I'd encourage you to spend some time reading through the Korf blog. They've done a lot of measurements of head shells, tonearms and bearings.
Example: https://korfaudio.com/blog49
Read with healthy skepticism.
I'd encourage you to spend some time reading through the Korf blog. They've done a lot of measurements of head shells, tonearms and bearings.
Example: https://korfaudio.com/blog49
Got to add that these days, vinyl systems are anything BUT sensible
Can I just have your SL95B to add to my Garrard collection please?
I love lossless streaming of ripped CDs. Used CDs are often very cheap indeed. I recently bought a bundle of 9 CDs for £8 + postage. Even new CDs are usually cheaper than downloads, which makes no sense to me at all!There is a lot of music that didn't make it onto CD, let alone streaming.
The mastering for digital simply isn't the same.
Used vinyl can be very cheap if you know where to look.
I love lossless streaming on Apple Music, etc., but vinyl still has its place in my world.
Maybe best for a PM, but I've typed chapter and verse, along with BBen on VE, on how to check and smooth the mechs on these.If you can figure out how to get it to run at the correct speed, I guess I would have to give it to you
It runs fast at ~33.9 with a retreaded idler and slow at ~32.9 with one of those new "aviation quality" aluminun + thin band of rubber idlers. Interestingly, my restored SL72B loves the Canadian idler and runs nicely at ~ 33.46. And in general the SL72B is much less of a PITA. I put it down to having that lighter, one piece platter. In contrast, the 95B has what I call a "grandpa platter" since its humungous two-piece monstrosity is so cranky with every idler. The 72's tonearm action during the auto cycle is also much smoother, which I again put down to its having the lighter platter so it doesn't have to herky jerk so much like the 95B. BUT THE SL95B STILL WINS BECAUSE IT LOOKS S0 BEAUTIFUL.
Sorry for my running up against the limits of off-topicness. I must've gotten lost on my way to AK.
It certainly seems that way, but, even in 2024 that doesn't need to be the case.Got to add that these days, vinyl systems are anything BUT sensible
And I want Shannon Parks to keep developing and enhancing the Waxwing... so need a lot more people with @mhardy6647's attitudeIt certainly seems that way, but, even in 2024 that doesn't need to be the case.
Most my used CDs run between $2-$3/ea and the vinyl runs between $5-$15/ea, usually titles that are hard to find
Vinyl records, new, are now as expensive as they've ever been.
CDs, second-hand, are now as cheap as they've ever been.
Since they're so cheap, I bought a few more
View attachment 408897
Vinyl records, new, are now as expensive as they've ever been.
CDs, second-hand, are now as cheap as they've ever been.
Since they're so cheap, I bought a few more
View attachment 408897
New CDs are usually half the cost of the record. Better quality for a lower price sounds like a win to me.
Lossless streaming is almost free and even better than Red Book quality with all the hi-rez options. I love Apple Music Classical!
I also buy a lot of $1-2 records with music that never made it to CD, let alone streaming, so the highest available quality for that stuff is in fact vinyl.
CDs seem like the worst of both worlds in 2024, but I'm glad people are enjoying them.
(Whittaker–)Nyquist–Shannon theorem?
CD quality lossless is great. The "Hi-Res" stuff is all snake oil BS as far as playback goes.
Unless:
You listen to "music" with a dynamic range from a pin drop to a jackhammer, 24 bit is a waste.
Your DAC is defective and doesn't filter out the useless noise frequencies above 22khz. Anything above CD quality 44.1khz is filtered out before it goes to your amp.
That's a weird position to take in a measurement-oriented forum.
If you think Red Book is the be-all and end-all for your uses, that's wonderful. But the difference with hi-rez formats easily measured and therefore not snake oil.