wadude
Active Member
I regret not stock piling 7199s and EL34s back in 1978. Beautiful Mullard rectifiers, Phillips 6CA7s. They were like dirt, for your money’s wort’.
I mean... tubes and vinyls do go together.Like vinyl...![]()
I bought lots of Ruby Tubes. Mostly EL34s…a few 12AX7s and 12AU7s. But it was interesting settling for the decline in overall quality and rising prices over the years. Not saying there aren’t still good options. As a Dynaco kind of guy, it was the steady erosion of available 7199s that signaled the end of easy for me.Tube prices aren't too crazy... Some power tubes (like beam pentodes) are kind of pricey I guess.
![]()
Preamp Tubes
Ruby tubes have been carefully matched and tested. Our preamp tubes are designed to deliver superior sound quality and are compatible with a wide range of amplifiers and audio systemsrubytubes.com
But he also points out that class D is catching on with guitar/bass amplification, which is far more important. Anyone who lugs around a guitar amp (I do, I play with others who do) knows what a pain the sheer weight of these "portable" amps can be, and that anything to make them lighter would be welcome. And class D instrument amplification would greatly reduce demand for "valves", as guitar/bass amps have a larger consumer base for tubes than the "audiophile" market. And he also points out how sources for tubes are either drying up or getting harder to access.Yes, I’ve seen Ralph’s opinion on this and I think it’s nonsense.
If the tube market tanks at some point, it certainly is not going to be due to “class D amps.”
The whole point of tube gear for many audiophiles is that - ostensibly at least - it sounds different from neutral solid state gear.
That’s the whole fun of it.
Class D is just another neutral, solid state amplifier technology. We’ve had sonic transparency neutrality available from consumer solid state amps since… what?… the late 60s? The tube market never went away fully.
The only reason somebody like Ralph thinks class D would undermine the tube market is that he’s got a subjective opinion “ finally class D sounds as ‘natural’ as tubes! In fact better!”
So all he’s really going on is his own subjective opinion and current preference, which all sorts of audiophiles are simply not going to share.
And that goes for whether the audiophile impressions of tube amps sounding different or legitimate in some cases or not in others, but due to bias effects. Because even then it’s not like bias effects are going to suddenly go away along with all the characteristics, people attribute to tube amplifiers.
The power tubes I *did* stock up on are excellent but don't have a lot of resale value. So those will stay here and go into projects. But all the onesy-twosy Mullards, Siemens, Brimars, and the like... all going on the block.Now thats something I absolutely regret not stocking up on when they were readily available.
I reckon that there are two markets. Guitar amps and domestic home amps.
Are people with guitar amps interested in vintage NOS 6SN7 tubes? Maybe vintage rectifiers like original Mullards, yeah, but what else?
I too have a bunch of boxes of "premium" pairs of 6SN7 tubes, like "real" Bad Boys (first 6 months of 1952, three holes) grey RCA 6SN7, metal based Syls, Tung Sol round plates (they are OK) etc etc that I'd like to liquidate but being in Australia it is difficult to access an international audience, plus I don't have easy access to a tube tester. Sigh.
All NOS.
Thinking that I ought to plonk a note on them to gift them to the bloke who hand-built my tube (we call them valves) amp (including winding the transformers), just in case I get bitten by a wild kangaroo. Or they will just be thrown out.
I reckon that there are two markets. Guitar amps and domestic home amps.
Are people with guitar amps interested in vintage NOS 6SN7 tubes? Maybe vintage rectifiers like original Mullards, yeah, but what else?
I too have a bunch of boxes of "premium" pairs of 6SN7 tubes, like "real" Bad Boys (first 6 months of 1952, three holes) grey RCA 6SN7, metal based Syls, Tung Sol round plates (they are OK) etc etc that I'd like to liquidate but being in Australia it is difficult to access an international audience, plus I don't have easy access to a tube tester. Sigh.
All NOS.
Thinking that I ought to plonk a note on them to gift them to the bloke who hand-built my tube (we call them valves) amp (including winding the transformers), just in case I get bitten by a wild kangaroo. Or they will just be thrown out.
I think the market for tube amplifiers and tubes has been consistently stable for years.The generation who grew up with the tubes will pass and then it will become super niche. I don't think tubes will come back like vinyl.
My father's tubes were mostly of the color television kind (he was a TV repairman for most of my formative years, although a broadcast engineer before that)... but I do have his Sams.I ended up giving away my father's tube collection, hundreds of Sam's photofact schematics and a couple of old tube testers. I had to give them away, there was no way I would have had the time to cull the valuable stuff from thousands of tubes.
Untested and with no reputation definitely makes it harder to get top dollar. I think eBay would probably have the broadest reach. You could build some feedback after the first couple transactions.A side question, what is the best way to sell them? Especially if you don't have a tester? I'd assume to get good money they would need to be sold with test results. And even then just jumping into it with no reputation seems like it could be hard to get top dollar.
Me personally, I would pray that I could find the email receipt of when I purchased them and use that info if it's there. Might be wishful thinking.A side question, what is the best way to sell them? Especially if you don't have a tester? I'd assume to get good money they would need to be sold with test results. And even then just jumping into it with no reputation seems like it could be hard to get top dollar.