It's just the way the brain works - it can fool us into percieving a difference when there isn't one, or failing to spot a real difference because you're not expecting one for that matter. It's well known and demonstrated in other fields, not just audio, and it's why any testing where you want to know if there's actually a detectable difference has to control for other factors that might influence the result. A non-audio example is food tasting happening under blue lighting to avoid the food colour influencing the perception of flavour. In audio, testing has shown that a small difference in signal level between 2 signals leads to both being apparently as loud as each other, but the one with the greater level usually being preferred. This is why we insist on level matching. Similarly blind testing removes the bias you may have, consciously or unconsciously. Fast switching is needed to get past auditory memory being short. Then there's statistics - occasionally you can throw 10 heads in a row, so passing an ABX once may not be convincing, but getting somewhere around 70% right every time you do it will show there's a difference but that it's not always detectable.
One problem with this is that until you try a properly controlled test you won't see the need for one - after all you clearly heard a difference! You may fortuitously spot the problem - many builders, both DIY and professional, have described the experience of having clearly heard the difference from a change, then discovering that they hadn't actually changed anything.
Another problem is that a properly controlled test takes quite a bit more effort and expense, and may be simply impractical. An ABX box for testing cables, DACs, headphone amps and the like may be relatively easy, but power amp switching is a bit harder, and there aren't many off the shelf examples so you'll probably have to build it. A robotic speaker switcher is beyond almost all of us. It's also not a lot of fun!
I'm not saying that there's never an audible difference between opamps or cables, but usually when there is an audible difference it's because there's a measurable defect with one of them. It's even possible you'll prefer the sound of the defect. Spending an afternoon doing uncontrolled tests is mostly harmless entertainment, so long as it doesn't become an expensive habit, but you should be aware of the limitations. If you start telling others that there's a clear difference you should at least tell them whether it was in a controlled test or not.
I have 3 TPA3255 AIYIMA A07 amplifiers and all 3 with the standard OPAs all sound the same, if you change the OPAs the sound changes, sorry but I'm Italian and I translate the language with the translator, I hope I have explained myself well.
I have only 1 TPA3255 AIYIMA A07 and I can hear the sound changes too but we should say that just "our subjective" LOL.
OH I saw your TOPPING P50 LPS pic , Is it worth the price?
I didn't understand what you meanDon't mind me. Don't mind me that just subjective and I want to ask robertospeed about TOPPING P50 LPS.
I didn't understand what you mean
As I think, the topping D50 and topping E30 don't need a linear power supply like the topping P50, they sound good even with a simple smartphone battery charger.In this post
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...amp-do-you-recommend.9148/page-12#post-526970
I saw your TOPPING P50 LPS pic , Is it worth the price? Did you compare P50 with some mobile adapter?
I just ordered E30 then if it's good , I will copy you lol.
As I think, the topping D50 and topping E30 don't need a linear power supply like the topping P50, they sound good even with a simple smartphone battery charger.
I bought several TPA3116D2 amplifiers, but none of them exceeded the sound quality of AIYIMA A07.https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-amp-do-you-recommend.9148/page-6#post-445952
It's really? Horrible measurement report.
A07 had didn't output of over 20kHz?
Now I have TPA3116, but if that measurement is correct, I'll be there no reason buy TPA3255...
I bought several TPA3116D2 amplifiers, but none of them exceeded the sound quality of AIYIMA A07.
These amps are cheap, so please buy them yourself and compare them.
I bought several TPA3116D2 amplifiers, but none of them exceeded the sound quality of AIYIMA A07.
These amps are cheap, so please buy them yourself and compare them.
Does any audio file have a band greater than 20 kHz?and I'm using DAC that has frequency response 10Hz-80kHz.
The distortion plot stops just over 10kHz so there's a good chance the test was done with a 44.1kHz sample rate, and the sharp drop in frequency response is the antialias filter. Perhaps @scherbakov_al still has the details and can confirm.https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-amp-do-you-recommend.9148/page-6#post-445952
It's really? Horrible measurement report.
A07 had didn't output of over 20kHz?
Now I have TPA3116, but if that measurement is correct, I'll be there no reason buy TPA3255...
Does any audio file have a band greater than 20 kHz?
The distortion plot stops just over 10kHz so there's a good chance the test was done with a 44.1kHz sample rate, and the sharp drop in frequency response is the antialias filter. Perhaps @scherbakov_al still has the details and can confirm.
You mixed the sampling frequency with the audible frequency.format that provides 96kHz sampling frequency and 48kHz analog sound.
You mixed the sampling frequency with the audible frequency.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_frequency