One of the more challenging aspects of moderating ASR is finding the right balance between differing perspectives.
Most notably with threads where a member disagrees strongly with science or taking a more objective approach. In some cases, a thread may be closed or posts removed. However, some of these threads are kept around as potential examples of open debate to compare and contrast opposing views in audio.
Even a thread (such as this one) where we discuss differing perspectives over how ASR is managed/moderated, can benefit from wider exposure. While I have emphasized the benefit of privacy, it should be balanced by some level of public discussion as well. If I close this thread, it should be because it served its purpose or is no longer able to do so. Hopefully I strike a good balance most of the time. Most members will never know the full set of reasons that Amir or I have for any given action. It may not appear to be an optimal decision for a given member, but hopefully it is for most ASR members.