• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

When 12 Gauge Wire is Not 12 Gauge

jhaider

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
2,822
Likes
4,514
I know it's an 'it depends' answer, but we'll just assume it's with an amp with relatively low output impedance (say, Class D-ish) and the speakers are 6-8 ohm with no exotic dips.

In our living room, the in-wall speaker wires are 14AWG. I think the installer used the brand called Structured Cable Products. They run up a side wall, under the crown molding at the wall-ceiling joint, and back down the side wall to terminals near the intended speaker locations. The front right run is probably around 20', and the front left run is roughly double. Wall terminals are Neutrik Speakon, with each 14AWG core going to a separate terminal to allow active biamping. The cables outside the wall are also 14AWG.

Long story short, I've used AVRs or pre-pros with Anthem ARC, Audyssey XT32, YPAO 3D, and Dirac Live. None of them have reported a difference in level between left and right front speakers. Nor have I ever subjectively noticed an image shift.

The reason I ask: my new house is pre-wired with speaker jacks all over the place, but the previous owner used skinny lamp cord type stuff. I might want to upgrade the wiring (it runs in the crawl space).

I would replace it with 14/4 cable, or 12/4 cable if runs are really long. The reason for 4-core is that will allow you to use a rack mounted DSP and amps for biamped speakers. If you think you might go really complicated, there is 8-core speaker wire from Mogami and others as well. Markertek is my usual source for speaker cable. They sell most of the their cables by the foot, so you don't have to buy a spool. Prices range from $1.50-$2.00 per foot for 14/4 or 12/4 from most brands. Mogami is a little more expensive. If you have 4S11 it is a good choice, unless you want the wire to be a little stiff to hold its shape over a longer straight run.
 

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,408
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Archimago has an amusing article on rolling his own speaker cables from Canare 4S11:

http://archimago.blogspot.com/2014/10/diy-musings-bi-wired-canare-4s11-and.html

Some interesting quotes:

"The 4S11 cable consists of 4 conductors ("quad") under the sheath. Each multi-stranded conductor is 14AWG and a pair would be equivalent to 11AWG"

I'm not sure if he means a bi-wire pair or a standard pair.
 

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,408
Location
Seattle Area, USA
This is an amazingly handy chart:

image
 

DonH56

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 15, 2016
Messages
7,834
Likes
16,496
Location
Monument, CO
Archimago has an amusing article on rolling his own speaker cables from Canare 4S11:

http://archimago.blogspot.com/2014/10/diy-musings-bi-wired-canare-4s11-and.html

Some interesting quotes:

"The 4S11 cable consists of 4 conductors ("quad") under the sheath. Each multi-stranded conductor is 14AWG and a pair would be equivalent to 11AWG"

I'm not sure if he means a bi-wire pair or a standard pair.

Two 14 AWG conductors in parallel provide roughly the same cross-sectional area as a single 11 AWG wire. Use the four wires as a single pair by putting two wires in parallel for the positive and negative connections.
 

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,408
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Two 14 AWG conductors in parallel provide roughly the same cross-sectional area as a single 11 AWG wire. Use the four wires as a single pair by putting two wires in parallel for the positive and negative connections.

That's what I do now.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,368
Likes
234,381
Location
Seattle Area
I heard back from the shop and we use the Canare as far as 150 feet if feeding one speaker. If feeding two, we stop at 100 feet or so.

BTW, the Canare is not UL certified for in-wall use! We have gotten a case by case certification but Canare itself has not applied for certification.
 

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,408
Location
Seattle Area, USA
I heard back from the shop and we use the Canare as far as 150 feet if feeding one speaker. If feeding two, we stop at 100 feet or so.

BTW, the Canare is not UL certified for in-wall use! We have gotten a case by case certification but Canare itself has not applied for certification.

giphy.gif
 

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,068
Likes
16,598
Location
Central Fl
Last edited:

maxxevv

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 12, 2018
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,964
Interesting tests.

Other than resistive/ impedance effects, noted that you have included capacitance ?

Was getting a little lost on reading about how capacitance can affect the sound in earphones and headphones and how some cable makers actually "tune" their characteristics of their cables.
I know it sounds like snake oil, I have my big question mark moment there too!

Have you considered a test in that regard to how the frequency response of speakers/headphones/earphones can/not be affected by capacitance?

It would be great to put the myth(s) to rest though.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,368
Likes
234,381
Location
Seattle Area
This test was conducted in the context of speaker wires. I did measure the capacitance and from that, we could compute the impedance. We would then need to compare that to the impedance of headphones. So I don't have anything definitive to share in that context. I will put it on my todo list to evaluate. :)
 

rebbiputzmaker

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
1,099
Likes
462
Interesting tests.

