a4eaudio
Senior Member
So this is really asking for a subjective criteria to qualitatively categorize objective data.
We often speak of narrow and wide dispersion speakers. Looking at Amirm's Beamwidth graphs, what level of beamwidth or greater would you generally consider "wide" and what level of beamwidth or less would you generally consider "narrow"? [Yes, I could go through 100-200 reviews, collect the data and come up with an objective interpretation but that is way too much work
]
As examples:
GRIMM Audio LS1c had beamwidth of +/- 90 degrees and was labeled "very" wide
Revel F206 Tower +/- 65 degrees labeled "wide"
Focal Aria 906 +/- 60 degrees labeled "good"
Neumann KH150 +/- 50 degrees labeled a "bit narrow"
We often speak of narrow and wide dispersion speakers. Looking at Amirm's Beamwidth graphs, what level of beamwidth or greater would you generally consider "wide" and what level of beamwidth or less would you generally consider "narrow"? [Yes, I could go through 100-200 reviews, collect the data and come up with an objective interpretation but that is way too much work

As examples:
GRIMM Audio LS1c had beamwidth of +/- 90 degrees and was labeled "very" wide
Revel F206 Tower +/- 65 degrees labeled "wide"
Focal Aria 906 +/- 60 degrees labeled "good"
Neumann KH150 +/- 50 degrees labeled a "bit narrow"