Now that we’ve sorted that one out, I have a similar birdie question that perhaps you can help with:
“Why is a duck?”
“Why is a duck?”
But none of them were chicken eggs until there was a chicken.The egg came first - by a billion years or more
Chickens for the water naturally.Now that we’ve sorted that one out, I have a similar birdie question that perhaps you can help with:
“Why is a duck?”
The answer I’ve most often heard is:Chickens for the water naturally.
But none of them were chicken eggs until there was a chicken.
Actually no it doesn't. The historical context is at least as old as Aristotle. And the implied meaning in this asks which came first chicken or chicken egg. Even that is rather metaphorical. Switching to an evolutionary viewpoint on the question provides different information and explains how chickens came to be without a first chicken created in the beginning (or a first egg). But that changes the entire nature of the question in regards to thinking about infinite regress.That wasn't the question.
It specifically states "the egg" - i.e. the archetype, with no jitter
Reading the same OP, which actually the original post doesn't have the word egg in it. I'm reading it in a wider context than you are.you must be reading a different OP
Evolution is effective but very slow. I'm afraid they would only become M2s thousands of years later.Speakers should work like evolution. You by some JBL 104 eggs. Then you feed theme with enough AC/DC and after some time they evolve to some M2's.
Speakers should work like evolution. You by some JBL 104 eggs. Then you feed theme with enough AC/DC and after some time they evolve to some M2's.