the problems that we now have with many manufacturers. And buyers who buy at such low prices don't need to complain about it.
Unfinished devices, hardware and firmware, no detailed tests, no long-term tests, only optimized on the AP to shine with good measured values. The result is always shown in failed devices, firmware problems, hardware problems, strange behavior, unfinished devices, etc.
But most of these cheap developments were also created on the fly (1-2 months after the release of new DAC chips, the first top devices are available), far from being mature, far from being fully developed.
Tests? Long-term tests? Quality controls? But you don't want to pay for that.
Oh yes, and a large proportion of the devices come from the standard layouts and white papers of the chip manufacturers with little development effort. No real innovations, no real or individual developments, only standard designs optimized on the AP for measured values.

With customers like these, it doesn't surprise me at all that many good manufacturers are pulling out or moving their products into a more expensive luxury segment, like Linn, for example.
Because when one of these cheap manufacturers released one of the best DACs tested here in the forum for €/$900 around 3 years ago, with many of its own developments and certainly high development costs, the manufacturer was attacked for the price.
It seems that most buyers work voluntarily and don't want to be paid for their work. Please contact me, we have enough work.
Are you from Dynaudio, selling 13k$ bookshelf speakers?
Do they show any clear audible/measurable results of their "research" and "development"?
I mean just something there, to convince you why it should cost that much and not less than half(if there were no new "developments" and used instead the "developments" from the previous generation to keep the costs down[ resulting 0 costs for current generation "developments"])?
I'd be so ashamed to discover some crappy 500$ bookshelves keeping up with these Confidence C20's...
 
You can get better measuring equipment but not cheaper equipment. The industry isn’t rolling in profits. A good set of bookshelf speakers cost $1k - 2k because that is what the drivers, crossovers, cabinets, veneers, labor, shipping, retail markup and customer service costs demand.

At a certain level, the expectation is that audio devices also be furniture because they are going in the home of established professionals. My F206 are not out of place finish wise or price wise relative to my hardwood furniture pieces. I would be willing to pay more for my MiniDSP 2x4 HD and Fosi v3 to have better finishes. Younger people would want it cheaper but they probably aren’t the biggest buying group for this cost of speaker.
 
You can get better measuring equipment but not cheaper equipment. The industry isn’t rolling in profits. A good set of bookshelf speakers cost $1k - 2k because that is what the drivers, crossovers, cabinets, veneers, labor, shipping, retail markup and customer service costs demand.

At a certain level, the expectation is that audio devices also be furniture because they are going in the home of established professionals. My F206 are not out of place finish wise or price wise relative to my hardwood furniture pieces. I would be willing to pay more for my MiniDSP 2x4 HD and Fosi v3 to have better finishes. Younger people would want it cheaper but they probably aren’t the biggest buying group for this cost of speaker.
I could point out that upper mid level furniture pieces sell for thousands. People buy furniture for all kinds of reasons, but expensive stuff is not usually more functional.
 
In wandering in the realm of hifi over the decades, I've come to these generalizations: Get a good enough turntable, and put a superior cart and needle in it. Get separate pre-pro and amps, with balanced interconnects instead of RCA if possible, but don't worry much about wire quality -- and class D amps are better than class B at lower price points. So skimping on turntable, wire and amp prices isn't much of a compromise. But as for speakers, the better ones are truly better, and cheap won't get you there. I've run Cambridge, which were inferior to Klipsch, which were inferior to Fluance, which were inferior to Polk, which were inferior to Emotiva, which were inferior to RSL -- are of which were far less capable, especially in reproducing musical harmonics and detail, than the Revels I've most recently moved up to. This isn't something to fix with an equalizer or room correction. If your speakers won't go there, you can't correct what they can't produce. To be fair I wasn't running the flagship models of any of these brands.

As for what I A/B them against, it's my collection of guitars. I can hear whether string harmonics are coming through, as that's the aspect of guitars I find most fascinating. (I'm sure there are many here with better opinions on aspects of this. Just keeping the discussion flowing.... You might even change my mind on some of this.)
 