Other than resistive/ impedance effects, noted that you have included capacitance ?

Was getting a little lost on reading about how capacitance can affect the sound in earphones and headphones and how some cable makers actually "tune" their characteristics of their cables.
I know it sounds like snake oil, I have my big question mark moment there too!

Have you considered a test in that regard to how the frequency response of speakers/headphones/earphones can/not be affected by capacitance?

It would be great to put the myth(s) to rest though.
Bad wire can act like filters IMO, but that is really an extreme and not going to make a big difference for most people. Headphone cables maybe even less because you are dealing with such short distances. A very high C 50ft speaker will be different from a 3ft headphone cable. YMMV
 

maxxevv

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 12, 2018
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,964
I have my skepticism too. As I have swapped out my stock earphone cables for so called 'upgrade' cables purely on the basis of better comfort and eliminating microphonics and I really can't hear a difference in sound signature between them and stock. Or at the very least, it wasn't significant enough for my ears to pick up.

There, out in the market are 3-digit and even 4-digit priced earphone ( yes, NOT headphone, NOT speaker either) cables where people claim that they can discern a different sound signature / render with these cables connected. I have not had the chance to try them to discern a difference of course.

On a separate but related note, there are recommendations for use of teflon coated cables over PP / PE / rubber coated insulation materials in speaker interconnect cables to maximise 'transparency'. It turns out that capacitance in cables is also correlated to the dielectric coefficient of the insulating material. Teflon or PTFE being possibly the lowest in the dielectric coefficient of the commonly used materials. So there was some scientific basis for it ( , or so it seems). Besides how the wires are weaved / braided, length, distance between opposing strands and all that "up in the air " stuff.

Hence, that's how things got me curious.
 

Wombat

Master Contributor
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
6,722
Likes
6,459
Location
Australia
I have my skepticism too. As I have swapped out my stock earphone cables for so called 'upgrade' cables purely on the basis of better comfort and eliminating microphonics and I really can't hear a difference in sound signature between them and stock. Or at the very least, it wasn't significant enough for my ears to pick up.

There, out in the market are 3-digit and even 4-digit priced earphone ( yes, NOT headphone, NOT speaker either) cables where people claim that they can discern a different sound signature / render with these cables connected. I have not had the chance to try them to discern a difference of course.

On a separate but related note, there are recommendations for use of teflon coated cables over PP / PE / rubber coated insulation materials in speaker interconnect cables to maximise 'transparency'. It turns out that capacitance in cables is also correlated to the dielectric coefficient of the insulating material. Teflon or PTFE being possibly the lowest in the dielectric coefficient of the commonly used materials. So there was some scientific basis for it ( , or so it seems). Besides how the wires are weaved / braided, length, distance between opposing strands and all that "up in the air " stuff.

Hence, that's how things got me curious.


I would have more faith in long established reputations of headphone mfrs than upstart add-on sellers re cable choice - unless factually proven otherwise.
 

maxxevv

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 12, 2018
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,964
Its mostly about the curiosity regarding what's really the truth out there. As mentioned, I couldn't discern a distinct enough difference with a new cable for my earphones.
But when I delve deeper there is some plausible basis as to why Teflon coated cables are preferred for speaker cables, related to its dielectric coefficient.

But as always, subjective hearing is never reliable and that's why I wondered if this whole "cable causing colouring of sound" myth can be de-mystified.
 

Wombat

Master Contributor
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
6,722
Likes
6,459
Location
Australia
Its mostly about the curiosity regarding what's really the truth out there. As mentioned, I couldn't discern a distinct enough difference with a new cable for my earphones.
But when I delve deeper there is some plausible basis as to why Teflon coated cables are preferred for speaker cables, related to its dielectric coefficient.

But as always, subjective hearing is never reliable and that's why I wondered if this whole "cable causing colouring of sound" myth can be de-mystified.


Forget about the material and construction details. It comes down to R,L and C of the conductor at audio transmission voltages and frequencies, and interface impedance characteristics. Don't overthink it. :rolleyes:
 

Palladium

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 4, 2017
Messages
630
Likes
769
Its mostly about the curiosity regarding what's really the truth out there. As mentioned, I couldn't discern a distinct enough difference with a new cable for my earphones.
But when I delve deeper there is some plausible basis as to why Teflon coated cables are preferred for speaker cables, related to its dielectric coefficient.

But as always, subjective hearing is never reliable and that's why I wondered if this whole "cable causing colouring of sound" myth can be de-mystified.

So, do you also believe in teapots in space?
 
Top Bottom