The high end community doesn't like Bob Carver very much. They get all upset when someone shows up with an amp that costs way less than their beloved piece, performs better objectively, and sounds the same in a blind test. It started with his Phase Linear amps that had a lot of power for less money than the competition. (His original amp design was in a coffee can and caused quiet a stir at the McIntosh clinics when it put our more power than their huge amps). It continued when Bob challenged Stereophile that he could make his Carver amps sound like any amp they chose in a blind test and did so. His Carver amps were constantly labeled as poor sound quality and not having the power, many claiming they had inadequate power supplies since they were light (they used a switching power supply and multiple voltage rails). The high end community also didn't like his use of op amps.
It is no different than Class D amps are now. They measure well, perform well, but constantly are derided by the high end community as sounding poor and not having this or that. It is what happens when your personal value becomes tied to your audio equipment and you spent a lot of money. Now all of sudden some guy shows up at your elite $10,000 amp club with a $1,000 amp that is every bit as good subjectively, and wipes the floor objectively. Look no further than something like the Parsound JC1+ amps at $17,000. They put out less power with higher distortion than a pair of NC1200 based amps which are $2,500.
I am sure a lot of high end companies are not happy with Carver's tube amps. His cheap amp puts out more clean power than their big amps, is designed so the tubes last a lifetime, and has a lifetime warranty. His middle amp is 350 watts a channel. His insane no holes barred amp is $32,000, real high end money, but puts out 900 watts and will drive a one ohm load.