In wandering in the realm of hifi over the decades, I've come to these generalizations: Get a good enough turntable, and put a superior cart and needle in it. Get separate pre-pro and amps, with balanced interconnects instead of RCA if possible, but don't worry much about wire quality -- and class D amps are better than class B at lower price points. So skimping on turntable, wire and amp prices isn't much of a compromise. But as for speakers, the better ones are truly better, and cheap won't get you there. I've run Cambridge, which were inferior to Klipsch, which were inferior to Fluance, which were inferior to Polk, which were inferior to Emotiva, which were inferior to RSL -- are of which were far less capable, especially in reproducing musical harmonics and detail, than the Revels I've most recently moved up to. This isn't something to fix with an equalizer or room correction. If your speakers won't go there, you can't correct what they can't produce. To be fair I wasn't running the flagship models of any of these brands.

As for what I A/B them against, it's my collection of guitars. I can hear whether string harmonics are coming through, as that's the aspect of guitars I find most fascinating. (I'm sure there are many here with better opinions on aspects of this. Just keeping the discussion flowing.... You might even change my mind on some of this.)
I’m not ready to believe that $13,000 speakers are ten times better than well designed $1300 speakers.

More to the point, I think taste and room effects can be more important than Quality, assuming basic competence.
 
I’m not ready to believe that $13,000 speakers are ten times better than well designed $1300 speakers.

More to the point, I think taste and room effects can be more important than Quality, assuming basic competence.
I've heard lots of speakers that meet and exceed that value you mentioned. I can detect a difference in the better speakers and I'm sure in the right environment that you would too. Then like take a JBL tower speaker and compare it to a KEF and you'll hear very different interpretations of what they think is best so it gets difficult to chose because they both are really good if listened to for a half hour+.
 
Last edited:
I've heard lots of speakers that meet and exceed that value you mentioned. I can detect a difference in the better speakers and I'm sure in the right environment that you would too. Then like take a JBL tower speaker and compare it to a KEF and you'll hear very different interpretations of what they think its best so it gets difficult to chose because they both are really good if listened to for a half hour+.
I think about new speakers in terms of months. Hearing differences is easy. The problem is that if you enjoy music, you can learn to listen through the equipment. All I require is bass that goes down to 40 Hz without thumping or sounding like a didgeridoo at resonance, and reasonably flat response in the midrange and lower treble. I don’t play loud, so lots of speakers qualify. If I stop worrying about them after a few months, they’re keepers. I have two keepers and some 901s that my wife likes.
 
All I require is bass that goes down to 40 Hz without thumping or sounding like a didgeridoo at resonance
Haha... LoL. :D
Yeah, I am pretty easy to please as long as I have PEQ and a clean source.
 
I could point out that upper mid level furniture pieces sell for thousands. People buy furniture for all kinds of reasons, but expensive stuff is not usually more functional.
Yes, the best time to lobby to buy new speakers is right after you got the matching walnut living room set at Crate & Barrel. They make Revel prices seem reasonable.
 
Not at all, speakers require proper engineering if they are going to be any good, and that's not cheap.

A $13K retail price speaker is made up of maybe $1.3K of components. It's not going to be the best speaker possible by a long margin.

Maybe at $130K you are moving into Veblen goods with loudspeakers. Maybe.
Lets agree to disagree.

I think we have enough objective evidence now to definitively say that "objectively great performance" in a speaker does not require a five digit price.
 
The existence of tests is not the only variable that impacts price. Even if there is a clear ‘winner’ component on price & performance, would all audiophiles all line up and agree on anything? More relevant: labor, country where the labor happens, materials, R&D, advertising, worker health care, and exclusivity.

Truth is: If your operation is located in China, the USA or Europe and you’re not running a sweatshop, you are locked into a price-floor, below which you cannot drop, without outsourcing, no matter how good the competition may be. There are many manufacturers in this group and I can only imagine how their blood boils when the read accusations of ‘snake oil’ or ripoff when those many variables are overlooked.

