• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). Come here to have fun, be ready to be teased and not take online life too seriously. We now measure and review equipment for free! Click here for details.

What makes someone believe or reject information?

RayDunzl

Major Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
5,270
Likes
1,277
Location
Riverview, Fl
#1
https://phys.org/news/2018-04-what-makes-someone-believe-or.html

"The study used experiments where people viewed video clips of scientists speaking at conferences. One group of participants heard the recordings in clear high-quality audio, while the other group heard the same recordings with poor-quality audio.

Participants were then asked to evaluate the researchers and their work. Those who listened to the poorer quality audio consistently evaluated the scientists as less intelligent and their research as less important."
 

Soniclife

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
552
Likes
155
Location
UK
#2
Interesting, probably holds for video quality would be an assumption. How about physical attractiveness of the speaker?

There is also this.
 

RayDunzl

Major Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
5,270
Likes
1,277
Location
Riverview, Fl
#3
I believe it.

Both the audio and video quality were good.
 

Cosmik

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
2,103
Likes
840
Location
UK
#4
There is also this.
It's a fact that a diesel car produces less CO2 per mile than a petrol car.
To some people it's a fact that CO2 adversely affects the climate, and c.1997 this view became mainstream.
The European Union used these facts to justify promoting diesel over petrol, with price incentives for drivers to change to diesel.
It's a fact that diesel cars in the UK rocketed in popularity.
However, it's a fact that diesel cars produce poisonous compounds and particulates. This fact was known at the time, but nice people ignored it, and only nasty people (probably fascists) mentioned it.
It's a fact that diesel fumes are now linked to many early deaths and respiratory diseases in the cities of Britain.
It's a fact that the UK's Chief Scientist now claims he made a mistake and that he was told untrue facts by the evil corporations.
https://www.theguardian.com/environ...-cars-was-wrong-says-ex-chief-science-adviser

In other words, only very naive people believe that 'facts' are the answer to anything at all. Facts are merely tiny selective slivers out of the 'information space' and can be used to say anything anyone likes. People who are sceptical of 'facts' may be a lot more sophisticated than the open minded, nice, non-tribal (yeah, as if) people who think that 'facts' can settle any argument.
 

stalepie

Active Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Messages
142
Likes
21
#5
Yes, how someone presents themselves, how well dressed they are, and how good of a speaker these are -- these are like sound quality and visual quality, too in making a better impression.
 

svart-hvitt

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Messages
1,315
Likes
467
#6
It's a fact that a diesel car produces less CO2 per mile than a petrol car.
To some people it's a fact that CO2 adversely affects the climate, and c.1997 this view became mainstream.
The European Union used these facts to justify promoting diesel over petrol, with price incentives for drivers to change to diesel.
It's a fact that diesel cars in the UK rocketed in popularity.
However, it's a fact that diesel cars produce poisonous compounds and particulates. This fact was known at the time, but nice people ignored it, and only nasty people (probably fascists) mentioned it.
It's a fact that diesel fumes are now linked to many early deaths and respiratory diseases in the cities of Britain.
It's a fact that the UK's Chief Scientist now claims he made a mistake and that he was told untrue facts by the evil corporations.
https://www.theguardian.com/environ...-cars-was-wrong-says-ex-chief-science-adviser

In other words, only very naive people believe that 'facts' are the answer to anything at all. Facts are merely tiny selective slivers out of the 'information space' and can be used to say anything anyone likes. People who are sceptical of 'facts' may be a lot more sophisticated than the open minded, nice, non-tribal (yeah, as if) people who think that 'facts' can settle any argument.
Yes, in complex matters we need subjective evaluation of facts at hand.
 

cjfrbw

Active Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Messages
118
Likes
53
#7
Good sound means that the scientists and their work boogies. Bad sound means that it doesn't.
 

Wombat

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
2,272
Likes
789
Location
Australia
#8
Knowledge and understanding vs ignorance and indoctrination.

Lurking is hard to do!

o_O
 

Brad

Active Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2016
Messages
112
Likes
29
#10
Government should also take advice from independent government labs. But politicians tend not to believe government scientists, as their advice is not consistent with their policy.
Bureaucrats then hire consultants to tell them what they want to hear
 

Similar threads

Top Bottom