• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Which multichannel music upmixer do you like ?

Gedeon

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 30, 2018
Messages
191
Likes
195
Each brand has his own, DTS has its NEO...

I'm already have tested those but very curious about your experiences.
 

BDWoody

Chief Cat Herder
Moderator
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
7,024
Likes
23,075
Location
Mid-Atlantic, USA. (Maryland)
Each brand has his own, DTS has its NEO...

I'm already have tested those but very curious about your experiences.

I find myself on NEO more than the others...
 

Dimifoot

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
506
Likes
746
Location
Greece
Auro for me
 

Senior NEET Engineer

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 6, 2020
Messages
538
Likes
591
Location
San Diego
The only one I've tried is Dolby Surround (Atmos). It works great for TV and classical music, but adds too many sound effects to rear channels with rock music. I'm considering to try out Penteo Surround, but will probably just settle with Auro 3D for convenience.
 

Martin

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2018
Messages
1,905
Likes
5,566
Location
Cape Coral, FL
I think all upmixers sound hokey. I listen to stereo material as stereo. I do, however, like multichannel material. Alan Parsons original quad mix of DSOTM is cool. Adele Live at Royal Albert Hall and 3 Doors Down Monster Music concert recordings are both very good, too.

Martin
 

Chrispy

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
7,915
Likes
6,076
Location
PNW
Depends on the music IMO. Some works well with upmixers, some doesn't. Better to have actual multich content to start, tho. I've only got versions up to Dolby PLIIx/z and DTS Neo:X....and mostly prefer the Dolby PLIIx music mode. I hear nice things about the latest Dolby Surround but no experience....
 

pierre

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 1, 2017
Messages
963
Likes
3,052
Location
Switzerland
I use Penteo Surround a lot. It is pretty well done, you can easily customize it per type of music, it adapt to your setup ( it support all atmos, aero ... configuration). Not cheap and you also need a daw with it. Reaper+Penteo is around 400$.
I have also use Nugen's Halo upmix which is not bad but more expensive.
 

Senior NEET Engineer

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 6, 2020
Messages
538
Likes
591
Location
San Diego
I use Penteo Surround a lot. It is pretty well done, you can easily customize it per type of music, it adapt to your setup ( it support all atmos, aero ... configuration). Not cheap and you also need a daw with it. Reaper+Penteo is around 400$.
I have also use Nugen's Halo upmix which is not bad but more expensive.

Do you have to convert the files offline or does it work live?
 

StevenEleven

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
581
Likes
1,190
I have dolby digital on my Onkyo (in addition to some other stuff). Onkyo builds on the Dolby digital to add additional flavors of the Dolby Digital. I read the Onkyo documentation to get a hint of what they are doing. It seems to me that Onkyo does an awful lot right once you get through the marketing speak and get the gist of what they are doing technically. For example, the room correction software focuses primarily or only on breaking up standing waves in the bass and doesn’t seem to touch anything above 200 hz. Perfect. Right in step with Dr. Toole’s book.

Anyway, I tend to choose upmixing options, Onkyo flavors of Dolby digital, that exaggerate the least effects (like reverb or delay or whatever they are extracting out of the original recording) but still upmix the stuff around. I guess you could say I’m looking to maintain a dry, precise sound, but with the obvious immersive benefits of upmixing. The Onkyo Dolby Digital based “Unplugged” variant seems to do this well for me, for example. The upmixing options and apparently the room correction algorithms have improved with firmware upgrades, and they do seem to work in tandem, which I’m very pleased about.
 
Last edited:

Dogen

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Messages
362
Likes
615
Location
Durham, NC USA
Upmixing can sound pretty good or terrible. I’m not opposed to it on principle, and I tend to like NEO best. More subtle and AFAIK doesn’t touch the front left and right speakers. I’m very curious about Auro, though.
 

Sancus

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
2,926
Likes
7,636
Location
Canada
I also like DTS: Neo X, it seems to do a good job of keeping the primary vocals out of the surround channels. It's definitely much better than Dolby PLIIx which I've found to put too much into the surround channels at too high volumes. You just want a touch of spaciousness added there, not so loud you can easily distinguish it from the front channels.

That said I also want to hear Auro since it seems to be so well-regarded and it works with height channels in a convincing way, allegedly. Also curious about Harman's Logic 16 and the manually-tuned Penteo approach.
 

snickers

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
49
Likes
27
NEO I never liked, but Dolby PLIIx was for me far better.
But still, for music I frefered only stereo over Dolby PLIIx.

Since I have Logic7, it's just always on for every source; movie, tv or music.
 

Costas EAR

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
157
Likes
348
Location
Greece
But still, for music I frefered only stereo
What's your speaker setup?

I think that dts "neo 6 music", is a really good upmixer, i've used it for almost a year.

The latest Dolby surround is also a very good upmixer, and it maintains with great accuracy the tonality of the upmixed raw format.

Auro 3D is the most commonly used upmixer for me, as it creates the most pleasant result.

My setup is 7.4.4 and for all 11 satellites i use exactly the same speaker, and exactly the same listening distance.
 
Last edited:

snickers

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
49
Likes
27
My actual setup is a 5.0 system with 2x Klipsch RP280F, 1x RP-280C (a RP-280F modified as center) and 2x RP-150M for surround.
Receiver is a Harman AVR 760 (in USA 7550HD).

Here are my prefered upmixers:

AVR: Yamaha RX-A1050:
Movies: Dolby PLIIx
TV: Dolby PLIIx
Music: Stereo (sometimes Dolby PLIIx, depended on the source)

AVR: Harman AVR 760:
Movies: Logic7
TV: Logic7
Music: Logic7

I'm just wondering how would Auro3D or the THX upmixer from Onkyo or even the Anthemlogic from Anthem compare to Logic7.
But until now Logic7 is my prefered one.
 

Abe_W

Active Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
182
Likes
68
Location
United States
IME,
DTS NEO 6 Music with varying levels of center spread sounds the best for music to me.
Atmos with Center Spread = ON works great for some music genres of music i listen to.
Neural X works great on some genres (electronica, etc)
Auro is a mixed bag.

Many classic rock albums sound bad with upmixing (best kept in stereo). To be fair, they sound like crap in stereo as well.

I have a 5.2.2 setup and switch back and forth between 5.2 and 5.2.2. I can do it with the single click on my receiver.
 
Top Bottom