Personally, I’m happy there is variety in the marketplace. I like that there are things made in the US, where I live. Call it ‘exclusivity’ if it makes you feel better.
 
The simple answer is that's not how things work. Loudspeakers with "managed" frequency response continue to sell well because they sound good in the showroom.
 
The simple answer is that's not how things work. Loudspeakers with "managed" frequency response continue to sell well because they sound good in the showroom.
When representing speaker lines I never used the tone control or EQ until after the customers selected their speakers and then I would ask if they would like to hear them boosted and then I show them what a little spice can do. It's a happy thing to do before hitting the computer to write up the deal and go through the cashier.
 
Are you from Dynaudio, selling 13k$ bookshelf speakers?
Do they show any clear audible/measurable results of their "research" and "development"?
I mean just something there, to convince you why it should cost that much and not less than half(if there were no new "developments" and used instead the "developments" from the previous generation to keep the costs down[ resulting 0 costs for current generation "developments"])?
I'd be so ashamed to discover some crappy 500$ bookshelves keeping up with these Confidence C20's...
No, I have DIY speakers for around €4000 per pair, but these speakers would be even more expensive in the store than the Confidence 20.

But I know the Dynaudio Confidence 20 very well, as well as the Confidence 50.
And you have already heard the Confidence 20? And compared it with your crappy $500 bookshelves?
Then you can tell us for sure which crappy $500 bookshelves they are that, in your personal experience, can keep up with the Dynaudio Confidence 20, right?

This post just shows that you really have no idea about development, the effort involved and the costs.
You can't buy any part of the Dynaudio Confidence series anywhere, every part was developed by Dynaudio and Dynaudio would be absolutely stupid if they published any results of their development and research.
 
A few points on this, the last one is the most important...

1. We are manufacturers ourselves in Germany and in the last 5 years our production costs, excluding employees, have increased by at least 30-50%, in some cases even by 80%. The purchase prices for finished products that we buy have even tripled.
And this is the case in almost all areas worldwide.

2. Don't take the following personally, this actually applies to most end users.
You have no idea how sales prices are made up and how they are calculated by the manufacturer. Are you aware that the manufacturer only gets a maximum of 25-40% of its products that are sold through retailers (including online and Amazon)?

3. Are you also aware that with the purchase price you are not only paying for the device, components and manufacturing costs, but also development costs, measuring device costs, building costs, sales costs, employees, etc. The development costs in particular are in the 5-6 digit range and must also be covered by the 25-40%.
Or are you not paid for your work? I am still looking for employees who will work for free.

4. Every manufacturer has the right to price their devices, speakers, etc. as they see fit, and that is none of the buyer's business.
The buyer has the right to decide for themselves whether the product is worth the price. If not, buy something else, nobody is forcing you to do anything.
And there are not only measured values or ratings after blind tests, but much more, such as materials, value, surface quality, component quality, reputation, status symbol, quality, durability, repairability (even after years or decades), service, maintenance and expansion of firmware, etc.
All costs must also always be divided by the number of units, which makes small quantities and niche products very expensive.
All things that you can pay for, or not.

5. These blind tests were already carried out 20-30 years ago, and they achieved nothing except that even more expensive products were sold. In the 90s and early 2000s there were countless listening sessions and blind tests by retailers and manufacturers. I once went to 6 of these events within a month and it took place at least 10 times throughout the day. Always with 15-30 people.
Real and usable blind tests are much more difficult, complex and costly than you imagine. Especially if you want to be as unassailable as possible.
And the results will often not be what you want.

6. But the most important point is that such low prices, or prices that are too low, lead to the problems that we now have with many manufacturers. And buyers who buy at such low prices don't need to complain about it.
Unfinished devices, hardware and firmware, no detailed tests, no long-term tests, only optimized on the AP to shine with good measured values. The result is always shown in failed devices, firmware problems, hardware problems, strange behavior, unfinished devices, etc.
But most of these cheap developments were also created on the fly (1-2 months after the release of new DAC chips, the first top devices are available), far from being mature, far from being fully developed.
Tests? Long-term tests? Quality controls? But you don't want to pay for that.
Oh yes, and a large proportion of the devices come from the standard layouts and white papers of the chip manufacturers with little development effort. No real innovations, no real or individual developments, only standard designs optimized on the AP for measured values.

