solderdude
Grand Contributor
It has been mentioned what matters.
1: Frequency response (at 44.1kHz)
2: noise level
3: added distortion (various types and reasons)
Add to that there can be different actual performance when using other gear/circumstances than Amirs test gear.
So they all really matter, most likely in the order above.
SINAD only covers 2 and 3 (partly under specific conditions)
It may not be wise to pick a DAC on 'the most important' spec only. When one insists SINAD is not the worst parameter to base it on.
No guarantees though. One should always look at the whole picture when using a selection process based on measured/verified technical performance only.
I would assume that those doing that also knows what functionality, looks, price, connectivity and supported formats it has.
Those that don't understand or don't care should either take some advice or look elsewhere for subjective impressions.
1: Frequency response (at 44.1kHz)
2: noise level
3: added distortion (various types and reasons)
Add to that there can be different actual performance when using other gear/circumstances than Amirs test gear.
So they all really matter, most likely in the order above.
SINAD only covers 2 and 3 (partly under specific conditions)
It may not be wise to pick a DAC on 'the most important' spec only. When one insists SINAD is not the worst parameter to base it on.
No guarantees though. One should always look at the whole picture when using a selection process based on measured/verified technical performance only.
I would assume that those doing that also knows what functionality, looks, price, connectivity and supported formats it has.
Those that don't understand or don't care should either take some advice or look elsewhere for subjective impressions.
Last edited: