Yes that's it.
But the wallyskater contains a mathematical flaw not mentioned in the manual (or that the scale is adapted to that).
Because the wallyskater is basically a balance, and the movement of the arm from left to right is not a strickt line but an arch, the scale should be somewhat progressive. The more the arm moves, the more the arm raises with the same sideways movement (requiering more force).
So with that stiction problem I mentioned, a cool experiment would be (with a wallyskater) to mount a tiny vibrating motor from a mobile phone or something, but maybe with less vibration/a lighter excenter weigth) on the top of the wallyskater.
Those vibrations might put the armbearings in a state of motion, reducing stiction. I would be very interested to see if those vibrations result in the arm moving more to the side, proving that stiction is a factor.
Do you get the same measurement value with your wallyskater as you do with your vtf scale? (the values from moving from left to right can't be copied from the original wallyskater manual as your wallyskater is a lot taller, so it has to be re-calculated)
What I find strange, is that there aren't any knockoffs available from China on aliexpress.
I mean, you could build it for like €5, there's no patent (not that that matters in China), and the wallyskater costs €250 or so (a ridiculous amount, but that's hifi....). There are even sites that show how to build your own wallyskater.