With customers like these, it doesn't surprise me at all that many good manufacturers are pulling out or moving their products into a more expensive luxury segment, like Linn, for example.
Because when one of these cheap manufacturers released one of the best DACs tested here in the forum for €/$900 around 3 years ago, with many of its own developments and certainly high development costs, the manufacturer was attacked for the price.
It seems that most buyers work voluntarily and don't want to be paid for their work. Please contact me, we have enough work.
Translating this results in "ABANDON SHIP! ABANDON SHIP!! ALL HANDS ABANDON SHIP!!!
Consumers have had their credit limits jacked up way above what they are able to pay back. Bloated prices for a box, cheap wires, capacitors, resistors and and half shoddy connections have no right to sell for anything over $250 US. Blue meters, phony veneer, cheap parts = really stupid consumer using credit - spending money they aint got in the first place.
This audio industry, like 95% of today's corporations, are nose diving into bankruptcy and I am going to enjoy every minute of it. Greed Strategy fails, and those of you involved are the lucky winners of a lost civilization.
(Oh, it doesn't take months to figure out how to put a speaker together, it's been done for over a century now.)
 
I’m not ready to believe that $13,000 speakers are ten times better than well designed $1300 speakers.
"Ten times better" is a subjective judgment - for some people they are 100 times better, another person may find them 25% better at best.

Translating this results in "ABANDON SHIP! ABANDON SHIP!! ALL HANDS ABANDON SHIP!!!
Consumers have had their credit limits jacked up way above what they are able to pay back. Bloated prices for a box, cheap wires, capacitors, resistors and and half shoddy connections have no right to sell for anything over $250 US. Blue meters, phony veneer, cheap parts = really stupid consumer using credit - spending money they aint got in the first place.
This audio industry, like 95% of today's corporations, are nose diving into bankruptcy and I am going to enjoy every minute of it. Greed Strategy fails, and those of you involved are the lucky winners of a lost civilization.
(Oh, it doesn't take months to figure out how to put a speaker together, it's been done for over a century now.)
Frankly this statement is as uncritically misanthropic as it is ignorant...
 
I’m not ready to believe that $13,000 speakers are ten times better than well designed $1300 speakers.

I owned the Confidence 20's. They are not 10 times better than any decent speaker...just pretty and good for bragging rights.

20210305_180747.jpg
 
Last edited:
Lets agree to disagree.

I think we have enough objective evidence now to definitively say that "objectively great performance" in a speaker does not require a five digit price.
I agree you can get 'objectively great performance' for under $10K, but that doesn't mean you can't possibly get any better than that.
 
No, I have DIY speakers for around €4000 per pair, but these speakers would be even more expensive in the store than the Confidence 20.

But I know the Dynaudio Confidence 20 very well, as well as the Confidence 50.
And you have already heard the Confidence 20? And compared it with your crappy $500 bookshelves?
Then you can tell us for sure which crappy $500 bookshelves they are that, in your personal experience, can keep up with the Dynaudio Confidence 20, right?

This post just shows that you really have no idea about development, the effort involved and the costs.
You can't buy any part of the Dynaudio Confidence series anywhere, every part was developed by Dynaudio and Dynaudio would be absolutely stupid if they published any results of their development and research.
Would be interesting to know how the Dynaudio price is assembled by development, production, marketing and distribution cost including the margin for the retailer. Compared the price Dynaudio with the well known and long time established brand T+A in Germany. There you get for less money speakers with more than two chassis and speakers which for sure can play deep bass louder than the Confidence 20. Dynaudio claimes that their small speaker is able to be as good as big speakers. I don't believe this. Sounds to me like on audio shows small speakers were presented with music which has almost no bass content like vocal with acoustic guitar but enriched with high pitched drums. So, what does T+A do different to Dynaudio?
 
Back
Top Bottom